Johnson 5'10" 180 vs Licata 6'2" 210. Can it be "size matters?"

Thanks. I used Wiki data. Shudda known better.

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/matt-johnson?id=25...


"Weaknesses Short quarterback gets shorter with side­arm release. Struggles to see over defenses and has too many balls batted. System stat-­piler. Struggles to drive throws and has to swing entire lower body through his throw like a pitcher. Won't be able to make all the NFL throws. Will hang onto ball too long. Took 35 sacks this season despite high percentage of short throws. Just over 68 percent of his attempts were inside of 10 yards. Poise in pocket is very average.
Draft Projection Undrafted free agent
Bottom Line Johnson rung up some very impressive passing numbers in Dino Babers' offense and took full advantage of the deep ball counters when they were available. His size is below the NFL norm and the arm strength is well below the line. Johnson lacks special mobility traits to make up for his physical deficiencies and might have to wait for a camp invite to get his shot.
-Lance Zierlein "

Well, no. Licata, the one the Bengals signed, threw for 212 w/0 TDs against Ohio. Vick threw for 321 in that game. The old song "Run the Ball, Stop the Run, Win the Game" applied in the Buffalo game. Buffalo outgained Ohio 161 to 54 rushing. Their defense added 4 Ints, two which were returned for TDs, singing another old song "Defense Wins." So against Buffalo at least it was not about QB play.

Johnson = Connor Shaw of the Browns. Both undersized with great college numbers but someone will put Johnson on their practice squad.