Ohio Football Topic
Topic: What happens next?
Page: 1 of 2
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 12/16/2017 8:12 AM
Toledo just signed their coach through 2013 starting at $1.1 million this coming year. Lester is at $800,000. What happens next?
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 12/16/2017 8:47 AM
Kent will jump in with $350k for their guy. Ohio will give Frank a 35 dollar raise. No surprise that even head coaches are leaving the MAC for coordinator jobs with overall salaries so low in the MAC.
Overall the MAC is a money losing proposition, just ask the students paying the fees to support sports. No wonder they are not excited about attending any more. See thread about ozone apathy.

I love college football, but the MAC model can’t keep up with where the sport is going, I’m afraid.
Buckeye to Bobcat
General User
BB
Member Since: 9/10/2013
Post Count: 1,873
person
mail
Buckeye to Bobcat
mail
Posted: 12/16/2017 9:44 AM
Simple: Toledo will regret the pay raise once they realize that the new tax laws on donations dries up similarly to the Country Club approach back in the late 80's early 90's when that no longer was deductible.

I think we're going to see our first version of a market correction in a long time with ticketing and development economics. At this point, it's going to come down to who simply want to win.
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,558
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 12/16/2017 4:14 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
Toledo just signed their coach through 2013 starting at $1.1 million this coming year. Lester is at $800,000. What happens next?
I'll tell you what happens next. Candle still signs with a p5 school within 12 months.
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 12/16/2017 5:22 PM
Frank is on a year to year contract. For those who want him fired for his 8-4 three peat need to realize that Ohio will be committing 5-6 million dollars (5 year contract) to bring the next guy in instead of the 500k per year commitment to Solich ball.
Last Edited: 12/16/2017 5:23:35 PM by Athens
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 12/16/2017 6:12 PM
Uncle Wes wrote:expand_more
Frank is on a year to year contract. For those who want him fired for his 8-4 three peat need to realize that Ohio will be committing 5-6 million dollars (5 year contract) to bring the next guy in instead of the 500k per year commitment to Solich ball.
I’m probably wrong as usual, but I think there’s no way in you-know-where Ohio University ever commits $1 million per year to a football coach. 2/3rds of the University are already up in arms about what Solich makes now. Doubling that salary? I don’t see it.
Bobcat1996
General User
B1996
Member Since: 1/3/2017
Post Count: 1,217
person
mail
Bobcat1996
mail
Posted: 12/16/2017 7:58 PM
I agree doubling any salary is crazy these days, but Ohio's AD has proven he will pay for a new coach. Examples are in mens and womens hoops and in the volleyball job for starters.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 12/16/2017 10:27 PM
cbus cat fan
General User
CCF
Member Since: 12/3/2011
Post Count: 1,169
person
mail
cbus cat fan
mail
Posted: 12/17/2017 12:28 AM
This is like the dot.com bubble of early 2000. This is not sustainable. We have had threads talking about the decline in college sports attendance, the concussion fears and yet these coaching salaries are rising astronomically. There are even sports in the Cleveland.com link that lose money for their universities. Yet, their coaches make more money than any elected official in the state?

While some businesses lose money in the short term to make lots of money in the long term, there is light at the end of the tunnel. There is no light at the end of the tunnel for most of these sports. Imagine we all made the type of money that these coaches made and our businesses were losing money without any hope of turning a profit. You know what would happen to us. This is sheer economic madness.
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,558
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 12/17/2017 12:39 PM
cbus cat fan wrote:expand_more
This is like the dot.com bubble of early 2000. This is not sustainable. We have had threads talking about the decline in college sports attendance, the concussion fears and yet these coaching salaries are rising astronomically. There are even sports in the Cleveland.com link that lose money for their universities. Yet, their coaches make more money than any elected official in the state?

While some businesses lose money in the short term to make lots of money in the long term, there is light at the end of the tunnel. There is no light at the end of the tunnel for most of these sports. Imagine we all made the type of money that these coaches made and our businesses were losing money without any hope of turning a profit. You know what would happen to us. This is sheer economic madness.
You mean like if we were the ceo of a large corporation that loses money? My guess is we get a $20 million golden parachute.
cbus cat fan
General User
CCF
Member Since: 12/3/2011
Post Count: 1,169
person
mail
cbus cat fan
mail
Posted: 12/17/2017 1:42 PM
Well if the CEO had dirt on someone, maybe. However, the end result would still be the same; the business would go belly up. These college sports coaching salaries, especially those sports that don't make money (which is essentially every sport except football and basketball) is like a game of Jenga. Eventually down the line some move is going to bring down the whole tower.
Buckeye to Bobcat
General User
BB
Member Since: 9/10/2013
Post Count: 1,873
person
mail
Buckeye to Bobcat
mail
Posted: 12/17/2017 1:51 PM
cbus cat fan wrote:expand_more
This is like the dot.com bubble of early 2000. This is not sustainable. We have had threads talking about the decline in college sports attendance, the concussion fears and yet these coaching salaries are rising astronomically. There are even sports in the Cleveland.com link that lose money for their universities. Yet, their coaches make more money than any elected official in the state?

