Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Your Prediction on the "National Champtionship" Game (NT)
Page: 1 of 2
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,697
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 1/11/2015 6:09 PM
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 1/11/2015 7:36 PM
I predict that few on this board care and even fewer will watch.
LuckySparrow
General User
Member Since: 10/16/2012
Location: IL
Post Count: 1,814
mail
LuckySparrow
mail
Posted: 1/11/2015 9:13 PM
I'll be watching and I care (BOO O$U!!!! Go Ducks!) because I love CFB.

I have an awful feeling about the game. I think O$U rolls them by 20. Maybe I'm just trying to set myself up for a very pleasant surprise if the Ducks can pull it out.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 1/11/2015 11:13 PM
LuckySparrow wrote:expand_more
I'll be watching and I care (BOO O$U!!!! Go Ducks!) because I love CFB.

I have an awful feeling about the game. I think O$U rolls them by 20. Maybe I'm just trying to set myself up for a very pleasant surprise if the Ducks can pull it out.

I expect Oregon to represent well. There will be more surprises from Oregon.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,697
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 1/11/2015 11:17 PM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
. . . I expect Oregon to represent well. There will be more surprises from Oregon.
I've heard an unsubstantiated rumor that they have a fairly decent QB. ;-)
Bobcatbob
General User
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Coolville, OH
Post Count: 1,351
mail
Bobcatbob
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 9:02 AM
You aren't a fan of college football if this game doesn't interest you. I would watch if Houston was playing Hawai'i. Having a team that I have some passing familiarity with in it is just icing on the cake. The good news is that the absence of any rooting interest makes it pure enjoyment.

Two things I think I think.

1. Cardale Jones playing his 3rd game and having had success is likely to try "to do too much" as the saying goes. Whether it's committing turnovers or plays breaking down too soon, look for some disarray from the Buckeyes, which could be fatal.

2. And, if OSU doesn't turn over Oregon, I think the Ducks' offense is more than the A&M defense can handle.

If OSU plays under control and wins the turnover battle, I think they win impressively.
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 9:49 AM
LuckySparrow wrote:expand_more
I'll be watching and I care (BOO O$U!!!! Go Ducks!) because I love CFB.

I have an awful feeling about the game. I think O$U rolls them by 20. Maybe I'm just trying to set myself up for a very pleasant surprise if the Ducks can pull it out.
This is where I'm at too-I love football and there's only 4 football games left in this season so I'm watching every game that I can.

I always believed that the winner of the OSU-Alabama would win the national championship and I still thin k that's the case.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 10:27 AM
Bobcatbob wrote:expand_more
You aren't a fan of college football if this game doesn't interest you.
I'm a fan of college football. But ESPN has taken all the interest out of it for me. Tired of Herbie, Reese, Lou, Mark and the rest of ESPN's brood analyzing this thing to death. Even during college basketball broadcasts. And especially tired of the Columbus media giving 15 minutes of every half-hour newscast to it (although Cabot Rae had an interesting, albeit too short, piece on the museum that once was the Texas School Book Depository). Couldn't turn around this morning without hearing the O$U band on the radio today. All they need is a Super Bowl-type ungodly long halftime show to really kill any interest (not sure if they do). I've been hyped to death. I'll pass on this one.
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,559
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 11:21 AM
I just don't think there is anything "college" about all this. These players and schools are so far removed from the real world it's not even funny. It's Phil Knight versus Les Wexner. It's money versus money, ESPN versus ESPN2. hype versus hype-ier. the more I hear, the less of a shit I give. I'll be rooting for Oregon, but I think osu wins handily... but my prediction is I won't know the result until I wake up Tuesday.
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 11:41 AM
Oregon has been beaten 3 times in the last 2 years (Stanford, Arizona, and Arizona). In all three losses, they were outgained on the ground by a significant margin. In two of the losses, they were at least -2 in turnovers. None of the losses were in particularly close games (I watched the Stanford game. Even though the final was 26-20, that was only due to a couple late Oregon scores. Stanford dominated.).

