Ohio Football Topic
Topic: OT: Is ESPN pricing itself out of the market?
Page: 1 of 1
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 10/21/2015 9:23 AM
Rising programming costs and declining subscribership is causing Disney to cut up to 350 jobs at ESPN. The MAC deal is part (although a small part) of ESPN's $68 billion commitment in long-term programming costs (this includes last year's NBA deal). And as subscribership goes down, so will ad revenue. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-20/disney-...
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
mail
OU_Country
mail
Posted: 10/21/2015 9:29 AM
Fox posted a thought in regards to this over the summer. Consider the source given its from an ESPN competitor, but it points out similar things. Because of these enormous rights fees, ESPN is in trouble if the trend toward cutting the cable continues.


http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-cov...
Chuck_IV
General User
CIV
Member Since: 1/20/2005
Location: CT
Post Count: 198
person
mail
Chuck_IV
mail
Posted: 10/21/2015 12:49 PM
ESPN has themselves between a rock and a hard place too. They are currently suing Verizon for breech of contract for not including ESPN as part of a "skinny" bundle.

With that said, if ESPN tries to start their own stand alone streaming service, ala HBO Now, then that will give ammo to Verizon to defend itself wih and give opportunities for others to start excluding ESPN for certain packages, to keep costs down for their customers.

ESPN, aka. Disney if fighting a losing battle.
Last Edited: 10/21/2015 12:51:26 PM by Chuck_IV
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 10/21/2015 1:29 PM
Live sports on ESPN is probably the only thing keeping me hooked up to cable at this point. There's probably only half a dozen shows on maybe 4 other networks my family watches. I'd switch to a combo of Netflix/GooglePlay/whatever and a standalone ESPN online service in a heartbeat, even at the prices that Fox Sports article quotes.

Are there 30 million more people like me? I think there are. 2013 seems like ancient history when you look at the growth of streaming services.
brucecuth
General User
B
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 1,855
person
mail
brucecuth
mail
Posted: 10/21/2015 3:55 PM
as the bloomberg piece states, ESPN is still making money, and would have done so even if there were no layoffs. Just not making as much as The Mouse had hoped.

The worst thing that happened to them was Fox Sports, and to a much lesser extent CBSSN and NBCSN. Competition from Fox along with the fact that live sports is something advertisers value, has really driven up rights fees.

As far as cuts are concerned, I wonder how much of this is fat vs. meat. Do they really need to be doing Sportscenter live from LA 5 nites a week? No.

And an anecdote...

Heather Cox was in Cbus for the OSU Penn St. game this past weekend. On her twitter account Friday nite, she posted a pic of the menu from Hyde Park Steakhouse, one of the most expensive in the Midwest. If The Mouse/ESPN can afford expense account meals for sideline reporters at expensive steakhouses, then they're probably not doing all that bad...
ytownbobcat
General User
Y
Member Since: 8/7/2006
Post Count: 1,253
person
mail
ytownbobcat
mail
Posted: 10/21/2015 5:20 PM
Is that fat NCAAF contract sustainable over 12 years?
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 10/22/2015 1:22 PM
Many editors and producers will be laid off.

NFL Countdown will still have every living NFL coach ever fired and every former player who can put two syllables together trying out Chuckle Hut material each Sunday morning and cashing in seven-figure checks.

People ain't no good.
Last Edited: 10/22/2015 1:22:36 PM by Brian Smith (No, not that one)
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,820
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 10/22/2015 1:39 PM
C Money wrote:expand_more
Live sports on ESPN is probably the only thing keeping me hooked up to cable at this point. There's probably only half a dozen shows on maybe 4 other networks my family watches. I'd switch to a combo of Netflix/GooglePlay/whatever and a standalone ESPN online service in a heartbeat, even at the prices that Fox Sports article quotes.

Are there 30 million more people like me? I think there are. 2013 seems like ancient history when you look at the growth of streaming services.
I'm in your boat C Money.

If Sling TV had more sports channels like Fox Sports/CBS/NBC I'd switch to Roku/Sling TV yesterday. ESPN is good programming for Sling, but I want more variety.
Showing Messages: 1 - 8 of 8
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)