Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Army QB UTM 60+ TD
Page: 1 of 1
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 12/27/2016 2:24 PM
So there was an inventive play. Hope Albin was watching.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,820
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 12/27/2016 2:26 PM
Except Army's offense, and other triple option offenses around the country, are designed for that.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,795
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 12/27/2016 8:15 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
Except Army's offense, and other triple option offenses around the country, are designed for that.
Yeah, bcat has no clue on the basic differences, from line schemes to formations.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 12/27/2016 8:33 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Except Army's offense, and other triple option offenses around the country, are designed for that.
Yeah, bcat has no clue on the basic differences, from line schemes to formations.
Basically the option version of the Ohio QB draw UTM. Ohio already has it. Guess I was too subtle with a suggestion for more UTM. Should have added a :).
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,795
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 12/27/2016 9:01 PM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
Except Army's offense, and other triple option offenses around the country, are designed for that.
Yeah, bcat has no clue on the basic differences, from line schemes to formations.
Basically the option version of the Ohio QB draw UTM. Ohio already has it. Guess I was too subtle with a suggestion for more UTM. Should have added a :).
Again, you have no clue
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 12/27/2016 9:12 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Except Army's offense, and other triple option offenses around the country, are designed for that.
Yeah, bcat has no clue on the basic differences, from line schemes to formations.
Basically the option version of the Ohio QB draw UTM. Ohio already has it. Guess I was too subtle with a suggestion for more UTM. Should have added a :).
Again, you have no clue
You are too kind.
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 12/28/2016 1:49 AM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
Except Army's offense, and other triple option offenses around the country, are designed for that.
Yeah, bcat has no clue on the basic differences, from line schemes to formations.
Basically the option version of the Ohio QB draw UTM. Ohio already has it. Guess I was too subtle with a suggestion for more UTM. Should have added a :).
Again, you have no clue
You are too kind.

The defenses we play are too good for the triple option and we will never get a top notch qb running that offense. We can run some variations of it with an athletic QB, to keep a defense guessing and confuse their defensive line. the only way to win as a non power 5 is too run the spread, no FBS defense can cover 4 good wide receivers. That is why teams like bugs use to thrash us.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 12/28/2016 2:44 AM
Please do not feed the Bcat2. It's best when he or she is ignored.

Give him or her time to absorb that we lost 3 of our last 4 this year, with the only win being a fine 9-3 performance over a terrific Akron squad.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,820
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 12/28/2016 7:16 AM
allen wrote:expand_more
Except Army's offense, and other triple option offenses around the country, are designed for that.
Yeah, bcat has no clue on the basic differences, from line schemes to formations.
Basically the option version of the Ohio QB draw UTM. Ohio already has it. Guess I was too subtle with a suggestion for more UTM. Should have added a :).
Again, you have no clue
You are too kind.

The defenses we play are too good for the triple option and we will never get a top notch qb running that offense. We can run some variations of it with an athletic QB, to keep a defense guessing and confuse their defensive line. the only way to win as a non power 5 is too run the spread, no FBS defense can cover 4 good wide receivers. That is why teams like bugs use to thrash us.
I'm gonna disagree with you on the defenses being too good. Navy has proven year after year you can consistently win with the triple option. Georgia Southern has their own version of it. Air Force is good. Georgia Tech won an Orange Bowl using it.

Would I like to see the triple option return to Athens? No. But it can work, in theory, on a consistent basis.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,683
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 12/28/2016 11:37 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Please do not feed the Bcat2. It's best when he or she is ignored.

Give him or her time to absorb that we lost 3 of our last 4 this year, with the only win being a fine 9-3 performance over a terrific Akron squad.
Me thought you were always fact-based in your analysis. You've been informed by never wrong WikiBAleaks that bcat2 is a male; yet you continue to indicate his gender is unknown. So much for fact-based rhetoric. Little journalistic errors of this sort put into question your otherwise sterling reputation as our certified pigskin analyst.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 12/28/2016 7:09 PM
I'll believe it when the Bcat2 himself or herself shows some grace and steps up and acknowledges.


Isn't it about time for the 2017 season prediction thread?
bshot44
General User
Member Since: 2/12/2012
Post Count: 2,211
mail
bshot44
mail
Posted: 12/28/2016 10:06 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
I'll believe it when the Bcat2 himself or herself shows some grace and steps up and acknowledges.


Isn't it about time for the 2017 season prediction thread?
Allow me

Hampton W
Purdue L
Kansas W
UMass W
Kent W
Akron W
BG L
Miami L
UB W
MAC West W
MAC West L
MAC West L
Boring Bowl L

7-6 (4-4)
Showing Messages: 1 - 12 of 12
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)