Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Report on new ex-Michigan tight end
Page: 1 of 2
akroncat
General User
A
Member Since: 7/23/2010
Location: Akron, OH
Post Count: 197
person
mail
akroncat
mail
Posted: 7/23/2015 11:49 AM
Found this online this morning. Very interesting.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/ex-michig...
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 7/23/2015 3:27 PM
OUr new TE made a wise decision. A shame Michigan did him that way, but, he seems to know how to land on his feet. The offense just added another player.
OhioStunter
General User
Member Since: 2/18/2005
Location: Chicago
Post Count: 2,516
mail
OhioStunter
mail
Posted: 7/23/2015 5:08 PM
Great that he's on board at Ohio. Is that commonplace to make 5th-year players "try out" for the team?

On one hand, a new coach coming in may feel like the 5th-year players got their degree as promised and want to look for the best talent to round out the team.

On the other hand, it sends a poor message to others who want to dedicate 5 years to the program but are now cautious about what it means for that final year.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 7/23/2015 5:23 PM
I think their loss could be a BIG gain for us. We bring back 5 starters on the o-line and now we get to throw in a 5th year tight end with experience startng at a major program? This offense is going to bulldoze down the field.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 7/23/2015 8:39 PM
OhioStunter wrote:expand_more
Great that he's on board at Ohio. Is that commonplace to make 5th-year players "try out" for the team?

On one hand, a new coach coming in may feel like the 5th-year players got their degree as promised and want to look for the best talent to round out the team.

On the other hand, it sends a poor message to others who want to dedicate 5 years to the program but are now cautious about what it means for that final year.
Considering the past four years under Hoke were progressively worse (11-2, 8-5, 7-6, 5-7) I can see why Harbaugh might not be impressed with fifth-years. If he has the right attitude -- and I assume he will have, or Solich wouldn't take a chance with him -- he will be a great asset for blocking and should help anchor the receiving corps.
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 7/23/2015 10:12 PM
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
I think their loss could be a BIG gain for us. We bring back 5 starters on the o-line and now we get to throw in a 5th year tight end with experience startng at a major program? This offense is going to bulldoze down the field.
Offensively I don't know how much he will contribute. Didn't he spend most of his career at Michigan as a defensive end? Either way, his addition could be a plus for the program.
Bobcat Grad 86
General User
BG86
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 1,397
person
mail
Bobcat Grad 86
mail
Posted: 7/23/2015 10:25 PM
Our friends son is a red-shirt freshman QB at Michigan and they indicated that almost every aspect of the program is much more intense than before including an offensive playbook that is about three times the size of the Hoke playbook.
Last Edited: 7/23/2015 10:29:34 PM by Bobcat Grad 86
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 7/23/2015 10:36 PM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
Great that he's on board at Ohio. Is that commonplace to make 5th-year players "try out" for the team?

On one hand, a new coach coming in may feel like the 5th-year players got their degree as promised and want to look for the best talent to round out the team.

On the other hand, it sends a poor message to others who want to dedicate 5 years to the program but are now cautious about what it means for that final year.
Considering the past four years under Hoke were progressively worse (11-2, 8-5, 7-6, 5-7) I can see why Harbaugh might not be impressed with fifth-years. If he has the right attitude -- and I assume he will have, or Solich wouldn't take a chance with him -- he will be a great asset for blocking and should help anchor the receiving corps.

The only gain that Harbaugh gets from chasing away the fifth year players is that he gets to use 3 scholarships a year earlier than he otherwise would, in exchange for a somewhat tacky move. The bigger question is what impact it will have on the other players. Will it put fear into them, and make them work harder? Will it negatively impact morale? Will people use it against him in recruiting?

