menu
Logo
Bobcat Attack Menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: UC and Marshall Renew Football Series
Page: 1 of 1
Maryland Bobcat
General User
Member Since: 12/28/2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Post Count: 169
mail
Maryland Bobcat
mail
Posted: 10/23/2015 2:24 PM
settings_applications edit_note
From: http://www.cincinnati.com/story/sports/college/university... /

MARSHALL SERIES: UC and Marshall on Thursday announced they will play a home-and-home football series. The teams will meet Sept. 23, 2017 at Nippert Stadium and at Marshall on Sept. 28, 2019. The two programs have met 12 times, most recently in 2008. UC leads the series 8-3-1.
LuckySparrow
General User
Member Since: 10/16/2012
Location: IL
Post Count: 1,814
mail
LuckySparrow
mail
Posted: 10/23/2015 5:20 PM
settings_applications edit_note
For some reason, this article reminded me of something else I saw today: Pittsburgh's AD says they won't schedule Home and Home matchups with non-Power 5 programs.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/pitt-ad--...
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,789
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 10/23/2015 5:43 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Deleted due to stupidly not reading link in Lucky's post before for posting.
Last Edited: 10/23/2015 5:45:55 PM by OhioCatFan
Flat Tire
General User
FT
Member Since: 12/24/2006
Post Count: 144
FT
mail
Flat Tire
mail
Posted: 10/27/2015 9:34 AM
settings_applications edit_note
FWIW, the Charleston Gazette is reporting a home and home for Boise and Marshall 2019 and 2020.
Dexcat
General User
Member Since: 11/6/2013
Post Count: 119
mail
Dexcat
mail
Posted: 10/28/2015 9:56 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Maybe the G5 teams should only play other G5 teams and force the NCAA or P5 hands. Then the P5 will have no "pushovers" and there will probably be undefeated G5 teams at the end of the season. Of course the money would just say the P5 schools are better at the end of the year, but all the unknown might stir up some controversy about the divisional make up.
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
M279801
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 10/28/2015 10:30 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Dexcat wrote:expand_more
Maybe the G5 teams should only play other G5 teams and force the NCAA or P5 hands. Then the P5 will have no "pushovers" and there will probably be undefeated G5 teams at the end of the season. Of course the money would just say the P5 schools are better at the end of the year, but all the unknown might stir up some controversy about the divisional make up.
If thats the approach, why not just implement straight-up promotion/relegation between P5/G5/FCS
Dexcat
General User
Member Since: 11/6/2013
Post Count: 119
mail
Dexcat
mail
Posted: 11/2/2015 4:09 PM
settings_applications edit_note
mf279801 wrote:expand_more
Maybe the G5 teams should only play other G5 teams and force the NCAA or P5 hands. Then the P5 will have no "pushovers" and there will probably be undefeated G5 teams at the end of the season. Of course the money would just say the P5 schools are better at the end of the year, but all the unknown might stir up some controversy about the divisional make up.
If thats the approach, why not just implement straight-up promotion/relegation between P5/G5/FCS
That's what I was trying to get at, albeit in a not great way.
Showing Messages: 1 - 7 of 7
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
MAC News Links
chevron_left
Tuesday, July 7, 2026
chevron_right



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)