Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Peach Bowl
Page: 1 of 1
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 12/31/2014 6:08 PM
Read this at the end of a Peach Bowl article today. Any thoughts on why/what this means?

Attendance was 65,706, ending the Peach Bowl's streak of 17 consecutive sellouts.

The bowl is sponsored by Chick-fil-A.
Pete Chouteau
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: You Can't See Me
Post Count: 1,696
mail
Pete Chouteau
mail
Posted: 12/31/2014 6:23 PM
The game has always been ACC-SEC, and TCU did not bring half a stadium of people.
Recovering Journalist
General User
RJ
Member Since: 8/17/2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Post Count: 1,864
person
mail
Recovering Journalist
mail
Posted: 12/31/2014 6:26 PM
A fading SEC team with less history than the elites in its league against a jilted P5 team that every thinks it should be playing tomorrow.

That, along with the usual reasons not to attend a bowl game (cost, travel planning, better to watch on TV, etc.).
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,559
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 12/31/2014 6:52 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
Read this at the end of a Peach Bowl article today. Any thoughts on why/what this means?

Attendance was 65,706, ending the Peach Bowl's streak of 17 consecutive sellouts.

The bowl is sponsored by Chick-fil-A.
It seems pretty self explanatory
ts1227
General User
T1227
Member Since: 2/28/2006
Location: Tallmadge, OH
Post Count: 880
person
mail
ts1227
mail
Posted: 12/31/2014 8:03 PM
Due to the Playoff and their structuring of the "New Year's Six", the time of the game was moved from its typical prime time spot (it has been at 7 or 8 PM on NYE lately, and when not on NYE it was always at night at least) to 12:30 PM, which is a terrible time for a game.

Usually lunch time bowls are the crap ones, not the Peach Bowl (which has generally been considered a higher tier bowl, hence its inclusion in the New Year's Six) There's no way that helped anything.
Last Edited: 12/31/2014 8:04:50 PM by ts1227
ts1227
General User
T1227
Member Since: 2/28/2006
Location: Tallmadge, OH
Post Count: 880
person
mail
ts1227
mail
Posted: 12/31/2014 8:13 PM
To follow up on my own post, maybe I'm wrong, as there is NO ONE in Miami right now for the Orange Bowl.
MedinaCat
General User
MC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Lakewood, OH
Post Count: 750
person
mail
MedinaCat
mail
Posted: 12/31/2014 9:01 PM
I noticed the same thing when I flipped the channel. The upper decks in end zones are empty and a lot of orange seats everywhere. My wife noticed it immediately.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,697
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 12/31/2014 9:14 PM
ts1227 wrote:expand_more
To follow up on my own post, maybe I'm wrong, as there is NO ONE in Miami right now for the Orange Bowl.
Hmm . . . people must be boycotting the sponsor -- an evil credit card company from Virginia, the heart of the old Confederacy! ;-)
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 12/31/2014 10:21 PM
The powers that be fought the playoff for a long time out of fear that the non-playoff bowls would then become irrelevant (as if they were actually relevant). Perhaps it will be time to go to a full-fledged playoff, and make all the bowls relevant.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 12/31/2014 10:33 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
The powers that be fought the playoff for a long time out of fear that the non-playoff bowls would then become irrelevant (as if they were actually relevant). Perhaps it will be time to go to a full-fledged playoff, and make all the bowls relevant.
This makes perfect sense - kind of like the basketball tournaments other than the NCAA.
72 Bobcat
General User
72B
Member Since: 2/28/2007
Location: Harleysville, PA
Post Count: 46
person
mail
72 Bobcat
mail
Posted: 1/1/2015 9:14 AM
Pete,
TCU may not have brought have the stadium but they sure "brought the Wood shed"!
Pete Chouteau
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: You Can't See Me
Post Count: 1,696
mail
Pete Chouteau
mail
Posted: 1/1/2015 9:37 AM
If emoticons were enabled, I would remark that fan support means little to the players and coaches on the field.

