I rest my case on recruiting. We need MORE BETTER players to win a MACC. We have all seen WMU piling up a bunch of 3-star guys since PJ arrived at WMU. The fruits of that labor are now showing. Not sure how they are doing it...PJ Fleck only? But however they are doing it we should try getting on board with that philosophy. I guess I will say it til I die...it is just real difficult if not impossible to get a bunch of 2-star, NR guys and walk ons playing at a high enough level to win a MACC.
I have always agreed with you here, Casper. Coaching can only get you so far. You need recruiting, too. Fleck is proof enough of that. First, his recruiting at NIU from 2007-2009 was followed by NIU getting to the MAC every year from 2010-2015 (players he recruited would have played between 2010-2014), and winning it 3 of 6 tries. With his recruits gone, NIU appears to be back in the middle of the pack. Next, his recruiting at WMU has turned WMU into what thus far appears to be the best MAC team since Miami 2003.
Ohio's recruiting has improved a lot, and continues to improve, but it's been a much slower process than I ever imagined. Even now it's still not at the level that WMU and Toledo have been having in recent years. It doesn't mean that they can't win the MACC, but it will mean they will be an underdog in the Championship game, if they get there.
As a FWIW, if recruiting rankings were all that mattered, and recruiting rankings were completely accurate, and if coaching has no impact, here is what the order of teams should be, based on composite recruiting rankings from 2012-2016:
Predicted from Recruiting
Tier 1: Toledo, WMU
Tier 2: BG, NIU, Miami
Tier 3: Ohio, CMU, Ball State
Tier 4: Kent, EMU, Akron, Buffalo
Current Actual
Tier 1: WMU (same), Toledo (same)
Tier 2: CMU (+1 Tier), Ohio (+1 Tier), Akron (+2 Tiers)
Tier 3: NIU (-1 Tier), Ball St, Miami (-1 Tier)
Tier 4: Kent St, EMU, BG (-2 Tiers), Buffalo
In actual performance, that's where many teams are, which shows that the recruiting rankings are not totally wrong. Five teams aren't where the recruiting rankings predict, and in most cases I'd attribute that to coaching:
Akron - significantly better, one reason is their ranking is wrong because they
rely on so many transfers, and transfers never get counted in recruiting rankings
Ohio, CMU - somewhat better than predicted
NIU - lower, presumably due to injuries
Miami - lower than you'd expect, presumably because they suck
BG - way lower than you'd expect
Note also that if you just look at the last three years, the recruiting order shows that Ohio is moving up, just not as fast as we'd like:
Tier 1+: WMU, way, way out front
Tier 2: Toledo, NIU, Ohio, Miami
Tier 3: Ball St, Buffalo, BG
Tier 4: CMU, EMU, Kent, Akron
Last Edited: 10/4/2016 12:19:05 PM by L.C.