In any case, if he follows in the footsteps of Talbert, and gives Ohio a solid TE to work into the rotation, this will help Ohio.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 7/24/2015 1:25 AM
Mark Lembright '85 wrote:expand_more
I think their loss could be a BIG gain for us. We bring back 5 starters on the o-line and now we get to throw in a 5th year tight end with experience startng at a major program? This offense is going to bulldoze down the field.
Offensively I don't know how much he will contribute. Didn't he spend most of his career at Michigan as a defensive end? Either way, his addition could be a plus for the program.
He did start at DE then switched to TE following a lack of depth at that spot due in part from some injuries. Still, I think he is more of a TE now. That is where our need is greater and he was pretty good blocking last year.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 7/24/2015 6:23 PM
We need TE receiver difference maker, not just the blocking.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 7/24/2015 6:50 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
We need TE receiver difference maker, not just the blocking.
Right, Michigan's blocking TE from last season offers himself to Ohio and Ohio should have held out for some pie in the sky difference maker? Easy to say any team needs difference makers at any position. Blocking TEs improve first down, leading to easier second & third down. More muscle in the red zone is always a plus. Hell, more muscle is always a plus, period. No?
OhioStunter
General User
Member Since: 2/18/2005
Location: Chicago
Post Count: 2,516
mail
OhioStunter
mail
Posted: 7/24/2015 8:46 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
We need TE receiver difference maker, not just the blocking.
Unless he excels at blocking for Beau up the middle.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,800
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 7/24/2015 9:17 PM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
Great that he's on board at Ohio. Is that commonplace to make 5th-year players "try out" for the team?

On one hand, a new coach coming in may feel like the 5th-year players got their degree as promised and want to look for the best talent to round out the team.

On the other hand, it sends a poor message to others who want to dedicate 5 years to the program but are now cautious about what it means for that final year.
Considering the past four years under Hoke were progressively worse (11-2, 8-5, 7-6, 5-7) I can see why Harbaugh might not be impressed with fifth-years. If he has the right attitude -- and I assume he will have, or Solich wouldn't take a chance with him -- he will be a great asset for blocking and should help anchor the receiving corps.
Yeah because we've never taken chances? Not making the comparison, I know the young man and people who have coached him, he's a quality person and pick up. But don't even begin to think we don't take chances. On questionable character.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 7/24/2015 10:09 PM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
We need TE receiver difference maker, not just the blocking.
Right, Michigan's blocking TE from last season offers himself to Ohio and Ohio should have held out for some pie in the sky difference maker? Easy to say any team needs difference makers at any position. Blocking TEs improve first down, leading to easier second & third down. More muscle in the red zone is always a plus. Hell, more muscle is always a plus, period. No?

What's wrong with you.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 7/25/2015 12:27 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
We need TE receiver difference maker, not just the blocking.
Right, Michigan's blocking TE from last season offers himself to Ohio and Ohio should have held out for some pie in the sky difference maker? Easy to say any team needs difference makers at any position. Blocking TEs improve first down, leading to easier second & third down. More muscle in the red zone is always a plus. Hell, more muscle is always a plus, period. No?

What's wrong with you.
Last Edited: 7/25/2015 6:45:36 AM by Bcat2
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 7/25/2015 9:32 AM
Nothing wrong with a road-grader TE/H back. But I agree with Monroe that if you think of TEs/H backs as only road graders, you limit your options on offense.

There was a thread a couple months back on the single wing offense. LC asked why we couldn't do something similar with our offense. I hate to make the reference b/c I know the general reaction to the subject on BA, but go watch what Urban Meyer does with the H back position in osu's offense. It's much more of a RB/WR skillset than a blocking TE skillset, and it creates a lot of opportunities for offensive wrinkles similar to the single wing.

That being said, I'm sure Mr. Heitzman will be a fine addition to the team, although part of me wishes he was lining up on the defense instead.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 7/25/2015 9:43 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
We need TE receiver difference maker, not just the blocking.
I'd love a 6-6 Gronk-esque pass catching speedster capable of mistmatches down the field to open up the passing game.

That doesn't change the fact that I am also excited about our running game this year. Our offensive line is going to open up holes for our stable of backs and that will open up the passing game.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 7/25/2015 10:10 AM
How many people remember last year, before the Marshall game, when Doc Holliday commented about Ohio's tight ends:
Doc Holliday wrote:expand_more
They do a great job, offensively, of tailoring what they’re doing to their personnel. They’re not as much three-tight-end stuff this year because they don’t have those physical tight ends they’ve had in the past, but they do a great job with the wideouts they have, getting the guys that can make plays, either running backs or the wideouts.

