How about a new offense in place for 2017? The old formula isn't working for us anymore.
sounds good to me
allen. Did you not just show us an article in which our hot new QB recruit told us our offense was one of the reasons he liked Ohio? "Rourke feels the type of offence Ohio runs could also help prep him for the pros. It’s going to challenge me and it can be transferable to the NFL because it has checks and puts a lot on the quarterback," he says. "I want to challenge myself mentally so I can prepare myself mentally for the next level.”
Wes. "The old formula isn't working for us anymore." Granted the MAC only stats for the offense have Ohio in the bottom half of most. It would either be the Xs and Os or the Moes and the Joes. It was a shame Sprague could not play. I believe Sprague/Windham would have been dramatically different than Windham/Maxwell. Maxwell did OK, but, there were times he looked like a freshman, which, he still is. I would not want to ask Maxwell to learn a new offense by next fall, which, would put him back again to being a freshman in that offense. Next, as I mentioned above, allen found a good article in which, Rourke, Ohio's new QB recruit cites the offense Ohio is currently running as a reason he picked Ohio. I would not want to change now if a young QB recruit with stated ambitions to be a pro is picking Ohio and liking the offense.
Maxwell/Rourke share all the snaps through the spring. Cope, White, Ball, Odom, Harris, Meyer, perhaps Cherry get on the same page with them, Brown, Irons and Ouellette all healthy, all of the TEs back, find a left guard and a right tackle and I think the offense gets better because of the Moes and the Joes.
http://www.sportsnet.ca/football/nfl/canadian-qb-standout... /
Last Edited: 12/21/2016 5:49:02 PM by Bcat2