So, my prediction is that it will come down (as it does so often) to Oregon's ability (or lack thereof) to stop osu's running attack, as well as turnovers. If Oregon can turn osu over early, get up, and force osu to throw the ball, I think Oregon wins by about a touchdown. If osu is able to run the ball and doesn't turn it over, I think osu wins by 14+.

Final prediction: osu 44, Oregon 30.
OUPride
General User
OUP
Member Since: 9/21/2010
Post Count: 578
person
mail
OUPride
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 12:28 PM
Deciduous Forest Cat wrote:expand_more
I just don't think there is anything "college" about all this. These players and schools are so far removed from the real world it's not even funny. It's Phil Knight versus Les Wexner. It's money versus money, ESPN versus ESPN2. hype versus hype-ier. the more I hear, the less of a shit I give. I'll be rooting for Oregon, but I think osu wins handily... but my prediction is I won't know the result until I wake up Tuesday.
Except for the fact that Wexner doesn't give money to athletics. I think Oregon would be a lot better university if Knight worried less about buying them a football program and more about building them world class visual arts and medical centers.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 12:33 PM
OUPride wrote:expand_more
I just don't think there is anything "college" about all this. These players and schools are so far removed from the real world it's not even funny. It's Phil Knight versus Les Wexner. It's money versus money, ESPN versus ESPN2. hype versus hype-ier. the more I hear, the less of a shit I give. I'll be rooting for Oregon, but I think osu wins handily... but my prediction is I won't know the result until I wake up Tuesday.

I think Oregon would be a lot better university if Knight worried less about...
If you are so worried about it, why don't you do it yourself?
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 1:14 PM
OUPride wrote:expand_more
I just don't think there is anything "college" about all this. These players and schools are so far removed from the real world it's not even funny. It's Phil Knight versus Les Wexner. It's money versus money, ESPN versus ESPN2. hype versus hype-ier. the more I hear, the less of a shit I give. I'll be rooting for Oregon, but I think osu wins handily... but my prediction is I won't know the result until I wake up Tuesday.
Except for the fact that Wexner doesn't give money to athletics. I think Oregon would be a lot better university if Knight worried less about buying them a football program and more about building them world class visual arts and medical centers.
Les Wexner and his wife would like a word with you: http://www.eyethink.com/projects/view/18
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/sports/2007/09/10...
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 2:15 PM
History shows that with few exceptions, the team with the best player wins this game. Also, as Bobcatbob commented, I think Jones tries to do too much (or if they fall behind is asked to do too much). Oregon 38 - OSU 21
OUPride
General User
OUP
Member Since: 9/21/2010
Post Count: 578
person
mail
OUPride
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 2:17 PM
D.A. wrote:expand_more
I just don't think there is anything "college" about all this. These players and schools are so far removed from the real world it's not even funny. It's Phil Knight versus Les Wexner. It's money versus money, ESPN versus ESPN2. hype versus hype-ier. the more I hear, the less of a shit I give. I'll be rooting for Oregon, but I think osu wins handily... but my prediction is I won't know the result until I wake up Tuesday.
Except for the fact that Wexner doesn't give money to athletics. I think Oregon would be a lot better university if Knight worried less about buying them a football program and more about building them world class visual arts and medical centers.
Les Wexner and his wife would like a word with you
Doesn't disprove my point one bit. So his wife made a $5M donation to name an athletic building after him for his birthday, which admittedly I didn't know. That is literally a drop in the bucket in the context of over $200M in lifetime giving.

My point stands that Oregon would be much better off as a university if Phil Knight shared Wexner's philosophy and priorities instead of plowing over $200M into an athletic department, particularly for a university that doesn't have an endowment much bigger than Ohio's.

