If the discussion is just about whether it's a good program or not, or would we rather have our current situation than the way it used to be then it's an easy debate. If the topic is "Becoming the next Boise State", however, then I think we have to question the progress this program has made the last few years. It's clearly not progressing. Simply making bowl games these days is not a great measure of accomplishment when every program over .500 does the same.
The program in its current state is not an elite one in the MAC.
This is sooooo spot on! Well said. I agree 1000% we are better off than the Lictenberg/Knorr-era teams (Throw out the above-average success run of Jim Grobe)......but watching our program ascend to the Top 25....articles in SI....talk of being a possible BCS-Buster......and then watching it fall flat on it's face. It's tough to stomach. Like I said, it was in their grasp to make that "leap" to national relevance. We failed to cash in on that great opportunity. I blame a lot of that on the players at the end of the 2012 & 2013 season. They quit on the program. They had a chance to finish each of those seasons strong and push this program forward...but instead they laid down and quit.
You CANNOT lose three of your last four in each of those two years by combined scores of 123-16 (2013) & 106-47 (2012).....and in 2010 let a chance to win the MAC East go by the wayside in an embarassing 28-6 loss to hapless Kent.
That is the sign of a program that has yet to make the commitment to excellence (cue the Oakland Raiders music)
Coaches need to hold players accountable and push to make this program better....if not, they are accepting mediocrity and accepting their place as a "solid MAC program, firmly in the middle of the league"
It's just frustrating to watch us grow to heights never seen (or even thought possible) only to then turn around and watch them disinergrate. I think the commitment and heart is back with the players (we'll find out for sure Saturday at Buffalo if they are able to dig deep and regroup)....but I'm not sure the results are there. They have 5 games to prove me wrong.
FWIW....MAC Since 2012
NIU 25-2
BGSU 19-7
Toledo 18-6
Ball St 17-7
CMU 14-10
Buffalo 12-11
Ohio 12-12
Kent 12-12
WMU 9-15
Akron 7-17
Miami 5-19
UMass 5-19
EMU 3-21
vs. "MAC Elite" since 2012 (over. 500 teams)
NIU 9-2
Toledo 7-5
Ball St 5-6
BGSU 2-6
Kent 2-8
WMU 2-10
CMU 1-8
Akron 1-8
Buffalo 0-8
UMass 0-8
Ohio 0-10
Miami 0-10
EMU 0-15
vs. "MAC Non-Elite" since 2012 (.500 or below)
BGSU 17-1
NIU 16-0
CMU 13-2
Ball St 12-1
Ohio 12-2
Buffalo 12-3
Toledo 11-1
Kent 10-4
WMU 7-5
Akron 6-9
Miami 5-9
UMass 5-11
EMU 3-6
It's pretty obvious this is a top-heavy league....there are a LOT of bottom feeders....everyone feeds off the have-nots in this league....not just Ohio.
BUT C'MON....We're 0-10 vs. MAC teams over .500 since 2012?!?!?!
Not that BG is that much better at 2-6....but they have four less opportunities. Even Akron has a win....
This is not where our football program should be in this league. There is no reason to be 12-12 the last three seasons in the MAC (and staring down another potential 4-4 season)
We are TIED FOR 7TH in overall record in this league.....7th?!?!?!?! That is just sad. I'm sorry, you can call me a debbie-downer or whatever.....but I expect more from this program
Last Edited: 10/22/2015 12:56:45 PM by bshot44