I disagree completely. Muffing a punt vs OSU or CMU at Homecoming are decisive plays in a game. Going four and out at mid-field in a scoreless game where neither offense has found its footing may be a turning point but not a decisive play. The odds are had OHIO punted it and downed at the 1, WMU would have just added 50 yards to their total run stats considering 7 straight TD drives.
In the what-if category, why wouldn't a dropped bomb or one barely out of reach in the scoreless match be as equally as decisive?
There is no snowball when a team is bigger, faster, quicker and wants it more than the other team. Give WMU their due. In two years, one at home and the other away, they have proven that OHIO is not their equal.
No turnovers in a 49 point showing is absolutely amazing.
The Western team on the field is what Solich would like to have on his side. No razzle dazzle; efficient and seldom passing coupled with smash mouth running. On the defensive side, db's and linebackers that give NO cushion (our guys except for the bombs were covered like gloves). And a D line that stops the run, isn't fooled with an option and makes tackles. The only thing Western wasn't good at was putting pressure on our QB--mostly had ample time.
On BA I don't expect everyone to agree with me - which is a central reason why I enjoy BA. Indeed, in my leadership positions, I encouraged discussion, debate and disagreement, believing that they enrich thinking and lead to better decisions.
Back to the 4th and 1. I applauded the decision to go for it. It was sending in Oulette to run from the ensuing formation that had me concluding it was the decisive play. My guess? When the Cats lined up to run that play, they knew their chances of succeeding were slim. In other words, expecting failure.
Had the Cats successfully converted on that 4th and 1, I tend to think we would have seen a vastly different outcome.