Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Official Game 3 Thread: South Florida
Page: 1 of 4
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,945
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 11/13/2018 9:13 PM

Use this thread to talk about anything game-related. For away games, we'll have a separate travel thread.

Date: November 16th, 2018 4:30 PM

Opponent: South Florida  (2-0)

Site: Montego Bay Convention Centre

TV: CBS Sports Network

Radio: Ohio Radio or TuneIn Radio

Webcast: None

South Florida statisticsroster and media guide.

South Florida Fan Site: TheBullsPen.com   

oubobcatjohn
General User
O
Member Since: 1/1/2005
Post Count: 838
person
mail
oubobcatjohn
mail
Posted: 11/13/2018 11:21 PM
Pass the basketball...on the left hand side.
roger
General User
R
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: durham, NC
Post Count: 127
person
mail
roger
mail
Posted: 11/14/2018 6:11 AM
The Blue Ribbon analysis of both USF and Loyola Marymount pick them at the bottom of their conferences, so you would think that these are games we should win. Both teams are very big with a 7'2" center on USF and a 7'3" center on Loyola and surrounded by other bigs. It appears our outside game is going to have to be working to pull off the sweep.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 11/14/2018 9:51 AM
roger wrote:expand_more
The Blue Ribbon analysis of both USF and Loyola Marymount pick them at the bottom of their conferences, so you would think that these are games we should win. Both teams are very big with a 7'2" center on USF and a 7'3" center on Loyola and surrounded by other bigs. It appears our outside game is going to have to be working to pull off the sweep.
It appears that the 7'2" for USF doesn't play that much (10 total minutes in two games so far) although they do have a 7'0" freshman who plays more. What I'd like to know is how does a 7'2" guy shoot 36% from the field like he did last year?
Buckeye to Bobcat
General User
BB
Member Since: 9/10/2013
Post Count: 1,873
person
mail
Buckeye to Bobcat
mail
Posted: 11/14/2018 10:26 AM
$20 for the OU fan who whistles Montego Bay and gets it picked up on a TV Camera......

In all seriousness, definitely will be a good game for our boys and if we can get this one, would be a good one to get.

Ohio 74
USF 68
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 11/14/2018 10:37 AM
The Cats hit on all cylinders and win 78-61 in route to starting off the season winning the first five games. Go Cats
bshot44
General User
Member Since: 2/12/2012
Post Count: 2,211
mail
bshot44
mail
Posted: 11/14/2018 11:04 AM
roger wrote:expand_more
The Blue Ribbon analysis of both USF and Loyola Marymount pick them at the bottom of their conferences, so you would think that these are games we should win. Both teams are very big with a 7'2" center on USF and a 7'3" center on Loyola and surrounded by other bigs. It appears our outside game is going to have to be working to pull off the sweep.
Out of curiosity, where does blue ribbon project Ohio in the MAC?

I would guess middle of the pack at best ....
100%Cat
General User
Member Since: 1/17/2013
Post Count: 2,723
mail
100%Cat
mail
Posted: 11/14/2018 12:03 PM
OUVan wrote:expand_more
The Blue Ribbon analysis of both USF and Loyola Marymount pick them at the bottom of their conferences, so you would think that these are games we should win. Both teams are very big with a 7'2" center on USF and a 7'3" center on Loyola and surrounded by other bigs. It appears our outside game is going to have to be working to pull off the sweep.
It appears that the 7'2" for USF doesn't play that much (10 total minutes in two games so far) although they do have a 7'0" freshman who plays more. What I'd like to know is how does a 7'2" guy shoot 36% from the field like he did last year?
I believe the phrase is "tall and worthless."
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,795
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 11/14/2018 12:34 PM
100%Cat wrote:expand_more
The Blue Ribbon analysis of both USF and Loyola Marymount pick them at the bottom of their conferences, so you would think that these are games we should win. Both teams are very big with a 7'2" center on USF and a 7'3" center on Loyola and surrounded by other bigs. It appears our outside game is going to have to be working to pull off the sweep.
It appears that the 7'2" for USF doesn't play that much (10 total minutes in two games so far) although they do have a 7'0" freshman who plays more. What I'd like to know is how does a 7'2" guy shoot 36% from the field like he did last year?
I believe the phrase is "tall and worthless."
What is Marin Bota for $2000 Alex
shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,311
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 11/14/2018 12:56 PM
Fun fact, we were interested in USF's 7'2'' guy but Saul didn't offer.

http://www.bobcatattack.com/messageboard/topic.asp?FromPa...

