Ohio Football Topic
Topic: MAC schools in the AP All-Time Top 100
Page: 1 of 1
Tyler
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: AZ
Post Count: 894
mail
Tyler
mail
Posted: 8/3/2016 8:58 AM
http://collegefootball.ap.org/top-100

To determine the all-time Top 25, the AP formula counted poll appearances (one point) to mark consistency, No. 1 rankings (two points) to acknowledge elite programs and gave a bonus for AP championships (10 points).

#76 Toledo
#81 Miami
#96 Northern Illinois
#99 Bowling Green

Other notables:
#1 Ohio State
#81 Cincinnati
#91 Marshall
OUcats82
General User
Member Since: 1/9/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 1,912
mail
OUcats82
mail
Posted: 8/3/2016 9:09 AM
Iowa Pre-Flight must have been quite a powerhouse to have enough resonance to make the list! They only played three seasons in the 40s during WW2.
Bobcat Mac
General User
BM
Member Since: 2/4/2012
Location: Centerville, OH
Post Count: 140
person
mail
Bobcat Mac
mail
Posted: 8/3/2016 9:45 AM
Crazy to think how good the Minnesota Golden Gophers football program was!
Building the dome and moving off campus really did not help their situation.
OUcats82
General User
Member Since: 1/9/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 1,912
mail
OUcats82
mail
Posted: 8/3/2016 1:04 PM
Bobcat Mac wrote:expand_more
Crazy to think how good the Minnesota Golden Gophers football program was!
Building the dome and moving off campus really did not help their situation.
It has always been a bit of a head-scratcher for me too as to why Minnesota has struggled so much in football while a school like Wisconsin seems to always have a good to great season. One does not seem to have a particular advantage over the other at first glance in terms of location, weather etc. The Twin Cities are a much larger metro area than Milwaukee etc. The program Alvarez built obviously has been sustained by and large and that alone gives the Badgers the upper hand but I just feel like the U should be stronger than they are.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 8/3/2016 2:28 PM
Bobcat Mac wrote:expand_more
Crazy to think how good the Minnesota Golden Gophers football program was!
Building the dome and moving off campus really did not help their situation.

Minnesota was a national powerhouse in the pre-WWII era, but is well below .500 from 1942 onward. I understand that during the war years many teams were not the same, but as for why they did not return to where they were once the war was over, I have no idea.
That one crazy fan
General User
Member Since: 7/21/2010
Location: Iowa City, IA
Post Count: 491
mail
That one crazy fan
mail
Posted: 8/3/2016 8:42 PM
Sooo how is Miami ranked ahead of us?
Recovering Journalist
General User
RJ
Member Since: 8/17/2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Post Count: 1,864
person
mail
Recovering Journalist
mail
Posted: 8/3/2016 9:29 PM
That one crazy fan wrote:expand_more
Sooo how is Miami ranked ahead of us?
Because "all-time" does not mean "last 10 years."
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 8/4/2016 4:23 AM
If you want a more lengthy and particular explanation, let me know.

Or read my hundreds and hundreds of posts on Solich mediocre = Ohio mediocre.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,820
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 8/4/2016 7:05 AM
OUcats82 wrote:expand_more
Crazy to think how good the Minnesota Golden Gophers football program was!
Building the dome and moving off campus really did not help their situation.
It has always been a bit of a head-scratcher for me too as to why Minnesota has struggled so much in football while a school like Wisconsin seems to always have a good to great season. One does not seem to have a particular advantage over the other at first glance in terms of location, weather etc. The Twin Cities are a much larger metro area than Milwaukee etc. The program Alvarez built obviously has been sustained by and large and that alone gives the Badgers the upper hand but I just feel like the U should be stronger than they are.
Wisconsin really didn't rise up until Barry Alvarez got there in 1990. Took over a bad program and turned into a national powerhouse that you see now. And as other schools like Georgia, Alabama, Clemson, Oklahoma, Michigan, Auburn and others have proven, you don't need to be in a big city to be successful.

But it is kinda weird how Minnesota couldn't sustain the success they had in the early 1900s. Maybe to recruits stopped going there because of the weather. Maybe other programs just started getting better and making a name for themselves.
Mike Johnson
General User
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: North Canton, OH
Post Count: 1,756
mail
Mike Johnson
mail
Posted: 8/4/2016 8:26 AM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Crazy to think how good the Minnesota Golden Gophers football program was!
Building the dome and moving off campus really did not help their situation.