He and Knight do, however, share a fondness for sweatshop labor.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 2:20 PM
You Phil Knight has any interest other than marketing Nike via his alma mater and maybe winning a few trophies in the process?
Steve
General User
S
Member Since: 12/1/2005
Post Count: 713
person
mail
Steve
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 2:21 PM
Bobcatbob wrote:expand_more
You aren't a fan of college football if this game doesn't interest you. I would watch if Houston was playing Hawai'i. Having a team that I have some passing familiarity with in it is just icing on the cake. The good news is that the absence of any rooting interest makes it pure enjoyment.

Two things I think I think.

1. Cardale Jones playing his 3rd game and having had success is likely to try "to do too much" as the saying goes. Whether it's committing turnovers or plays breaking down too soon, look for some disarray from the Buckeyes, which could be fatal.

2. And, if OSU doesn't turn over Oregon, I think the Ducks' offense is more than the A&M defense can handle.

If OSU plays under control and wins the turnover battle, I think they win impressively.
Well, I guess I'm not a fan of college football.
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 2:29 PM
OUPride wrote:expand_more
I just don't think there is anything "college" about all this. These players and schools are so far removed from the real world it's not even funny. It's Phil Knight versus Les Wexner. It's money versus money, ESPN versus ESPN2. hype versus hype-ier. the more I hear, the less of a shit I give. I'll be rooting for Oregon, but I think osu wins handily... but my prediction is I won't know the result until I wake up Tuesday.
Except for the fact that Wexner doesn't give money to athletics. I think Oregon would be a lot better university if Knight worried less about buying them a football program and more about building them world class visual arts and medical centers.
Les Wexner and his wife would like a word with you
Doesn't disprove my point one bit. So his wife made a $5M donation to name an athletic building after him for his birthday, which admittedly I didn't know. That is literally a drop in the bucket in the context of over $200M in lifetime giving.

My point stands that Oregon would be much better off as a university if Phil Knight shared Wexner's philosophy and priorities instead of plowing over $200M into an athletic department, particularly for a university that doesn't have an endowment much bigger than Ohio's.

He and Knight do, however, share a fondness for sweatshop labor.
How about this: preparing a $1B gift to academics at Oregon:
http://www.bizjournals.com/portland/blog/threads_and_lace...


Or this, $300MM to date, and only a portion to athletics:
http://www.oregonlive.com/education/index.ssf/2014/10/hug...
Last Edited: 1/12/2015 2:37:49 PM by D.A.
Ryan Carey
Site Programmer
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Post Count: 993
mail
Ryan Carey
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 4:31 PM
OUPride wrote:expand_more
Except for the fact that Wexner doesn't give money to athletics. I think Oregon would be a lot better university if Knight worried less about buying them a football program and more about building them world class visual arts and medical centers.
Knight has given $225M and pledged another $500M to the Oregon Health & Science University (which looks like it's not affiliated with U of O?)

Quote:expand_more
Oregon Health & Science University is a nationally prominent research university and Oregon’s only public academic health center. Its hospitals and clinics serve more than a quarter of a million patients every year with innovative care and treatment models based on the latest knowledge available.

http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2013/09/phil...

So to say he only gives to U of O's football program isn't true.
Mike Johnson
General User
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: North Canton, OH
Post Count: 1,756
mail
Mike Johnson
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 5:20 PM
D.A. wrote:expand_more
I just don't think there is anything "college" about all this. These players and schools are so far removed from the real world it's not even funny. It's Phil Knight versus Les Wexner. It's money versus money, ESPN versus ESPN2. hype versus hype-ier. the more I hear, the less of a shit I give. I'll be rooting for Oregon, but I think osu wins handily... but my prediction is I won't know the result until I wake up Tuesday.
Except for the fact that Wexner doesn't give money to athletics. I think Oregon would be a lot better university if Knight worried less about buying them a football program and more about building them world class visual arts and medical centers.
Les Wexner and his wife would like a word with you
Doesn't disprove my point one bit. So his wife made a $5M donation to name an athletic building after him for his birthday, which admittedly I didn't know. That is literally a drop in the bucket in the context of over $200M in lifetime giving.

