Fair question; start here.
Those Herd teams, as I recall, were not "average." Didn't they have some some years of undefeated. And, as I said then and still insist, I don't care who you are, if you go undefeated, you are a top 10 and probably top four team. It's incredibly difficult to do. THose were very, very good Herd teams.
We played Herd pretty tough. They were just better than us.
I was at Grobe's last home game in Athens against Herd. (I think that was his last game with us.) We thumped Herd but good. As I recall we won by about 10 and killed the last couple of minutes right at their goal line. Brinker was terrific that game.
We were poised to compete for the MAC title the next year. Then, Knorr.
Was there a MAC title game then...or just a regular season?
Grobe was dynamic and his teams were exciting. I know objectively, those are not relevant. But they are, they just are.
And the state of the program when Grobe entered was vastly inferior compared to when the current staff came on.
I definitely was not implying Herd was "average" in general, but they were average that season. I believe they were 6-6 or 7-5 going into the MAC title game. That was Leftwich's first year as a starter, and he was good, but hadn't yet established dominance. Good for them for stepping up and beating a favored WMU team. I agree, those were some great teams, and most years they were just better. but 2000 was their down year, just after Chad P graduated.
Brinker was awesome, then he had brain surgery. unfortunate for Knorr as his presence might have provided some stability while he ... uh... learned to coach.
We were poised to compete for a MAC title the next year... but it would have gone through Huntington against a much better Herd team. No Brinker. No guarantees.
I agree that Grobe was dynamic in some ways, and we had a system that was designed to make us competitive with what we had as we tried to build a program. but still very flawed. More frustrating sometimes than the inability to come back was how we would jump out to two- or three-score leads, but once the defenses caught up to what we were doing, we were dead in the water. We didn't adjust. and we certainly couldn't throw when there was any suspicion we might throw. Frankly it was just baffling to me how some teams looked like a deer in the headlights (Kansas State 97, EMU, pick a year, BG multiple times) trying to stop the option and others seemed to know everything we were going to do before we did it and completely smother it (Marshall 97, wisconsin 98, and several Miami teams)
I agree completely that Grobe inherited a very different situation... I hold him in the highest regard for bringing OHIO Football back from the dead. But by year 6 & 7, was it acceptable that Marshall was "just better" but not acceptable now that Toledo, NIU and those CMU teams were just better? All programs with far more tradition/history better facilities, more fertile recruiting ground? Do you see where I'm going? If we get healthy, we could go 10-2 or 11-1 and meet Toledo in the MAC title game. If we lose, I'm going to be PISSED! But after I cool down, I'll have to admit that Toledo was better because right now I think they're better and not much will change between now and December. Will that be evidence of coaching incompetence? If we go 9-3 and don't win the East, will that be?