Ohio Football Topic
Topic: MAC Has Had Talks With Sacramento State
Page: 3 of 3
mail
Mike Coleman
2/16/2026 9:00 PM
This might be the only time ever the MAC has come out on top of a deal.

So, guess that's the going rate. Cmon Dakota/Montana schools, we will take you too.
mail
person
GoCats105
2/16/2026 9:18 PM
Mike Coleman wrote:expand_more
This might be the only time ever the MAC has come out on top of a deal.

So, guess that's the going rate. Cmon Dakota/Montana schools, we will take you too.
FWIW Sac State is paying a heftier price tag to join the MAC ($18M) than NDSU to join the MW ($12M). That reeks more of desperation on Sac State's part than anything.
mail
person
cbarber357
2/17/2026 10:00 AM
Mike Coleman wrote:expand_more
This might be the only time ever the MAC has come out on top of a deal.

So, guess that's the going rate. Cmon Dakota/Montana schools, we will take you too.
If we want a western pod I feel like UC Davis could be in contention too. Plans to upgrade their football stadium to a capacity of 30,000.
mail
person
cc-cat
2/17/2026 10:44 AM
So basically everyone in the MAC signed a pair of home and homes with Sac St. for $1.5 million and Sac St. is covering all travel costs.
mail
person
GoCats105
2/17/2026 12:52 PM
cc-cat wrote:expand_more
So basically everyone in the MAC signed a pair of home and homes with Sac St. for $1.5 million and Sac St. is covering all travel costs.
The fun part is that $1.5 million won't even be paid in a lump sum. The $18M they're paying to get in the conference is going to be funded by their buy games against bigger schools.

https://sports.yahoo.com/college-football/article/why-wou...

"Though the university subsidizes a large percentage of Sac State’s athletic budget, Wood says most of the MAC and FBS entry fees will originate from the football program’s revenues, specifically the cash accrued from non-conference “buy games” against FBS and power league programs. Football will pay the fees for football’s move, he says."
mail
person
BillyTheCat
2/17/2026 2:07 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
So basically everyone in the MAC signed a pair of home and homes with Sac St. for $1.5 million and Sac St. is covering all travel costs.
The fun part is that $1.5 million won't even be paid in a lump sum. The $18M they're paying to get in the conference is going to be funded by their buy games against bigger schools.

https://sports.yahoo.com/college-football/article/why-wou...

"Though the university subsidizes a large percentage of Sac State’s athletic budget, Wood says most of the MAC and FBS entry fees will originate from the football program’s revenues, specifically the cash accrued from non-conference “buy games” against FBS and power league programs. Football will pay the fees for football’s move, he says."
Good, revenue you can budget on. What I have read $6M or 1/3 is due this year. And as far as them using their “Buy” games being used to pay for this over time. Kudos to them to having the foresight and a plan.
mail
Mike Coleman
2/17/2026 9:20 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
So basically everyone in the MAC signed a pair of home and homes with Sac St. for $1.5 million and Sac St. is covering all travel costs.
The fun part is that $1.5 million won't even be paid in a lump sum. The $18M they're paying to get in the conference is going to be funded by their buy games against bigger schools.

https://sports.yahoo.com/college-football/article/why-wou...

"Though the university subsidizes a large percentage of Sac State’s athletic budget, Wood says most of the MAC and FBS entry fees will originate from the football program’s revenues, specifically the cash accrued from non-conference “buy games” against FBS and power league programs. Football will pay the fees for football’s move, he says."
Good, revenue you can budget on. What I have read $6M or 1/3 is due this year. And as far as them using their “Buy” games being used to pay for this over time. Kudos to them to having the foresight and a plan.
The problem with the plan is they have ZERO of those buy games currently scheduled at a time when the P4 teams are dropping their number of their OOC games (by going to 9-game conference schedule). They don't even have one for next year, so I'm not sure where they're going to find $6 million.

https://fbschedules.com/ncaa/sacramento-state /
mail
person
BillyTheCat
2/17/2026 10:58 PM
Mike Coleman wrote:expand_more
So basically everyone in the MAC signed a pair of home and homes with Sac St. for $1.5 million and Sac St. is covering all travel costs.
The fun part is that $1.5 million won't even be paid in a lump sum. The $18M they're paying to get in the conference is going to be funded by their buy games against bigger schools.

https://sports.yahoo.com/college-football/article/why-wou...

"Though the university subsidizes a large percentage of Sac State’s athletic budget, Wood says most of the MAC and FBS entry fees will originate from the football program’s revenues, specifically the cash accrued from non-conference “buy games” against FBS and power league programs. Football will pay the fees for football’s move, he says."
Good, revenue you can budget on. What I have read $6M or 1/3 is due this year. And as far as them using their “Buy” games being used to pay for this over time. Kudos to them to having the foresight and a plan.
The problem with the plan is they have ZERO of those buy games currently scheduled at a time when the P4 teams are dropping their number of their OOC games (by going to 9-game conference schedule). They don't even have one for next year, so I'm not sure where they're going to find $6 million.

https://fbschedules.com/ncaa/sacramento-state /
They sign a contract? What’s it matter where they come up with the money? And I’m sure IU would be happy to jump on them if the chance developed. I get what you are saying, but per contractual law, how they pay isn’t really a MAC problem.
mail
Mike Coleman
2/18/2026 8:56 AM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
So basically everyone in the MAC signed a pair of home and homes with Sac St. for $1.5 million and Sac St. is covering all travel costs.
The fun part is that $1.5 million won't even be paid in a lump sum. The $18M they're paying to get in the conference is going to be funded by their buy games against bigger schools.

https://sports.yahoo.com/college-football/article/why-wou...

"Though the university subsidizes a large percentage of Sac State’s athletic budget, Wood says most of the MAC and FBS entry fees will originate from the football program’s revenues, specifically the cash accrued from non-conference “buy games” against FBS and power league programs. Football will pay the fees for football’s move, he says."
Good, revenue you can budget on. What I have read $6M or 1/3 is due this year. And as far as them using their “Buy” games being used to pay for this over time. Kudos to them to having the foresight and a plan.
The problem with the plan is they have ZERO of those buy games currently scheduled at a time when the P4 teams are dropping their number of their OOC games (by going to 9-game conference schedule). They don't even have one for next year, so I'm not sure where they're going to find $6 million.

https://fbschedules.com/ncaa/sacramento-state /
They sign a contract? What’s it matter where they come up with the money? And I’m sure IU would be happy to jump on them if the chance developed. I get what you are saying, but per contractual law, how they pay isn’t really a MAC problem.
I agree. But the media should be showing a little more skepticism, IMO.
Last Edited: 2/18/2026 8:57:06 AM by Mike Coleman
Showing Messages: 51 - 59 of 59
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)