Maryland
UCF, in all likelihood

I'm gonna say Virginia, Iowa State and Hawaii for sure, barring any major turnarounds.

Miami is an interesting case. Golden inherited a program in the middle of an NCAA investigation and never got his feet set with recruiting. Now that the investigation is over, he can recruit. I think we might see some improvement from them if they keep him in place. The last thing they need is more turnover.

On the flip side, coaches who might move up:

Fuente (Memphis)
Rhule (Temple)
Addazio (B.C.) - I only bring him up because imagine the D he could create with better players than BC has.
Herman (Houston)
Fleck (WMU)
Campbell (Toledo)
Harsin (Boise State)
Graham (Arizona State) - he's always ready to leave

I thought it would be interesting to compare the lists of coaches who might get fired, and the list of coaches who might move up to my list comparing actual results on the field to recruiting, which was: http://tinyurl.com/o8jexy7

Coaches Already Fired, Retired, resigned, or otherwise no longer coaching:
USC +8 (fired for off-the-field issues)
Illinois +7 (fired for off-the-field issues)
North Texas -21
South Carolina -40
Maryland -49

Hot Seat:
Iowa State +4
Idaho -2
Georgia State -4
New Mexico State -17
UCF -21
Hawaii -21
Purdue -26
Miami, FL -37
Virginia -52

Your list of people that might move up:
Harsin (Boise State) +47
Campbell (Toledo) +45
Fuente (Memphis) +34
Herman (Houston) +20
Rhule (Temple) +19
Addazio (B.C.) +11
Fleck (WMU) -6
Graham (Arizona State) -10

There is obviously a relationship here, and I guess it's not surprising that they are related. Coaches that don't get the results you would expect from their recruits would need to be exceptional recruiters in order to succeed. Thus the only people on you list of candidates to move up that have negative numbers are exceptional recruiters that have only slightly negative numbers (like Fleck). Conversely people that get a lot out of the players that they have are always candidates to move up.

Applying the same principle, lets look at the coaches at the bottom of my other list who are not listed above. Are these schools also potential job openings for TOS?
Texas: Strong, 2d year, -63
Kansas: Beatty, 1st year, -55
Rutgers: Flood, 4th year, -46
USF: Taggart, 3rd year, -46
Auburn: Malzahn, 3rd year, -39
SMU: Morris, 1st year, -30
Oregon: Helfrich, 3rd year, -30
FAU: Partridge, 2d year, -29
Vandy: Mason, 2d year, -27

I suspect that many fans of these teams are not happy, but since all of these are relatively new coaches, they safe for now, especially if some of their other years have been better.

And, at the other end of the list I posted in the other thread, are these candidates to move up?
Navy: +75 Niumatalolo, 9th year
Georgia Southern: +52 Fritz, 2d year
W. Kentucky: +49 Brohm, 2d year
Utah State: +48 Wells, 3rd year
Appalachian State: +42 Satterfield, 3rd year
Kansas State, Snyder +37, 24th year
Louisiana Tech: +37 Holtz, 3rd year
Utah: Whittingham, 10th year
Georgia Tech: Johnson, 7th year
MTSU: Stockstill, 10th year

In most cases they are probably too new of a head coach to get a job offer to move up, or at the other extreme, they are coaches who have been in their current job a long time, and who aren't likely to move. Usually the big schools want to see a 3-4 year track record before they sign to give away the big bucks. Give a couple of these guys another good year next year, and they'll be moving on up.

Typo- the Old Ball Coach at South Carolina was not fired. He never had a losing season ever at South Carolina and went 11-2 in 2011, 2012 and 2013. He just couldn't get the level of talent to come to South Carolina when competing against Alabama, Auburn, LSU, Georgia and the others. The biggest problem was the same as Ohio which was getting an elite QB, I compare the 3 really good years at USC with Connor Shaw and Ohio with TT were almost clones of each other. South Carolina football and Ohio football programs are extremely similar in that the East Division of the SEC/MAC are the weak divisions and South Carolina only won their division once and lost one championship. The West Divison in both conferences have dominated with 3-4 strong teams in recent history and Georgia in the east is to USC is like BG is to Ohio.

I edited my post above to say "Coaches already fired or retired". Thanks for the correction.

Here's an interesting article on Spurrier:
http://tinyurl.com/o4lgqht
It points out Spurrier's perspective, that "You could take favorable jobs as a bad coach and look okay, or take great jobs as a good coach and look orders of magnitude better than you might actually be" but that if you really want to be considered a good coach, the much harder challenge is to win at a school without a tradition of winning.

LC, Spurrier specifically said that he is resigning, not retiring, and didn't know if he'd coach again. Want to change the post again?

LC, I didn't mean to sound like I was complaining, I was actually making fun of Spurriers take on his leaving and talking about consulting or whatever in the future. Pretty funny to me.