What
meet
ever.
If you think that this program is in satisfactory shape and has produced acceptable results--espec no MACC--after 12 years under the current staff, then you need to examine the play and game results.
My goodness, we went 8-6 this year (worse than prior year's 8-5) despite a slew of All-MAC. Etc, etc, etc.
Some of us don't like it. We voice our opinion.
What--it's only okay for the sFB and their everything-is-perfect to opine?
8-6 this year is NOT worse than 8-5 last year. We lost games this year by 2, 5,6, 7, 7 and 9 points. Two losses were to teams ranked in top 20 at the time. And the loss to Troy was well .... Troy lost to Clemson by 6. And I suspect even you might acknowledge that Clemson is decent. And to quote your never ending drivel ... we did NOT have any "CRASHING LOSSES" this year.
You're welcome to voice your opinion. But try looking at facts and results of each game as you might realize the record alone is not what one draws a conclusion from.
My man!
I love this post, this point of view! It allows for us to possibly go 4-8 next year but, if circumstances break our way, argue that 4-8 is better than 8-6 in the same way that 8-6 is better than 8-5.
You have invented a whole new system of logic!
That there is the greatest post ever!!!!!!
And continues to match what I said about the SFB's willingness to love quality losses, to view losses as virtual wins.
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!
Gotta bring this back. It's such splendid logic as to how 8-6 was better than 8-5 and more losses can be of a finer quality such that 4-8 can be better than 8-6.
Look, I'll admit that some close losses are better than last year's triplet of about 30 point losses. But that's a function of the horrid last year, not a function of a close loss being valuable.
This tolerance for losing 12 years in will never get us to a MACC.
And it makes no sense...NONE...to have a 1) football team in 2) the MAC unless a MAC title is our far and away our primary goal.
I get it. None of us have the cash in hand to change it. That is not, however, going to keep me and other rightful thinkers from advocating for what has a chance of getting us a MACC.
By the way, welcome to 2017, another year in which the current staff will not get us a MACC.
Thank you for engendering mediocrity.