While some businesses lose money in the short term to make lots of money in the long term, there is light at the end of the tunnel. There is no light at the end of the tunnel for most of these sports. Imagine we all made the type of money that these coaches made and our businesses were losing money without any hope of turning a profit. You know what would happen to us. This is sheer economic madness.
+1

Just wait for the new tax bill to come in, colleges I've been talking to are already sh***** bricks about where funds are going to come from since seat donations and such will no longer be deductible
cbus cat fan
General User
CCF
Member Since: 12/3/2011
Post Count: 1,169
person
mail
cbus cat fan
mail
Posted: 12/17/2017 2:45 PM
Buckeye to Bobcat, very interesting. It might well be part of the Jenga analogy I mentioned in my last post.
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 12/17/2017 2:56 PM
cbus cat fan wrote:expand_more
Buckeye to Bobcat, very interesting. It might well be part of the Jenga analogy I mentioned in my last post.
Given that, maybe Ohio’s lack of spending, or at least over-the-top spending on football seems quite prudent.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 12/17/2017 4:35 PM
Buckeye to Bobcat wrote:expand_more
This is like the dot.com bubble of early 2000. This is not sustainable. We have had threads talking about the decline in college sports attendance, the concussion fears and yet these coaching salaries are rising astronomically. There are even sports in the Cleveland.com link that lose money for their universities. Yet, their coaches make more money than any elected official in the state?

While some businesses lose money in the short term to make lots of money in the long term, there is light at the end of the tunnel. There is no light at the end of the tunnel for most of these sports. Imagine we all made the type of money that these coaches made and our businesses were losing money without any hope of turning a profit. You know what would happen to us. This is sheer economic madness.
+1

Just wait for the new tax bill to come in, colleges I've been talking to are already sh***** bricks about where funds are going to come from since seat donations and such will no longer be deductible
Huge issue. Let's say you have four platinum and four tower club seats. Required donation to buy those seats is currently $1900 with $1520 deductible. That is going to be a hard sell for many people who won't have $24,000+ to itemize.
mcbin
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 951
mail
mcbin
mail
Posted: 12/17/2017 6:10 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
This is like the dot.com bubble of early 2000. This is not sustainable. We have had threads talking about the decline in college sports attendance, the concussion fears and yet these coaching salaries are rising astronomically. There are even sports in the Cleveland.com link that lose money for their universities. Yet, their coaches make more money than any elected official in the state?

While some businesses lose money in the short term to make lots of money in the long term, there is light at the end of the tunnel. There is no light at the end of the tunnel for most of these sports. Imagine we all made the type of money that these coaches made and our businesses were losing money without any hope of turning a profit. You know what would happen to us. This is sheer economic madness.
+1

Just wait for the new tax bill to come in, colleges I've been talking to are already sh***** bricks about where funds are going to come from since seat donations and such will no longer be deductible
Huge issue. Let's say you have four platinum and four tower club seats. Required donation to buy those seats is currently $1900 with $1520 deductible. That is going to be a hard sell for many people who won't have $24,000+ to itemize.
Some schools are letting you give 2018 donations in 2017 to at least elude for one year. Haven't heard anything from Ohio, yet.

There are a number of articles like this one out there:
http://www.kentucky.com/sports/college/kentucky-sports/ar...
Buckeye to Bobcat
General User
BB
Member Since: 9/10/2013
Post Count: 1,873
person
mail
Buckeye to Bobcat
mail
Posted: 12/17/2017 7:09 PM
mcbin wrote:expand_more
This is like the dot.com bubble of early 2000. This is not sustainable. We have had threads talking about the decline in college sports attendance, the concussion fears and yet these coaching salaries are rising astronomically. There are even sports in the Cleveland.com link that lose money for their universities. Yet, their coaches make more money than any elected official in the state?

