Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: AAC Requiring $10 Million Athlete Revenue Share Per School
Page: 1 of 1
mail
M.D.W.S.T
3/13/2025 2:18 PM
"Failure to reach $10 million over three years could jeopardize a school's membership."

Interesting.

$3M is no paltry sum for these guys. Of course, it's gonna be stretched across 3 years and (mostly) two sports, but I was looking through the compiled data from USAToday and they're not exactly sitting on piles of cash.

Profit from available data (March/24):
Cincy - $7M
Houston - $4.2M
Memphis - $0 (Must do math like we do, have to cover losses with fees and get to flat)
SFU - -$6M (wowsers)
ECU - $800K

As always, will be interesting to see how these schools adapt and if it rolls out to others. Gonna be a lot of capologists added to these front ofices.
https://sportsdata.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances
mail
person
BillyTheCat
3/14/2025 6:21 AM
M.D.W.S.T wrote:expand_more
"Failure to reach $10 million over three years could jeopardize a school's membership."

Interesting.

$3M is no paltry sum for these guys. Of course, it's gonna be stretched across 3 years and (mostly) two sports, but I was looking through the compiled data from USAToday and they're not exactly sitting on piles of cash.

Profit from available data (March/24):
Cincy - $7M
Houston - $4.2M
Memphis - $0 (Must do math like we do, have to cover losses with fees and get to flat)
SFU - -$6M (wowsers)
ECU - $800K

As always, will be interesting to see how these schools adapt and if it rolls out to others. Gonna be a lot of capologists added to these front ofices.
https://sportsdata.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances

What am I missing in the fact that you list Cincinnati? Aren’t they in the Big12
mail
person
GoCats105
3/14/2025 10:37 AM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
"Failure to reach $10 million over three years could jeopardize a school's membership."

Interesting.

$3M is no paltry sum for these guys. Of course, it's gonna be stretched across 3 years and (mostly) two sports, but I was looking through the compiled data from USAToday and they're not exactly sitting on piles of cash.

Profit from available data (March/24):
Cincy - $7M
Houston - $4.2M
Memphis - $0 (Must do math like we do, have to cover losses with fees and get to flat)
SFU - -$6M (wowsers)
ECU - $800K

As always, will be interesting to see how these schools adapt and if it rolls out to others. Gonna be a lot of capologists added to these front ofices.
https://sportsdata.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances

What am I missing in the fact that you list Cincinnati? Aren’t they in the Big12
So is Houston...
mail
person
Alan Swank
3/14/2025 10:47 AM
So if the MAC does this, where will we get the additional revenue or what will be cut to provide these payments?
mail
person
GoCats105
3/14/2025 10:54 AM
I think we need to come to grips with the reality that Division I at the MAC level (or Sun Belt, MWC or CUSA for that matter) may look drastically different depending on what is approved of with the House Settlement in July. There are some schools that are thinking about dropping sports altogether at lower levels, and Division I schools that are thinking about reclassifying.

https://www.extrapointsmb.com/p/here-s-why-i-m-hearing-mo...
mail
person
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
3/14/2025 1:10 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
So if the MAC does this, where will we get the additional revenue or what will be cut to provide these payments?
Other sports, superfluous athletic department employees, facilities investments, etc.

But the MAC can't afford this, and it would be silliness to pursue it.
mail
person
Alan Swank
3/14/2025 3:35 PM
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
So if the MAC does this, where will we get the additional revenue or what will be cut to provide these payments?
Other sports, superfluous athletic department employees, facilities investments, etc.

But the MAC can't afford this, and it would be silliness to pursue it.
Agreed. This take is most interesting and clearly lays out the difference between the haves and the have nothings.

https://nil-ncaa.com
mail
RSBobcat
3/14/2025 5:35 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
So if the MAC does this, where will we get the additional revenue or what will be cut to provide these payments?
Other sports, superfluous athletic department employees, facilities investments, etc.

But the MAC can't afford this, and it would be silliness to pursue it.
Agreed. This take is most interesting and clearly lays out the difference between the haves and the have nothings.

https://nil-ncaa.com
Great info link. And very depressing........
Showing Messages: 1 - 9 of 9
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)