But there are no emoticons, and the inability of the general populace to detect sarcasm makes me reticent to put such thoughts in writing.

Instead, I think people aren't coming to the games because they won't throw the ball to the tight end.
davepi2
General User
D2
Member Since: 7/9/2010
Location: columbus, OH
Post Count: 583
person
mail
davepi2
mail
Posted: 1/1/2015 9:53 AM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
Read this at the end of a Peach Bowl article today. Any thoughts on why/what this means?

Attendance was 65,706, ending the Peach Bowl's streak of 17 consecutive sellouts.

The bowl is sponsored by Chick-fil-A.
Could this be the real reason A&M is playing today instead of TCU? No matter what the bull about the best teams they still have tv and the local hosts to please.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 1/1/2015 10:50 AM
Pete Chouteau wrote:expand_more
If emoticons were enabled, I would remark that fan support means little to the players and coaches on the field.

But there are no emoticons, and the inability of the general populace to detect sarcasm makes me reticent to put such thoughts in writing.

Instead, I think people aren't coming to the games because they won't throw the ball to the tight end.

You can always use the old fashioned emoticons.
;)
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 1/1/2015 11:16 AM
Maybe some of you missed the article about playing the games with no fans present. It seems to be all about the ratings that are going very well for the lesser bowls at least. 24/7 TV sports may be impacting fan attendance more than we think.
Regarding the Bahamas bowl, why would anyone expect more than a few thousands attending such a game? It's all for TV.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 1/1/2015 1:26 PM
Pete Chouteau wrote:expand_more
If emoticons were enabled, I would remark that fan support means little to the players and coaches on the field.

But there are no emoticons, and the inability of the general populace to detect sarcasm makes me reticent to put such thoughts in writing.

Instead, I think people aren't coming to the games because they won't throw the ball to the tight end.


This is what happens when your program is mired in mediocrity and most of the fanbase (what fanbase?--37 regulars on this board?) is fine with it.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 1/1/2015 6:26 PM
Bowl games are scheduled now to please ESPN, which airs all but two, I think; CBS still has the Sun Bowl and I think Fox still has one. Until sometime in the '80s or '90s NBC had the Rose and Orange Bowls, CBS had the Cotton and ABC had the Sugar and (I think) the Gator, which all ran NYE or NYD. Cotton and Gator would run NYD afternoon, Rose would start at 4:45 and Orange would go around 8:30. Sometimes Sugar would go New Year's night, but most times it would be NYE night. Then bowls like Outback, Fiesta and some others wanted to be on NYD, so there were as many as seven or eight on NYD. Although the games got good overall ratings. the ratings for each game airing opposite another game suffered. Someone at ESPN has determined that it's better not to counter-program against itself so much and has spread out the games. That's why Peach and some others that used to have prime time slots are now starting at noon on 12/30 or 31. It's not to boost their ratings so much as it is to not harm the ratings of the "more important" bowls.
Last Edited: 1/1/2015 6:27:45 PM by Pataskala
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,801
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 1/2/2015 12:05 PM
davepi2 wrote:expand_more
Read this at the end of a Peach Bowl article today. Any thoughts on why/what this means?

Attendance was 65,706, ending the Peach Bowl's streak of 17 consecutive sellouts.

The bowl is sponsored by Chick-fil-A.
Could this be the real reason A&M is playing today instead of TCU? No matter what the bull about the best teams they still have tv and the local hosts to please.
OSU showed why they are playing last night.

I'd listen to the Baylor argument, but TCU lost to Baylor, marking them irrevelant in that conversation.
ou79
General User
O79
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 671
person
mail
ou79
mail
Posted: 1/2/2015 12:20 PM
And OSU lost to VaTech, who lost to Pitt, who lost to Akron, who lost to OUr beloved institution. So why are we not in the discussion?😳
Showing Messages: 1 - 19 of 19
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)