This USF team is much like the one we beat in Nashville: Big, slow paced half-court game, no real stars. Keep the pace high and run the fast break whenever you can.
stub
General User
S
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 1,008
person
mail
stub
mail
Posted: 11/14/2018 1:28 PM
And passes need to be quick, strong, crisp. At least 3 were intercepted. Floaters can be ok at times but some would probably have been picked off by more talented defenders.
Last Edited: 11/14/2018 1:31:50 PM by stub
BobcatsWin
General User
BW
Member Since: 3/14/2005
Post Count: 63
person
mail
BobcatsWin
mail
Posted: 11/14/2018 3:49 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
The Blue Ribbon analysis of both USF and Loyola Marymount pick them at the bottom of their conferences, so you would think that these are games we should win. Both teams are very big with a 7'2" center on USF and a 7'3" center on Loyola and surrounded by other bigs. It appears our outside game is going to have to be working to pull off the sweep.
It appears that the 7'2" for USF doesn't play that much (10 total minutes in two games so far) although they do have a 7'0" freshman who plays more. What I'd like to know is how does a 7'2" guy shoot 36% from the field like he did last year?
I believe the phrase is "tall and worthless."
What is Marin Bota for $2000 Alex
You beat me to it! Out of curiosity I looked up his career stats. He did shoot 50% (4 of 8) from the field in 2003-04.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 11/14/2018 11:15 PM
stub wrote:expand_more
And passes need to be quick, strong, crisp. At least 3 were intercepted. Floaters can be ok at times but some would probably have been picked off by more talented defenders.
I thought the reason for the floating passes was the angles available against the 1-2-2. I thought we handled it well.
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 11/15/2018 12:47 PM
It's almost been seven years since we played these guys in the Round of 32.

Geez.
FearLeon
General User
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 5,130
mail
FearLeon
mail
Posted: 11/15/2018 6:09 PM
Brian Smith wrote:expand_more
It's almost been seven years since we played these guys in the Round of 32.

Geez.
Ohio never took advantage of the Sweet 16 year. Seven lost years since then for the program unfortunately.
Last Edited: 11/15/2018 6:10:20 PM by FearLeon
Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,641
mail
Andrew Ruck
mail
Posted: 11/15/2018 6:11 PM
FearLeon wrote:expand_more
It's almost been seven years since we played these guys in the Round of 32.

Geez.
Ohio never took advantage of the Sweet 16 year. Seven lost years since then for the program unfortunately.
Just had to say it didn't you?
Townie1977
General User
T1977
Member Since: 1/12/2015
Location: Etna, OH
Post Count: 85
person
mail
Townie1977
mail
Posted: 11/15/2018 6:57 PM
FearLeon wrote:expand_more
It's almost been seven years since we played these guys in the Round of 32.

Geez.
Ohio never took advantage of the Sweet 16 year. Seven lost years since then for the program unfortunately.
^^^ Thank you Leon. 100% correct
MonroeClassmate
General User
MC
Member Since: 8/31/2010
Post Count: 2,325
person
mail
MonroeClassmate
mail
Posted: 11/15/2018 9:33 PM
FearLeon wrote:expand_more
It's almost been seven years since we played these guys in the Round of 32.

Geez.
Ohio never took advantage of the Sweet 16 year. Seven lost years since then for the program unfortunately.
Let me see if I recall why that is, oh yes, IMO these four things for lost season number one:

Ivo went AWOL
TJ Hall's knees limited him
Kellogg went 0 for February/March and
OHIO barely squeaked by Akron in Cleveland during the Sweet 16 and what you consider lost season #1 couldn't duplicate when Akron's Harney put the breaks on DJ and other than Reggie the supporting cast wasn't there that night.
longtiimelurker
General User
L
Member Since: 2/3/2017
Post Count: 600
person
mail
longtiimelurker
mail
Posted: 11/15/2018 10:26 PM
100%Cat wrote:expand_more
how does a 7'2" guy shoot 36% from the field like he did last year?
I believe the phrase is "tall and worthless."
[/QUOTE]I thought it was "he is a project, big guys always develope late?
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,015
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 11/15/2018 10:33 PM
FearLeon wrote:expand_more
Ohio never took advantage of the Sweet 16 year. Seven lost years since then for the program unfortunately.
Yup - all because Groce f$cked us over by caring more about money than his players - at least he fell on his greedy ass in Illinois. Man - if he stays we get Lavert and then probably even someone better than him - I mean can you say elite 8....dare In say Final 4?