They’ve played a lot of wideouts, about nine. They’ve played three or four running backs, they’ve basically played only the one tight end, No. 82 [Troy Mangen], because of their numbers. They do a great job of not putting round pegs in square holes and trying to match their offense to what their personnel can do.


I translated that out of coach-speak to english and got:
"Ohio is somewhat limited in what they can offensively this year because they have a real weak spot at tight end, where they lack the big powerful tight ends they have had in the past, and because they don't have their usual numbers of tight ends. As a result they can't run their usual 2-3 tight end sets, and are forced to try to get variety by using a lot more wide receivers".

So, now we're complaining about adding a big, powerful tight end? Don't get me wrong, I love having an Andrew Mooney or Troy Hill around, but I'll take a Jordan Thompson any day. I want a TE that can block, and one that can catch the ball in traffic when it's needed. The ability to get extra yards after the catch is a bonus, not essential, at least as far as I'm concerned.
Andrew_Mooney
General User
AM
Member Since: 11/11/2006
Post Count: 7
person
mail
Andrew_Mooney
mail
Posted: 7/25/2015 12:48 PM
Hey, I blocked ... occasionally :)
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 7/25/2015 3:57 PM
Moondoggy wrote:expand_more
Hey, I blocked ... occasionally :)

Hehe, and David Carter caught passes.... occasionally. You guys made a good pair.

If anyone doubts that you blocked, the highlight film I posted earlier shows you catching TD after TD, but, while it's not always easy to read numbers because the film is so blurry, I believe it also caught you blocking a few times:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wr4hg_n6WkA
2:37
2:49
4:18
5:08
5:21
5.45
Last Edited: 7/25/2015 5:06:13 PM by L.C.
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 7/25/2015 10:18 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
How many people remember last year, before the Marshall game, when Doc Holliday commented about Ohio's tight ends:
They do a great job, offensively, of tailoring what they’re doing to their personnel. They’re not as much three-tight-end stuff this year because they don’t have those physical tight ends they’ve had in the past, but they do a great job with the wideouts they have, getting the guys that can make plays, either running backs or the wideouts.

They’ve played a lot of wideouts, about nine. They’ve played three or four running backs, they’ve basically played only the one tight end, No. 82 [Troy Mangen], because of their numbers. They do a great job of not putting round pegs in square holes and trying to match their offense to what their personnel can do.


I translated that out of coach-speak to english and got:
"Ohio is somewhat limited in what they can offensively this year because they have a real weak spot at tight end, where they lack the big powerful tight ends they have had in the past, and because they don't have their usual numbers of tight ends. As a result they can't run their usual 2-3 tight end sets, and are forced to try to get variety by using a lot more wide receivers".

So, now we're complaining about adding a big, powerful tight end? Don't get me wrong, I love having an Andrew Mooney or Troy Hill around, but I'll take a Jordan Thompson any day. I want a TE that can block, and one that can catch the ball in traffic when it's needed. The ability to get extra yards after the catch is a bonus, not essential, at least as far as I'm concerned.
No need to defend this young man. There are some on this board that if we got a running back that averaged 4.9 yards a carry they would complain we need a back that averages 5 Yards.

Welcome young man enjoy your time at Ohio and make us proud. Glad you are part of the University
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 7/25/2015 10:47 PM
cc-cat wrote:expand_more
No need to defend this young man. There are some on this board that if we got a running back that averaged 4.9 yards a carry they would complain we need a back that averages 5 Yards.

Welcome young man enjoy your time at Ohio and make us proud. Glad you are part of the University

It's all in fun. No one seriously questions whether he blocked in addition to catching TD passes. He was a good one.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 7/25/2015 11:53 PM
Moondoggy was totally solid.

No one objects to a TE who can block it. But think how much better we are, how much things open up for running and passing..more and more, in a repeating cycle..if our TE is a pass catching threat.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,800
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 7/26/2015 11:11 AM
A great running game makes an effective passing game! And a true TE needs to be a blocker first in most offensive schemes.
Bobcatzblitz
General User
B
Member Since: 7/21/2010
Post Count: 1,777
person
mail
Bobcatzblitz
mail
Posted: 7/28/2015 5:08 PM
Yes another Moondoggy and Jordan THompson would be nice!!
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 27
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)