Minnesota was a national powerhouse in the pre-WWII era, but is well below .500 from 1942 onward. I understand that during the war years many teams were not the same, but as for why they did not return to where they were once the war was over, I have no idea.
Post-1942, didn't Minnesota have a QB named Sandy Stephenson and win - or come close to winning - a national title around 1960? I ask because I tend to recall Minn's decline starting considerably later than 1942...
Last Edited: 8/4/2016 8:27:41 AM by Mike Johnson
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,800
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 8/4/2016 8:56 AM
OUcats82 wrote:expand_more
Crazy to think how good the Minnesota Golden Gophers football program was!
Building the dome and moving off campus really did not help their situation.
It has always been a bit of a head-scratcher for me too as to why Minnesota has struggled so much in football while a school like Wisconsin seems to always have a good to great season. One does not seem to have a particular advantage over the other at first glance in terms of location, weather etc. The Twin Cities are a much larger metro area than Milwaukee etc. The program Alvarez built obviously has been sustained by and large and that alone gives the Badgers the upper hand but I just feel like the U should be stronger than they are.
You realize that Wisconsin is not located in Milwaukee? Hence your comparison of the size of the Twin Cities to Milwaukee is not relevant
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 8/4/2016 10:49 AM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Crazy to think how good the Minnesota Golden Gophers football program was!
Building the dome and moving off campus really did not help their situation.
It has always been a bit of a head-scratcher for me too as to why Minnesota has struggled so much in football while a school like Wisconsin seems to always have a good to great season. One does not seem to have a particular advantage over the other at first glance in terms of location, weather etc. The Twin Cities are a much larger metro area than Milwaukee etc. The program Alvarez built obviously has been sustained by and large and that alone gives the Badgers the upper hand but I just feel like the U should be stronger than they are.
You realize that Wisconsin is not located in Milwaukee? Hence your comparison of the size of the Twin Cities to Milwaukee is not relevant
I think the point is that these two states have nearly the same population at about 5.5 million or so. These are "the state schools" in these states with no other FBS football schools and have a statewide fan base much like Nebraska and other single major school states.
OUcats82
General User
Member Since: 1/9/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 1,912
mail
OUcats82
mail
Posted: 8/4/2016 11:08 AM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Crazy to think how good the Minnesota Golden Gophers football program was!
Building the dome and moving off campus really did not help their situation.
It has always been a bit of a head-scratcher for me too as to why Minnesota has struggled so much in football while a school like Wisconsin seems to always have a good to great season. One does not seem to have a particular advantage over the other at first glance in terms of location, weather etc. The Twin Cities are a much larger metro area than Milwaukee etc. The program Alvarez built obviously has been sustained by and large and that alone gives the Badgers the upper hand but I just feel like the U should be stronger than they are.
You realize that Wisconsin is not located in Milwaukee? Hence your comparison of the size of the Twin Cities to Milwaukee is not relevant
Sorry-I should have elaborated on my thought there. I know that UW is in Madison and have been to Camp Randall. I was implying that the available in-state talent available should arguably be higher with a larger metro area like the Twin Cities and should benefit Minnesota more than it has.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 8/4/2016 1:44 PM
Mike Johnson wrote:expand_more
Post-1942, didn't Minnesota have a QB named Sandy Stephenson and win - or come close to winning - a national title around 1960? I ask because I tend to recall Minn's decline starting considerably later than 1942...

Minnesota had a pair of 8-2 seasons in 1960 and 1961, but those were following records of 1-7 and 2-6 the two years before.
Comparing various time periods:
18xx-1941 306-91-45 .794 (among current P5 teams, only Notre Dame and Mich were higher)
1942-90 237-239-16 .498
1991-2015 130-171-0 .432
PhiTau74
General User
PT74
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Columbia, SC
Post Count: 458
person
mail
PhiTau74
mail
Posted: 8/4/2016 6:02 PM
Large city means nothing for a program, case in point is South Carolina in Columbia with a population of 750,000 and Clemson in the middle of nowhere and a National Championship and runner up last year.
That one crazy fan
General User
Member Since: 7/21/2010
Location: Iowa City, IA
Post Count: 491
mail
That one crazy fan
mail
Posted: 8/4/2016 6:04 PM
Recovering Journalist wrote:expand_more
Sooo how is Miami ranked ahead of us?
Because "all-time" does not mean "last 10 years."
Sooo how is Miami ranked ahead of us?

:P



On a side note, where did the emoji bar go?
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 8/4/2016 7:04 PM
Sadly, we lost the emoji bar, and the ability to inset pictures and fonts, and other fancy, stuff a couple years ago when Google made some changes to Chrome that broke the nifty things Ryan had made for BA. The mobile version without all the bells and whistles still worked, so that's what we use now.
That one crazy fan
General User
Member Since: 7/21/2010
Location: Iowa City, IA
Post Count: 491
mail
That one crazy fan
mail
Posted: 8/5/2016 2:19 AM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Sadly, we lost the emoji bar, and the ability to inset pictures and fonts, and other fancy, stuff a couple years ago when Google made some changes to Chrome that broke the nifty things Ryan had made for BA. The mobile version without all the bells and whistles still worked, so that's what we use now.
Daaaang, not even Firefox has that option...[expletive]ing Google...
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 8/5/2016 3:14 AM
If Firefox still works with the old fancy version, I wonder if Ryan could give those of us who use Firefox a secret link to the good version of BA with the bells and whistles, and leave the plain jane version as the main entry point?
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 8/5/2016 4:12 AM
No emojis?...YOU CAN ALWAYS YELL.
Showing Messages: 1 - 20 of 20
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)