Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Why no safety?
Page: 1 of 1
mail
person
OU812812
11/22/2016 10:21 PM
A holding call was made during Akron's next to last possession and the QB was in the endzone. OU declined (which I understand) but why wasn't a safety automatically called? The rules clearly state if the player in possession of the ball is still in the endzone during the holding infraction a safety is assessed. Am I missing something or did the refs clearly blow it which is highly probable since they are in fact MAC officials?
mail
bigtillyoopsupsideurhead
11/22/2016 10:24 PM
I believe the holding call was on our NT up the middle so he was around the 1 yard line, not in the End Zone.
mail
person
allen
11/22/2016 10:24 PM
OU812812 wrote:expand_more
A holding call was made during Akron's next to last possession and the QB was in the endzone. OU declined (which I understand) but why wasn't a safety automatically called? The rules clearly state if the player in possession of the ball is still in the endzone during the holding infraction a safety is assessed. Am I missing something or did the refs clearly blow it which is highly probable since they are in fact MAC officials?
true
mail
person
OU812812
11/22/2016 10:29 PM
bigtillyoopsupsideurhead wrote:expand_more
I believe the holding call was on our NT up the middle so he was around the 1 yard line, not in the End Zone.
Maybe but right after the snap the QB looked to be in the endzone immediately. Typical MAC officials but I would also like to know why the coaches didn't raise hell over the call.
mail
Mike Coleman
11/22/2016 10:37 PM
OU812812 wrote:expand_more
I believe the holding call was on our NT up the middle so he was around the 1 yard line, not in the End Zone.
Maybe but right after the snap the QB looked to be in the endzone immediately. Typical MAC officials but I would also like to know why the coaches didn't raise hell over the call.
Where was Tom McCabe when we needed him?
mail
person
crackerbaby00
11/22/2016 11:35 PM
I am pretty sure what matters is where the foul is committed, not where the QB is.
mail
TWT
11/23/2016 12:33 AM
Mike Coleman wrote:expand_more
I believe the holding call was on our NT up the middle so he was around the 1 yard line, not in the End Zone.
Maybe but right after the snap the QB looked to be in the endzone immediately. Typical MAC officials but I would also like to know why the coaches didn't raise hell over the call.
Where was Tom McCabe when we needed him?
McCabe is the missing piece of the puzzle. We've got the punter to pin the opposing team within the 5. Need McCabe's goal line judgement for better results.
mail
person
GoCats105
11/23/2016 7:18 AM
crackerbaby00 wrote:expand_more
I am pretty sure what matters is where the foul is committed, not where the QB is.
This is what I thought too.
mail
OhioCatFan
11/23/2016 11:35 AM
I may be wrong about this, but I think the question is where is the ball when the foul occurs. If the impetus for the ball being in the end zone is on the offense (which it was) and if the ball is still in the end zone when the infraction occurs, it's a safety. I'm not sure if the last qualification was met, but I think it was. The announcers seemed to think so, too. If I'm wrong about, I'm sure BTC will set me straight.
mail
person
Deciduous Forest Cat
11/23/2016 11:52 AM
I always thought the holding itself had to be in the end zone.
mail
Bobcat110
11/23/2016 11:52 AM
I was sitting in stands behind Ohio bench and wondered too, but saw no concern from coaches, so figured it must not have been a Safety.

It looks like from the rule books that it's based on where the foul was committed, not where the ball was located. So, guess the ball can be in the endzone and a hold committed on the 1 yard line and that's not a safety.

http://www.ncaapublications.com/productdownloads/FR17.pdf

"Determining the Enforcement Spot and the Basic Spot
ARTICLE 2. a. Dead-ball fouls. The enforcement spot for a foul committed
when the ball is dead is the succeeding spot.
b. Fouls by the offensive team behind the neutral zone. For the following
fouls committed by the offensive team behind the neutral zone, the
penalty is enforced at the previous spot: illegal use of hands, holding,
illegal block and personal fouls (Exception: IF THE FOUL occurs in Team
A’s end zone the penalty is a safety.). However, see Rule 6-3-13 for
offensive team fouls during scrimmage kick plays."
Last Edited: 11/23/2016 11:53:29 AM by Bobcat110
mail
person
L.C.
11/23/2016 12:02 PM
crackerbaby00 wrote:expand_more
I am pretty sure what matters is where the foul is committed, not where the QB is.

I'm pretty sure that the location that matters is where McCabe is located.
mail
person
BillyTheCat
11/23/2016 12:38 PM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
I may be wrong about this, but I think the question is where is the ball when the foul occurs. If the impetus for the ball being in the end zone is on the offense (which it was) and if the ball is still in the end zone when the infraction occurs, it's a safety. I'm not sure if the last qualification was met, but I think it was. The announcers seemed to think so, too. If I'm wrong about, I'm sure BTC will set me straight.
Yeah, you'd be wrong about this. What matters is where did the penalty occur and what is the spot of enforcement. Holding penalties on the offense are "spot" fouls when they occur beyond the line of scrimmage, and previous spot on fouls behind the LOS. On this play, the enforcement would be the previous spot. the position of the ball has zero bearing on this enforcement.
Last Edited: 11/23/2016 12:44:28 PM by BillyTheCat
mail
person
GoCats105
11/23/2016 1:48 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
I am pretty sure what matters is where the foul is committed, not where the QB is.

I'm pretty sure that the location that matters is where McCabe is located.
Ok now that is funny.
mail
person
GoCats105
11/23/2016 1:49 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
I may be wrong about this, but I think the question is where is the ball when the foul occurs. If the impetus for the ball being in the end zone is on the offense (which it was) and if the ball is still in the end zone when the infraction occurs, it's a safety. I'm not sure if the last qualification was met, but I think it was. The announcers seemed to think so, too. If I'm wrong about, I'm sure BTC will set me straight.
Yeah, you'd be wrong about this. What matters is where did the penalty occur and what is the spot of enforcement. Holding penalties on the offense are "spot" fouls when they occur beyond the line of scrimmage, and previous spot on fouls behind the LOS. On this play, the enforcement would be the previous spot. the position of the ball has zero bearing on this enforcement.
So you're telling me that if the QB drops back 99 yards from the one to the opposite end zone, but the holding occurs at the 3 it's not a safety? THAT'S PURE POPPYCOCK! ;)
mail
person
ytownbobcat
11/23/2016 2:40 PM
It is a spot foul. From the point of the infraction.
mail
OhioCatFan
11/23/2016 3:35 PM
Thanks, BTC, I stand corrected.
mail
Pete Chouteau
11/23/2016 3:46 PM
Not unless they call intentional grounding.
mail
person
BillyTheCat
11/23/2016 6:49 PM
ytownbobcat wrote:expand_more
It is a spot foul. From the point of the infraction.
Not in the NCAA

"Fouls by Team A behind the neutral zone. For the following fouls committed by Team A behind the neutral zone, the penalty is enforced at the previous spot: illegal use of hands, holding, illegal block and personal foul (Exception: If the foul occurs in Team A’s end zone the penalty is a safety). However, see Rule 6-3-13 for kicking team fouls during scrimmage kick plays."
Showing Messages: 1 - 19 of 19
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)