menu
Logo
99+
Bobcat Attack Menu
Logo
99+
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: 2016
Page: 1 of 1
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 11/5/2016 2:59 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Real football

By a team which wins conference championships


Today, late third quarter, Wisconsin, which generally operates out of the shotgun, faced a 3rd and 2 while leading Northwestern 13-7. Wisconsin moved the qb under center and went to a true two back set, resulting in a running back running for a first down.

Repeat, in case that is not clear: qb under center. two back set.


The sky didn't fall.

Experts didn't debate for hours and hours about the fabulous intricacies of being able to snap a direct handoff from centerls hands to qb's hands even though the usual offense is the shotgun.

Announcers didn't criticize the play while praising the length of time that the coaching staff has stayed together.


Real football

By a team which wins conference championships in a conference which isn't remarkably weak





Or, we can have substantial posts, 12 years in, about whether we can beat horrid teams such as Buffalo.
Y-CityCatFan
General User
YCCF
Member Since: 7/28/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 139
person
mail
Y-CityCatFan
mail
Posted: 11/5/2016 4:15 PM
settings_applications edit_note
2016...
The team is in 1st place in the division, on track to compete for a Championship, the same championship you have been relentless for! They have put together two very good games in a row and have won 7 so far this year! They are doing this by playing "REAL FOOTBALL!" Man, you are too much!
ytownbobcat
General User
Y
Member Since: 8/7/2006
Post Count: 1,253
person
mail
ytownbobcat
mail
Posted: 11/5/2016 4:50 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Agree that direct snap should be part of our offense.
I don't understand reluctance to use it especially in short yardage.
We have a 6'3" 225 qb. Direct snap definetly give us an advantage in hitting the line of scrimmage muse faster and less time for the defense to react.
Last Edited: 11/5/2016 4:53:43 PM by ytownbobcat
Cats-22
General User
C22
Member Since: 9/30/2006
Post Count: 370
person
mail
Cats-22
mail
Posted: 11/5/2016 5:56 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Before the Toledo game I was saying we should do some under-center for a QB sneak in short yardage. Here is what I imagine was a conversation between Frank and Albin after that game:

Frank: Well, good win although I'm wondering what Cats-22 thinks about how we didn't go under center in short yardage situations.
Albin: Yeah, he's probably not happy. Hey is that someone who played for us and wore #22?
Frank: I don't think so, I think it's a reference to the Joseph Heller book "Catch-22."
Albin: Oh. Well, if he wants to do puns that's his right. Who am I to judge? Anyway in the first half a fumbled QB-RB exchange and a snap over Maxwell's head killed two drives. So do you want our QBs to master new skills for the under-center game or do you want us to spend those practice reps mastering what we're already doing?
Frank: I see your reasoning. Alright let's hold off on the under-center. But one problem.
Albin: What's that?
Frank: Which one of us is going to tell Cats-22 the bad news?
Albin & Frank: (laughter)
Buckeye to Bobcat
General User
BB
Member Since: 9/10/2013
Post Count: 1,873
person
mail
Buckeye to Bobcat
mail
Posted: 11/5/2016 9:09 PM
settings_applications edit_note
That post......smh funny
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 11/6/2016 2:11 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Frank: We've been so successful, won so many MACC in my 11 years here. No need to change.
Albin: UTM
Frank: I would never consider a radical thing such as direct center snap or two-back set. Those things could lead to a turnover.
Albin: I indeed fear having the ball on offense. It could lead to a turnover.
Frank and Albin: No balls!
Frank: We'll play Gardner-Webb twice next year!
Albin: Incarnate Word!
Cats-22
General User
C22
Member Since: 9/30/2006
Post Count: 370
person
mail
Cats-22
mail
Posted: 11/6/2016 2:51 AM
settings_applications edit_note
That's actually really good Monroe. I laughed out loud at "no balls." Well done.

I am with you on the two-back sets and I think the coaches are too when we have more healthy RBs.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 11/6/2016 9:30 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Cats-22 wrote:expand_more
That's actually really good Monroe. I laughed out loud at "no balls." Well done.

