Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Cost of attendance
Page: 1 of 1
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 5/20/2015 10:47 PM
I may have missed it, but what is the MAC and more specifically Ohio doing about cost of attendance? I see that most Mtn West schools are going to be paying $3000-$5000 per year to full ride athletes. The cost of competing is going up as expected.
Last Edited: 5/21/2015 8:02:01 AM by colobobcat66
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,821
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 5/21/2015 7:01 AM
The MAC is doing what they do best: nothing.

Honestly, I don't know. But I wouldn't be surprised.
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,948
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 5/21/2015 8:14 AM

The MAC in October announced it would support cost of attendance.

It reiterated its position in January: http://www.mac-sports.com/news/2015/1/18/FB_0118153038.aspx

colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 5/21/2015 9:21 AM
Ted Thompson wrote:expand_more
The MAC in October announced it would support cost of attendance.
It reiterated its position in January: http://www.mac-sports.com/news/2015/1/18/FB_0118153038.aspx

Thanks, Ted, I couldn't quite remember what had been said. Old age, I guess.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 5/21/2015 11:33 AM
Ted Thompson wrote:expand_more
The MAC in October announced it would support cost of attendance.
It reiterated its position in January: http://www.mac-sports.com/news/2015/1/18/FB_0118153038.aspx
Here is the key line:

We will support the legislation that redefines an athletics grant-in-aid to include the cost of attendance."

What it doesn't say though is that they will fund it. Big difference. Personally I don't support this on a unilateral basis. I think it should be need based.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 5/21/2015 1:32 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
The MAC in October announced it would support cost of attendance.
It reiterated its position in January: http://www.mac-sports.com/news/2015/1/18/FB_0118153038.aspx
Here is the key line:

We will support the legislation that redefines an athletics grant-in-aid to include the cost of attendance."

What it doesn't say though is that they will fund it. Big difference. Personally I don't support this on a unilateral basis. I think it should be need based.

I'm not sure that there is a big difference. I would assume that when they say "support" that they are inferring that they will do it in practice. Why would they act like that they were supporting it without backing it up? That charade would become obvious pretty quickly.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,697
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 5/21/2015 5:33 PM
This will gobble up some of the new revenue stream from the playoff system.
Showing Messages: 1 - 7 of 7
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)