This isn't about longevity per se.
It's about the quality of performance.
No one's going to seek to oust Saban or Urban based on longevity.
It's just that when we constantly hear gamecasters bring up our staff's longevity as proof of quality performance, well, an argument can be made that ain't so.
Once again you ignore basic statistics. Saban and Urban would be considered statistical outliers. There are NOT the norm and no where near even the upper 25 percentile range but way above. Solich and staff have close to 60% wins here in Athens and that has positive correlation with their longevity. If they were at 40 or 45 percent they'd likely not be here at this time.
I can correctly point out our very weak sched each year more often than you can make your totally-lacking-context 60% remark.
Y'know, if we don't schedule Louisville, Tennessee, Minnesota, Texas State and such, then Solich might have a 70% win rate and could be among the greatest coaches ever. Let's sched Gardner-Webb 2 or 3 times a year!
But we never see a MACC. And have seen about 1 week of top 25 in 11+ years.
I get that Saban and Urban are outliers. But that has nothing to do with the quality of Solich's work, as I point out above.
I get your emotional support for Solich...or, more accurately, your distaste for me.
But your logic constantly fails. Irrelevant points hold no water.