These bowl games are simply a dot in time - with no meaning - quick - who did Stanford play last year and in what bowl? Who won? No looking it up. Oh, and who cares.
I recall last year folks saying NFL teams and locker rooms would be turned off by folks like McCaffrey skipping the bowl. News flash - no one in the NFL cared. Not the team, not the players, not the fans. Not once this year have I heard any Panthers fan question his heart or commitment. We are just glad he didn't play and get hurt in a bowl game last year.
Coaches have been skipping out on bowl games (and their contracts) for decades. They made a business decision and moved on. But God forbid a player make a business decision. And you won't find a university kicking a kid out of school because he bails on a ball game. It would be a bad business decision. They know the players are the product and kicking a kid out of school over not playing in a bowl game sends a message to recruits. Plus those that skip the bowl ARE dropping out of schools this semester to train for the combine, etc. A further example on how this is about business not education (oh my!!!).
If you are disturbed at a player being allowed to stay on the sidelines after declining to play - that's fine, I understand, and agree. But the coach and administration made a business and organization decision. Consumers can respond as they wish (buying or not buying). Anyone that thinks players declining to play in bowl games is going to lead to a mass exodus by Cardinal/Buckeye/etc. fans are kidding themselves.
Last Edited: 1/2/2018 1:48:33 PM by cc-cat