Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: The Post: Time running out for SaulBall
Page: 3 of 4
mail
OU_Country
2/22/2019 9:58 AM
bobcat2nc wrote:expand_more
We nixed OBC and FB tickets last year. Everything this year. Regular attendance since 1998 and OBC since its inception. Not that it matters but just couldn’t justify, in my head, the small cost of ESPN + to watch Bobcat Basketball.
Just because I'm curious, and have kind of tallied the guesstimate of decreased dollars - what level of tickets did you go from to now none? Obviously you don't have to share, I was just curious. Until yesterday, the reality of the potential dollars lost for OU that we're talking about didn't really hit home for me.

Lastly - mentioned it on another thread - but ESPN+, in my book, is well worth the cost. If your household watches college hoops or soccer frequently enough, it's full of games on the weekend to choose from. I'm a college hoops junkie, and used it to watch Radford and Winthrop for a bit last night. Good game I wouldn't have otherwise seen.
mail
OU_Country
2/22/2019 10:43 AM
BayCat wrote:expand_more
After digesting the variety of posts on this topic, some thoughts from Lake Erie.

Reading the comments on this board, the passion for OU Athletics is still there and that's a good thing. Some of the comments on all of these threads have been more heated and personal in nature than usual, which again, I attribute to the nature of this topic and our desire for a great team and program. However, reading how some of you have dramatically scaled back in your purchases of late, is that passion waning? And when does it become outright apathy? If the athletic department leadership isn't watching that, then they have their heads in the sand. Once apathy sets in from long-term contributors, the program is really in trouble.

I normally make the trip from Cleveland twice a year for football and twice a year for basketball and it's easier because of a good friend who lives in Logan and is a season ticket holder. This year for basketball he told me not to bother coming down. The product on the court wasn't worth it and he wasn't going to all of the games.

If long-time devoted ticket holders are changing their attendance patterns (with no new ones to take their place), wow...

And I too have been really disappointed about Arkley's coverage.
Speaking only for myself, there are four primary things that come into play in my decision making on the scaling back. Now, I'll admit my scaling back isn't on the level taht others have mentioned here, and I don't forsee a day when I ditch tickets altogether.


Factor 1: The whole switch to GA seats in the upper level. Say what you want, but this truly pissed me off. For seven years, I sat in the same seats, next to the same people in section 229. Those people were local to Athens. We shared tickets with them when they had family in, they did the same for me. I always looked forward to coming to sit down next to them and talk about local high school hoops, and hear about the grand-kids in middle school basketball and volleyball. You go to know people at games, and it felt like a community around you. The GA situation changed that.

So NOW, in 2018-19, the Athletic Department is treating seven year season ticket holders with 6 seats (now 4) essentially the same on a game day as a Marshall fan who shows up 15 minutes before tip for one game a year. Forgive me, but that's total bullshit, and it's not the way to treat your own fanbase. It's not about the dollars, because those seats are cheap, and I know it. I'd have give 25-50% more to just keep the same assigned seats. The low cost of the seats was the reason that I started to give to the OBC, because I essentially felt guilty. In retrospect, I shouldn't have, because it's not my fault that Ohio Athletics has no idea how to create a price structure that everyone can afford across a broad range of seating areas across their whole building to have a RESERVED seat as a season ticket holder.

Factor 2: The feeling of practically being interrogated by the yellow shirts about every other, or every third game as I try to simply walk around the building during a game. And the stupid barriers all over the outside of the building. It's a bad look, and a not a good vibe as you approach a game. While I get that much of this is related to decisions made by Gung Ho Charlie at OUPD or APD -- as a fan, I don't care. It's a negative on the gameday experience, and complete overkill. For the record, I didn't get this feeling at all when I went to BG, Dayton, Butler, Duquesne, or Pitt arenas over the last three years. I'll be at UC next weekend to offer a report on that if someone wants it.

Factor 3: For basketball, it's the product on the court the last two years. I've often been the guy who used a couple hours of vaca/personal time to come down from Columbus for a weeknight game about 2-3 games a year. Forget the winning or losing, but the fact that the games haven't been as entertaining plays a big part for me on those weeknight/non Saturday or Sunday games.