While some businesses lose money in the short term to make lots of money in the long term, there is light at the end of the tunnel. There is no light at the end of the tunnel for most of these sports. Imagine we all made the type of money that these coaches made and our businesses were losing money without any hope of turning a profit. You know what would happen to us. This is sheer economic madness.
+1

Just wait for the new tax bill to come in, colleges I've been talking to are already sh***** bricks about where funds are going to come from since seat donations and such will no longer be deductible
Huge issue. Let's say you have four platinum and four tower club seats. Required donation to buy those seats is currently $1900 with $1520 deductible. That is going to be a hard sell for many people who won't have $24,000+ to itemize.
Some schools are letting you give 2018 donations in 2017 to at least elude for one year. Haven't heard anything from Ohio, yet.

There are a number of articles like this one out there:
http://www.kentucky.com/sports/college/kentucky-sports/ar...
That's what a lot of schools are doing. Give by December 31 or else you're at the mercy of the feds. Bad news/good news for us is that it's a cost of doing business.

As for the general public, I don't know what to say. As I said it earlier, it's going to be like country clubs. With business no longer able to deduct it, those funds will dry up and in turn create opportunity for me
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 12/18/2017 9:08 AM
Buckeye to Bobcat wrote:expand_more
+1

Just wait for the new tax bill to come in, colleges I've been talking to are already sh***** bricks about where funds are going to come from since seat donations and such will no longer be deductible
Hot take alert: Good! Money spent to purchase football/basketball/other tickets (or to purchase/improve parking at such events) should never have been deductible! Donations to a university's general fund or directed into various academic, medical, or other "core mission" areas: entirely appropriate to be tax deductible. But money used to purchase football tickets (even if part of that purchase price is labeled "donation" but in actuality goes to the booster club or athletic department), I don't see any reason why that should be seen as a "charitable deduction" item.
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 12/18/2017 9:21 AM
We need to innovate. Our Offensive and defensive coordinators need to draw up schemes that best suit our talent. We have played with Ohio State and led going into the fourth quarter and then we started playing not to loose. Back then, we were tackling and covering. We had some injuries and sports writers have went to the coaches and now we can't tackle to save our lives in big games. We distribute Hall of Fame jackets to respectable players. We need innovation, once we start winning, the money will flow. When we recruit, coaches need to change up their pitch. The need to have individual development plans for each player. They need to use computer simulation to show their growth. The three stars and a few four stars will come if you sell them. Instead we go to the coaches and say Western has 15 verbals and we only have 3 and then we go and get easy wins (no belief or no relentlessness) and when we play WMU and others, they run right past us. Hit the military academies, Boise hit the JUCO's, we should recruit Ohio and continue to expand our national footprint. What we can't do is go to Florida and get a 4,6 and 4.7 40 wide receiver and think that we have done something. We have all-state Ohio WR's that run 4.6 and below that are available.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 12/18/2017 10:56 AM
mf279801 wrote:expand_more
+1

Just wait for the new tax bill to come in, colleges I've been talking to are already sh***** bricks about where funds are going to come from since seat donations and such will no longer be deductible
Hot take alert: Good! Money spent to purchase football/basketball/other tickets (or to purchase/improve parking at such events) should never have been deductible! Donations to a university's general fund or directed into various academic, medical, or other "core mission" areas: entirely appropriate to be tax deductible. But money used to purchase football tickets (even if part of that purchase price is labeled "donation" but in actuality goes to the booster club or athletic department), I don't see any reason why that should be seen as a "charitable deduction" item.
Then for the sake of discussion and to take this one step further, if athletics isn't part of the core mission of the university, then why have them and pay for them with student fees? Would you extend that to the performing arts series? Just curious.
UpSan Bobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,817
mail
UpSan Bobcat
mail
Posted: 12/18/2017 11:46 AM
The bottom part of the MAC head coach salary range is about $400,000-$450,000. Buffalo, Akron, Kent State, BG, Ball State and EMU all pay in that range.
http://sports.usatoday.com/ncaa/salaries /

Alabama has seven assistants who make at least $400,000
http://sports.usatoday.com/ncaa/salaries/football/assistant
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 12/18/2017 3:21 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
+1

Just wait for the new tax bill to come in, colleges I've been talking to are already sh***** bricks about where funds are going to come from since seat donations and such will no longer be deductible
Hot take alert: Good! Money spent to purchase football/basketball/other tickets (or to purchase/improve parking at such events) should never have been deductible! Donations to a university's general fund or directed into various academic, medical, or other "core mission" areas: entirely appropriate to be tax deductible. But money used to purchase football tickets (even if part of that purchase price is labeled "donation" but in actuality goes to the booster club or athletic department), I don't see any reason why that should be seen as a "charitable deduction" item.
Then for the sake of discussion and to take this one step further, if athletics isn't part of the core mission of the university, then why have them and pay for them with student fees? Would you extend that to the performing arts series? Just curious.
That is a good question (I have mixed feelings, doubtless biased by the fact that I do love college football and like college basketball), but not on point to what we were talking about. What I meant here (and I CERTAINLY could have worded it more precisely in my hot take...but hot takes are almost by definition vaguely worded, so its fine) was that if a person is purchasing something, the money spent on it shouldn't count as a donation.

