The best part of Miami's team is their defense. Even W. Kentucky's high powered offense didn't score much against them. Yes, they lost their first 5 games, but none of them by much. When we played them, they were not the abysmally bad team that we have all come to love.
As for Quarterbacks, they started the season with Bahl, who played until he was injured against Ohio. Wezensky played the rest of the Ohio game, and then the next game. They they turned to Ragland, who I think was their third string QB. He played some against Ohio last year, but was definitely behind Bahl a year ago.
It's my impression that all three quarterbacks are fairly close, and that the biggest difference in Miami now is that they are learning how to win. From that standpoint they may be more dangerous today than they were when Ohio played them. Nevertheless, I stand by my statement that it was a good win at the time, and that Miami was never "extremely bad", as most people portrayed them when they were 0-5.
I do find it most odd, even outrageously humorous, that Monroe would play the "Miami was worse when we played them because of injuries" card.
Last Edited: 10/30/2016 9:25:10 AM by L.C.