Haven't followed the story, and googling didn't turn up much. What are the inconsistencies?
According to the commentators, she says the phone sex call which is the basis of her claim wasn't consensual.
He says it was.
His Phone records show it went on for about an hour.
Again according to the commentators, the coach and the woman had some type
of "relationship".
When it ended, she filed her complaint.
One thing that is certain is that MSU would owe the coach a lot of money, unless they can prove they fired him "with cause".
None of what you just said is anything other than hearsay and gossip speculation coming from a talk radio show that's designed to influence one way or the other. The evidence is pretty damning, and MSU's own investigation has concluded such.
https://defector.com/michigan-state-has-begun-the-process... "During the period where you both discussed further [Set the Expectation] presentations, and while married, you admitted to the following behaviors:
-Commenting to the Vendor about her looks, body, and body parts, specifically her “a**”
-Making flirtatious comments to the Vendor in conversations that you stated “happened often”
-Masturbating and making sexually explicit comments about yourself and the Vendor while on the phone with the Vendor, which you describe as “phone sex” and “a late-night intimate conversation”
While The Formal Grievance process proceeds, the above-described undisputed facts provide multiple grounds for termination under the Agreements Early Termination Provision. Your admitted behavior (1) constitutes a material breach of your duties under the Agreement, (2) demonstrates "conduct which constitutes moral turpitude," and (3) has brought "public disrespect, contempt, or ridicule upon the S077 University." (Section IILB.1 (a) and (c).) Each of these grounds provide an independent basis under which the University may terminate the Agreement, which the University elects to now terminate."
Undisputed facts is the key term here.
Last Edited: 9/19/2023 3:24:22 PM by GoCats105