Above, I said "Money spent to purchase football/basketball/other tickets...should never have been deductible", and that's what I mean. So let me be clear: if the "donation" is a prerequisite for purchasing the tickets/parking pass, regardless of what unit of the university is getting the money, no part of that "donation" should be tax deductible. In its current form, it exists as a figleaf/tax-dodge to allow the university to charge a higher price for the tickets while somewhat cushioning that price increase by allowing the purchaser to claim some of it as a charitable deduction. Having thought about it more, regardless of whether those dollars are going to the athletic department, the booster club, the general fund, or the history department, if those donations are being given as part of or a requirement for ticket purchase [Ticket purchase price = Face value of ticket + mandatory "donation"] then I have a tough time justifying any sort of charitable deduction for them.

And yes, the same applies to performing arts series: if the "donation" is a de facto requirement of ticket purchase it shouldn't be disguised as a donation. That's NOT to say that donations to the performing arts series, the university, or heck, even the athletic department shouldn't be tax deductible, provided that the donation is not a prerequisite for ticket purchase (i.e. the tickets are on sale to the general public for the same price regardless of whether the purchaser has also made a donation).


(Note: now on the other hand if preferential ticket access is a perk of being a donor, i.e. such that tickets are offered from highest --> smallest donor (i.e. based on all-time donations, or perhaps the length of time one has been donating, not linked to that particular purchase), before going on general sale, but all tickets sell initially for the same price, I could see a greater case being made for the tax deductibility of the donation. But again, in that scenario, the donation isn't linked to or a requirement of the purchase in the same way as it currently is in practice.)
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 12/18/2017 4:40 PM
mf279801 wrote:expand_more
+1

Just wait for the new tax bill to come in, colleges I've been talking to are already sh***** bricks about where funds are going to come from since seat donations and such will no longer be deductible
Hot take alert: Good! Money spent to purchase football/basketball/other tickets (or to purchase/improve parking at such events) should never have been deductible! Donations to a university's general fund or directed into various academic, medical, or other "core mission" areas: entirely appropriate to be tax deductible. But money used to purchase football tickets (even if part of that purchase price is labeled "donation" but in actuality goes to the booster club or athletic department), I don't see any reason why that should be seen as a "charitable deduction" item.
Then for the sake of discussion and to take this one step further, if athletics isn't part of the core mission of the university, then why have them and pay for them with student fees? Would you extend that to the performing arts series? Just curious.
That is a good question (I have mixed feelings, doubtless biased by the fact that I do love college football and like college basketball), but not on point to what we were talking about. What I meant here (and I CERTAINLY could have worded it more precisely in my hot take...but hot takes are almost by definition vaguely worded, so its fine) was that if a person is purchasing something, the money spent on it shouldn't count as a donation.

Above, I said "Money spent to purchase football/basketball/other tickets...should never have been deductible", and that's what I mean. So let me be clear: if the "donation" is a prerequisite for purchasing the tickets/parking pass, regardless of what unit of the university is getting the money, no part of that "donation" should be tax deductible. In its current form, it exists as a figleaf/tax-dodge to allow the university to charge a higher price for the tickets while somewhat cushioning that price increase by allowing the purchaser to claim some of it as a charitable deduction. Having thought about it more, regardless of whether those dollars are going to the athletic department, the booster club, the general fund, or the history department, if those donations are being given as part of or a requirement for ticket purchase [Ticket purchase price = Face value of ticket + mandatory "donation"] then I have a tough time justifying any sort of charitable deduction for them.

And yes, the same applies to performing arts series: if the "donation" is a de facto requirement of ticket purchase it shouldn't be disguised as a donation. That's NOT to say that donations to the performing arts series, the university, or heck, even the athletic department shouldn't be tax deductible, provided that the donation is not a prerequisite for ticket purchase (i.e. the tickets are on sale to the general public for the same price regardless of whether the purchaser has also made a donation).


