L.C.--Others doubtless will disagree, but I'm not sold that our quarterbacking potential is all that good.
The qb's we've had recently--I don't seek marked improvement, I don't see them having games in which we can say, in terms of passing, 'Wow, our qb really got it done, was really the main player out there today."
There was some of that with TT, of course. Can't much recall it since.
Monroe, when Gdowski and Lightner left the program, and were replaced by Johnson and Isphording, I was skeptical and concerned, but tried to give the new coaches an open mind. I was concerned about Izzy because the recruiting class under him was so bad. I was concerned about Johnson because I read about the year he coached at West Virginia. In the end it comes down to evaluating what they have done for Ohio.
It takes awhile for a new coach to make an impact, and that is particularly true when the prior coach left the cupboard bare. The offensive line under Lightner never had any depth, and when he left, there wasn't much left. Johnson was forced to play a lot of young players, like McCray, Lowerey, and Preuhs. In the last couple years the lines have made huge progress, and keep getting better. As I've watched the progress, I have every reason to believe that the offensive lines will keep getting better and better over the next couple years as the Sophomores and Freshmen who are playing become upperclassmen.
Then, since this thread is about Quarterbacks, lets look at those. Gdowski left behind Vick, Sprague, Windham, and Duckworth. I'll not knock any of them, and you can form your own opinion about whether that is a "deep talent pool" or not, but I will say that, per the data I posted above, Vick, Windham, and Sprague have all improved under Izzy.
Now, getting back to your specific comments that the quarterbacks lately haven't been good enough, who are we going to blame - the one that recruited these four, or the one that coached them as they improved? What does the future look like? Well, let's make a different sort of comparison. Let's compare each of the above quarterbacks' stats during their first year where they really played:
Vick - Sophomore - 47% completions, 1 TD, 1 Int, 101 efficiency
Sprague - Junior - 49% completions, 3 Tds, 5 Int, 100 efficiency
Windham - Junior - 48% completions, 1 TD, 4 Int, 98 efficiency
Maxwell - Freshman - 56% completions, 8 TD, 4 Int, 136 efficiency
Note that each of the above did a big jump between their first and second year, Vick from 101 to 131, Sprague from 100 to 137, and Windham from 98 to 119. How much will Maxwell jump? Can he jump to the 150 range for the rest of his career? If so, he'll own the Ohio passing records. That is, of course, if one of the two highly touted recruits for fall doesn't take the job from him.
As a final thought, many have commented on the lack of progress that quarterbacks showed up Gdowski. Here is the progress in pass efficiency that various quarterbacks showed:
AE - 108 Sophomore, 88 Junior year, 102 Senior
Bower - 120 Freshman (Illinois), 92 Junior, 126 Senior
Scott - 125 Sophomore, 112 Junior, 129 Senior
Jackson - 138 Junior, 122 in 2009, 136 Senior
Tettleton - 149 Sophomore, 141 Junior, 139 Senior
Perhaps the recruiting issue wasn't "Solich's style of offense", or "Albin's play calling". Maybe it was much simpler, the fact that quarterbacks weren't getting better under Gdowski. Perhaps the reason recruiting has suddenly improved for 2017 is the reverse, that recruits can see that the quarterbacks are in fact getting better.