My point stands that Oregon would be much better off as a university if Phil Knight shared Wexner's philosophy and priorities instead of plowing over $200M into an athletic department, particularly for a university that doesn't have an endowment much bigger than Ohio's.

He and Knight do, however, share a fondness for sweatshop labor.
How about this: preparing a $1B gift to academics at Oregon:
http://www.bizjournals.com/portland/blog/threads_and_lace...


Or this, $300MM to date, and only a portion to athletics:
http://www.oregonlive.com/education/index.ssf/2014/10/hug...
Knight also has been generous to Stanford where he earned his MBA. Check the name of Stanford's Graduate School of Business.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,801
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 7:13 PM
OUPride wrote:expand_more
I just don't think there is anything "college" about all this. These players and schools are so far removed from the real world it's not even funny. It's Phil Knight versus Les Wexner. It's money versus money, ESPN versus ESPN2. hype versus hype-ier. the more I hear, the less of a shit I give. I'll be rooting for Oregon, but I think osu wins handily... but my prediction is I won't know the result until I wake up Tuesday.
Except for the fact that Wexner doesn't give money to athletics. I think Oregon would be a lot better university if Knight worried less about buying them a football program and more about building them world class visual arts and medical centers.
Now damn you OUPRIDE, why are you bringing facts into this.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 7:22 PM
Mike Johnson wrote:expand_more
I just don't think there is anything "college" about all this. These players and schools are so far removed from the real world it's not even funny. It's Phil Knight versus Les Wexner. It's money versus money, ESPN versus ESPN2. hype versus hype-ier. the more I hear, the less of a shit I give. I'll be rooting for Oregon, but I think osu wins handily... but my prediction is I won't know the result until I wake up Tuesday.
Except for the fact that Wexner doesn't give money to athletics. I think Oregon would be a lot better university if Knight worried less about buying them a football program and more about building them world class visual arts and medical centers.
Les Wexner and his wife would like a word with you
Doesn't disprove my point one bit. So his wife made a $5M donation to name an athletic building after him for his birthday, which admittedly I didn't know. That is literally a drop in the bucket in the context of over $200M in lifetime giving.

My point stands that Oregon would be much better off as a university if Phil Knight shared Wexner's philosophy and priorities instead of plowing over $200M into an athletic department, particularly for a university that doesn't have an endowment much bigger than Ohio's.

He and Knight do, however, share a fondness for sweatshop labor.
How about this: preparing a $1B gift to academics at Oregon:
http://www.bizjournals.com/portland/blog/threads_and_lace...


Or this, $300MM to date, and only a portion to athletics:
http://www.oregonlive.com/education/index.ssf/2014/10/hug...
Knight also has been generous to Stanford where he earned his MBA. Check the name of Stanford's Graduate School of Business.
To hear the administration, the wealthy just don't give their share. They are just selfish and need to pay more and more taxes. Me I keep seeing examples of the wealthy being extremely generous and doing more for us with their gifts than the government.
MonroeClassmate
General User
MC
Member Since: 8/31/2010
Post Count: 2,325
person
mail
MonroeClassmate
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 9:59 PM
So much for O$U NEVER going under center!
Casper71
General User
C71
Member Since: 12/1/2006
Post Count: 3,237
person
mail
Casper71
mail
Posted: 1/12/2015 11:21 PM
And how many times can you run the exact same play with the exact same result. I love tight ends pulling with a good angle and guards pulling with a good angle. It makes the running game so much easier than the zone blocking. Wow, is this the men versus the boys or what. Going to be fun to watch the ducks throw the ball all over the field now.
Last Edited: 1/12/2015 11:36:33 PM by Casper71
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,801
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 1/13/2015 12:33 AM
MonroeClassmate wrote:expand_more
So much for O$U NEVER going under center!
Trick play

Go Bucks!
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 33
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)