(Note: now on the other hand if preferential ticket access is a perk of being a donor, i.e. such that tickets are offered from highest --> smallest donor (i.e. based on all-time donations, or perhaps the length of time one has been donating, not linked to that particular purchase), before going on general sale, but all tickets sell initially for the same price, I could see a greater case being made for the tax deductibility of the donation. But again, in that scenario, the donation isn't linked to or a requirement of the purchase in the same way as it currently is in practice.)
Great answer. As for the performing arts series, you don't have to give to buy tickets. Every seat in the house except row E is available to purchase to anyone unless the seat is a season ticket renewal.
Buckeye to Bobcat
General User
BB
Member Since: 9/10/2013
Post Count: 1,873
person
mail
Buckeye to Bobcat
mail
Posted: 12/18/2017 5:07 PM
mf279801 wrote:expand_more
+1

Just wait for the new tax bill to come in, colleges I've been talking to are already sh***** bricks about where funds are going to come from since seat donations and such will no longer be deductible
Hot take alert: Good! Money spent to purchase football/basketball/other tickets (or to purchase/improve parking at such events) should never have been deductible! Donations to a university's general fund or directed into various academic, medical, or other "core mission" areas: entirely appropriate to be tax deductible. But money used to purchase football tickets (even if part of that purchase price is labeled "donation" but in actuality goes to the booster club or athletic department), I don't see any reason why that should be seen as a "charitable deduction" item.
Then for the sake of discussion and to take this one step further, if athletics isn't part of the core mission of the university, then why have them and pay for them with student fees? Would you extend that to the performing arts series? Just curious.
That is a good question (I have mixed feelings, doubtless biased by the fact that I do love college football and like college basketball), but not on point to what we were talking about. What I meant here (and I CERTAINLY could have worded it more precisely in my hot take...but hot takes are almost by definition vaguely worded, so its fine) was that if a person is purchasing something, the money spent on it shouldn't count as a donation.

Above, I said "Money spent to purchase football/basketball/other tickets...should never have been deductible", and that's what I mean. So let me be clear: if the "donation" is a prerequisite for purchasing the tickets/parking pass, regardless of what unit of the university is getting the money, no part of that "donation" should be tax deductible. In its current form, it exists as a figleaf/tax-dodge to allow the university to charge a higher price for the tickets while somewhat cushioning that price increase by allowing the purchaser to claim some of it as a charitable deduction. Having thought about it more, regardless of whether those dollars are going to the athletic department, the booster club, the general fund, or the history department, if those donations are being given as part of or a requirement for ticket purchase [Ticket purchase price = Face value of ticket + mandatory "donation"] then I have a tough time justifying any sort of charitable deduction for them.

And yes, the same applies to performing arts series: if the "donation" is a de facto requirement of ticket purchase it shouldn't be disguised as a donation. That's NOT to say that donations to the performing arts series, the university, or heck, even the athletic department shouldn't be tax deductible, provided that the donation is not a prerequisite for ticket purchase (i.e. the tickets are on sale to the general public for the same price regardless of whether the purchaser has also made a donation).


(Note: now on the other hand if preferential ticket access is a perk of being a donor, i.e. such that tickets are offered from highest --> smallest donor (i.e. based on all-time donations, or perhaps the length of time one has been donating, not linked to that particular purchase), before going on general sale, but all tickets sell initially for the same price, I could see a greater case being made for the tax deductibility of the donation. But again, in that scenario, the donation isn't linked to or a requirement of the purchase in the same way as it currently is in practice.)
Oh I agree! I have reached the point where why are we funneling so much into college athletics.

I will go by a story I was given:

The Basketball Story
How is it we need a head coach, three assistant coaches, a director of operations, a video coordinator, two graduate assistants and a traveling secretary for 15 players yet the chemistry department has one prof and at most 5 GA's who oversee 200 kids? Are you really telling me that basketball requires that many people to teach people how to put a ball in the hoop?

Now think about your football staff and wonder how hard is it to teach someone to score a touchdown in football......
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 12/19/2017 9:24 AM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
Great answer. As for the performing arts series, you don't have to give to buy tickets. Every seat in the house except row E is available to purchase to anyone unless the seat is a season ticket renewal.
Thanks

Re: the performing arts series - Exactly as it should be. (I didn't mean to imply from the scenario that I set up that a donation is necessary to ticket purchase there, just laying out my thoughts on what should disqualify a donation to a performing arts series as tax deductible; namely, it being a requirement of ticket purchase)
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 28
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)