Come with your venom toward me all you want. Because you can't use reasonable logic. Ron Hubbard--what are you talking about??
Not to consider the fact of averaging four losses a year by about 27 points each--really?
At some point Solich and staff will be gone. Will you then be happy if we hire a staff...well, a head coach...who's been at a school for 11 years and has averaged four losses a year by 27 points over his last three years?
Tell me why these losses don't matter. 12 games out of about 38 played over the last 3 years isn't significant?
This ain't cherry picking friends.
Keep blindly bringing the hate. Keep ignoring the import of fact.
Where to start? Hmmmmm ....
First, whomever you had for Quantitative Methods back in the day is rolling over in his grave with your total abuse of data. Either you analyze all the data or none of it. You do NOT decide what is relevant, especially if you're not knowledgeable in Statistics.
You accuse others of not using 'reasonable logic'? Now that is funny Monroe. You, on the other hand, use no logic at all.
Okay, let's keep beating a dead horse. Yes, 4 losses per year by 27 points. It's so bad we should drop football I guess. On the other hand you choose to apparently not consider the fact that we had some significant injuries in some of those losses. I guess losing Poling and others was irrelevant. We'd have lost equally bad if they had played.
And I'll tell you why the losses you obsess about don't matter. Because a loss is a loss. A team moves on to the next game. You, on the other hand, dwell on these losses for years apparently.
And not to be redundant, but it is cherry picking (data). Go back and review your QM 200 and 201 notes, after all that was introductory Stats.