Or maybe we just need to stop playing and dwelling on what if
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,558
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 11/15/2018 10:51 PM
Andrew Ruck wrote:expand_more
It's almost been seven years since we played these guys in the Round of 32.

Geez.
Ohio never took advantage of the Sweet 16 year. Seven lost years since then for the program unfortunately.
Just had to say it didn't you?
How often does a mid-major get to keep a coach after a sweet 16? It just doesn't happen. Then then the next guy stays 2 and bolts. both coaches recuited blue chippers that bailed after coaching changes. You just don't reload that easily. Yet, We returned to the MAC final one year, been to the semis twice. we've twice lost our best player to injury early when we were favorites in the league. Don't feed me crap about how it doesn't matter when your best player goes down. A lot of MAC rosters can look pedestrian when their stud is out. Not saying all praise be Saul, but I don't envy his position as coach of the walking dead the last few years. Groce had to compete against Akron squads that were always good but rarely great and very beatable. and of course he gets credit for recruiting DJ who was a once in a decade player if not better. Stay healthy, learn to play together, and get hot at the right time and we can easily get there again. This myth that in a one-bid league it's somehow going to be easy to repeat post-season success is absurd.
shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,311
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 11/16/2018 12:06 AM
We are six point favorites. This is shocking to me.
FearLeon
General User
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 5,130
mail
FearLeon
mail
Posted: 11/16/2018 8:46 AM
Deciduous Forest Cat wrote:expand_more
It's almost been seven years since we played these guys in the Round of 32.

Geez.
Ohio never took advantage of the Sweet 16 year. Seven lost years since then for the program unfortunately.
Just had to say it didn't you?
This myth that in a one-bid league it's somehow going to be easy to repeat post-season success is absurd.
Ohio basketball fans should never be content going seven years without a trip to the Big Dance...ever. Nobody expects it to happen every year. But seven years is not acceptable. I believe most fans who follow the program closely believe this as well.
100%Cat
General User
Member Since: 1/17/2013
Post Count: 2,723
mail
100%Cat
mail
Posted: 11/16/2018 10:01 AM
FearLeon wrote:expand_more
It's almost been seven years since we played these guys in the Round of 32.

Geez.
Ohio never took advantage of the Sweet 16 year. Seven lost years since then for the program unfortunately.
Just had to say it didn't you?
This myth that in a one-bid league it's somehow going to be easy to repeat post-season success is absurd.
Ohio basketball fans should never be content going seven years without a trip to the Big Dance...ever. Nobody expects it to happen every year. But seven years is not acceptable. I believe most fans who follow the program closely believe this as well.
Historically speaking, since the start of the MAC tourney era, how often do we win the MAC tourney and go dancing? And have we ever had any droughts longer than the current one?
Last Edited: 11/16/2018 10:02:33 AM by 100%Cat
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
mail
OU_Country
mail
Posted: 11/16/2018 10:30 AM
100%Cat wrote:expand_more
It's almost been seven years since we played these guys in the Round of 32.

Geez.
Ohio never took advantage of the Sweet 16 year. Seven lost years since then for the program unfortunately.
Just had to say it didn't you?
This myth that in a one-bid league it's somehow going to be easy to repeat post-season success is absurd.
Ohio basketball fans should never be content going seven years without a trip to the Big Dance...ever. Nobody expects it to happen every year. But seven years is not acceptable. I believe most fans who follow the program closely believe this as well.
Historically speaking, since the start of the MAC tourney era, how often do we win the MAC tourney and go dancing? And have we ever had any droughts longer than the current one?
I cited all of those facts since the modern era of the NCAA Tournament (when 64 teams was started -- 1985) last year in another thread. All but a handful of reasonable minds didn't care about the norms or averages over the last 30+ years. They just wanted to pound their fists and demand what they wanted - as if Ohio is some mid-major super power. I'm well over arguing about that, because it's an argument that isn't going to go anywhere -- I'm not changing the minds of those who are pounding their fists. Their mind is made up for whatever their reasons.

I will offer one point though: While many want to blame Saul for everything gone wrong, what about our esteemed athletic director?

Also, it's intriguing that some people who support football's perpetual 7-5 or 8-4 seasons that fall short of Detroit are quickly willing to dump on basketball because they haven't gotten to the MAC Championship game. Food for thought.
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 86
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)