Factor 4: The TV schedule changing game times. Case in point, tonight's game. As mentioned, I had a plan with my BG Buddy and wives to spend the whole today tomorrow in Athens. That got tossed out the window. Of the four of us, I'm now the only one who could get out of work early. Clearly this isn't the first time. Obviously, it doesn't leave a good taste in anyone's mouth when it happens. While I'm well aware that there's almost nothing Ohio Athletics can do about this, it plays a part in my frustrations. I'd go back to just listening to games on the radio in exchange for having a game and time on the schedule being firm once it's on the schedule.

Sorry, rant over. You asked and I thought I'd share my reasons. I'm still TBD on this idea, but I'm thinking pretty hard on looking for a mini-pack of games at Cincinnati, OSU, or Dayton. I love college hoops, and want to spend a game day having fun. Ohio got the Alma Mater bias from me for nearly 20 years. Factor number 1 above, and the fact that when I'm able to be here, the gameday itself isn't as fun, plays the part in that decision. If the whole building is GA next year, I'll probably just get two tickets. I used to get 6 and give OBC money to bring friends and other alumni down to Athens every gameday I could. If it's all GA, there's no incentive to be a season ticket holder other than saving a few bucks, so who really cares?
mail
person
Bobcat Love
2/22/2019 10:52 AM
The tax law change on OBC giving did not help the situation....just saying.
mail
OU_Country
2/22/2019 11:18 AM
Bobcat Love wrote:expand_more
The tax law change on OBC giving did not help the situation....just saying.
Excellent point. The timing was a bad thing for those using it as a tax write off on the "donation". Tax law combined with bad basketball happened at about the same time.
mail
person
ShoreCat
2/22/2019 11:22 AM
All good points, OU Country. For all of us, especially those of us who don't live close, there are so many things to take into consideration. Travel, kids, cost, time, etc., which is why it's frustrating to hear things that should reward long-time contributors are being taken away or changed.

My loyalty to the university generally leads me to go to Athens rather than spend the money on the Browns and Indians. Cost is a factor too, and that I'd rather spend a weekend in Athens with friends than downtown Cleveland (please, spare me the Cleveland jokes).

Reading these posts scares me because if you are on this board and are posting, you are the hard-core fan base. To see the frustration is a little unsettling.
mail
OhioCatFan
2/22/2019 11:42 AM
OU Country, here's a, perhaps, constructive suggestion. You are not the first person on here to express frustration with the change to all GA seating in the upper bowl. I wonder if it might have some effect in bringing back that reserve seating area in the the upper bowl if you and others on here who were impacted by this decision drew up a petition to the AD requesting bringing that section back. I know the AD is notorious for not listening, but maybe, just maybe, a petition with several signatures from long-time fans would get his attention. Might be worth a try. What da ya think?
Last Edited: 2/22/2019 11:43:23 AM by OhioCatFan
mail
person
oldkatz
2/22/2019 11:54 AM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
OU Country, here's a, perhaps, constructive suggestion. You are not the first person on here to express frustration with the change to all GA seating in the upper bowl. I wonder if it might have some effect in bringing back that reserve seating area in the the upper bowl if you and others on here who were impacted by this decision drew up a petition to the AD requesting bringing that section back. I know the AD is notorious for not listening, but maybe, just maybe, a petition with several signatures from long-time fans would get his attention. Might be worth a try. What da ya think?
"I KNOW THE AD IS NOTORIOUS FOR NOT LISTENING". That is a very telling statement.
mail
person
ShoreCat
2/22/2019 11:56 AM
and I wonder how angry we'd be if we were winning. It's amazing how willing we would be to overlook some of these issues if we were in first place in the MAC.
mail
OhioCatFan
2/22/2019 11:59 AM
BayCat wrote:expand_more
and I wonder how angry we'd be if we were winning. It's amazing how willing we would be to overlook some of these issues if we were in first place in the MAC.
Winning does cover a multitude of sins!
mail
person
Buck.Cat
2/22/2019 12:08 PM
People are harping on the lost ticket revenue but can you imagine the lost revenue experienced at a place of business like Larry's Dawg House where BobcatAttackers with deep wallets aren't making it rain?