I am with you on the two-back sets and I think the coaches are too when we have more healthy RBs.

I've been thinking we're going to start getting a lot of no-back sets, but now we have DL Knock, moved from WR to RB, so we should be good to continue the one-back sets awhile.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,683
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 11/6/2016 9:54 AM
settings_applications edit_note
We ran two-back sets until AJ got injured. I find it interesting that no one can fill AJ's shoes here. While not likely, it's just possible that the coaches have determined that none of the other combinations would be very effective running two-back sets. A more likely explanation is that the coaches are too incompetent to even consider a Brown-Irons two-back set.

BTW, on a related topic, I watch several games yesterday and saw examples both of teams in the shotgun that used an under-center play for short-yardage situations and teams, like OHIO, that stayed in the shotgun for short yardage plays. In one case, the announcers even commented that they wondered why the team didn't go under center. I only bring this up to point out that OHIO is not the only school that shuns the under-center option for short-yardage situations. Personally, I'd like to see it, but I don't lose sleep over it either. And, I don't think it's worth ranting about.
giacomo
General User
G
Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,761
person
mail
giacomo
mail
Posted: 11/6/2016 10:13 AM
settings_applications edit_note
At what age does someone turn into the proverbial angry old man? You know that guy. The one who finds fault in everything and can't seem to enjoy anything.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,795
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 11/6/2016 10:51 AM
settings_applications edit_note
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
We ran two-back sets until AJ got injured. I find it interesting that no one can fill AJ's shoes here. While not likely, it's just possible that the coaches have determined that none of the other combinations would be very effective running two-back sets. A more likely explanation is that the coaches are too incompetent to even consider a Brown-Irons two-back set.

BTW, on a related topic, I watch several games yesterday and saw examples both of teams in the shotgun that used an under-center play for short-yardage situations and teams, like OHIO, that stayed in the shotgun for short yardage plays. In one case, the announcers even commented that they wondered why the team didn't go under center. I only bring this up to point out that OHIO is not the only school that shuns the under-center option for short-yardage situations. Personally, I'd like to see it, but I don't lose sleep over it either. And, I don't think it's worth ranting about.
Seeing how Brown and Irons are both banged up and with availability being questionable from week to week it makes sense to not practice something that may not be possible
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,795
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 11/6/2016 10:51 AM
settings_applications edit_note
giacomo wrote:expand_more
At what age does someone turn into the proverbial angry old man? You know that guy. The one who finds fault in everything and can't seem to enjoy anything.

+1
bobcat2nc
General User
B2
Member Since: 12/28/2004
Post Count: 584
person
mail
bobcat2nc
mail
Posted: 11/6/2016 11:09 AM
settings_applications edit_note
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
At what age does someone turn into the proverbial angry old man? You know that guy. The one who finds fault in everything and can't seem to enjoy anything.

+1
I forgot the question but the answer is "depends".
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,683
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 11/6/2016 4:32 PM
settings_applications edit_note
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Seeing how Brown and Irons are both banged up and with availability being questionable from week to week it makes sense to not practice something that may not be possible
I'm assuming you caught my sarcasm.
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 11/6/2016 5:17 PM
settings_applications edit_note
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
We ran two-back sets until AJ got injured. I find it interesting that no one can fill AJ's shoes here. While not likely, it's just possible that the coaches have determined that none of the other combinations would be very effective running two-back sets. A more likely explanation is that the coaches are too incompetent to even consider a Brown-Irons two-back set.

BTW, on a related topic, I watch several games yesterday and saw examples both of teams in the shotgun that used an under-center play for short-yardage situations and teams, like OHIO, that stayed in the shotgun for short yardage plays. In one case, the announcers even commented that they wondered why the team didn't go under center. I only bring this up to point out that OHIO is not the only school that shuns the under-center option for short-yardage situations. Personally, I'd like to see it, but I don't lose sleep over it either. And, I don't think it's worth ranting about.
All three of the running backs have hire averages per carry than AJ. AJ was set to have a great year, but the backs have done fine.
Showing Messages: 1 - 15 of 15
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)