In all seriousness, the Post has been killing it with sports journalism. Arkley has been a Frankoholic and a Saulcoholic for some time now. I am happy to see people finally paying attention to his horrid beat writing as well as his embarrassing tweets.
mail
person
Buckeye to Bobcat
2/22/2019 12:16 PM
Buck.Cat wrote:expand_more
People are harping on the lost ticket revenue but can you imagine the lost revenue experienced at a place of business like Larry's Dawg House where BobcatAttackers with deep wallets aren't making it rain?

In all seriousness, the Post has been killing it with sports journalism. Arkley has been a Frankoholic and a Saulcoholic for some time now. I am happy to see people finally paying attention to his horrid beat writing as well as his embarrassing tweets.
+1 on the economic front. Not winning as many games and keeping interest to a minimum have hurt local businesses as well. That's what happens when you're not actively out selling the programs......
mail
person
GoCats105
2/22/2019 12:35 PM
I think another thing that people don't even take into account is the lost potential revenue from future fans. If we've alienated this much of the fan base, with some of them bringing younger potential targets to games (or current student targets for that matter), then you're missing out on opportunities to attract those same kids when they're older. First impressions mean everything, and currently our basketball program and the surrounding atmosphere isn't making a great one.

I know for one thing I wouldn't be a fan of Ohio basketball if it weren't for how fun the games were when I was a student. The first game I ever went to I didn't sit in the O Zone, but the energy there made me think "oh yeah I want to be part of that." And once I got in there the games mattered more. Ohio Athletics turned me into a fan and they didn't even have to try hard. Just gave me a t-shirt and some free pizza every once in a while. The atmosphere made it fun. It hasn't been that way for a while, and I don't think it's 100% on the Saul regime. It's a combination of factors.
Last Edited: 2/22/2019 12:37:25 PM by GoCats105
mail
OU_Country
2/22/2019 3:07 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
I think another thing that people don't even take into account is the lost potential revenue from future fans. If we've alienated this much of the fan base, with some of them bringing younger potential targets to games (or current student targets for that matter), then you're missing out on opportunities to attract those same kids when they're older. First impressions mean everything, and currently our basketball program and the surrounding atmosphere isn't making a great one.

I know for one thing I wouldn't be a fan of Ohio basketball if it weren't for how fun the games were when I was a student. The first game I ever went to I didn't sit in the O Zone, but the energy there made me think "oh yeah I want to be part of that." And once I got in there the games mattered more. Ohio Athletics turned me into a fan and they didn't even have to try hard. Just gave me a t-shirt and some free pizza every once in a while. The atmosphere made it fun. It hasn't been that way for a while, and I don't think it's 100% on the Saul regime. It's a combination of factors.
Great thoughts. I can't speak for others on this, but the winning comment at the end (and as mentioned by a couple others above) is something I agree with. If this team finished the year 18-14 and 9-9 in the MAC, for example, that would change a little bit, but it doesn't change the customer experience in ticketing or the game-day experience itself. Sometimes it seems as if they think that adding a shiny new scoreboard and selling beer would mask other issues and buy them tons of goodwill.

And another thing to mention that my wife, the non-OU grad, alluded to: "Don't they have a really good sports program? You'd think they'd be better at some of this stuff." (Paraphrasing referring to the Sports Admin) She makes a fair point. We're known for this top-rated sports admin grad program, yet that top rating doesn't always seem to translate to some things within the confines of Peden or The Convo. Seems kind of strange that it wouldn't. Please note - to those who are grads of that program, I'm very much not directing this at you. It was just another observation to share from a far less invested party that myself.
mail
person
BobcatPride
2/22/2019 3:08 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
I think another thing that people don't even take into account is the lost potential revenue from future fans. If we've alienated this much of the fan base, with some of them bringing younger potential targets to games (or current student targets for that matter), then you're missing out on opportunities to attract those same kids when they're older. First impressions mean everything, and currently our basketball program and the surrounding atmosphere isn't making a great one.

I know for one thing I wouldn't be a fan of Ohio basketball if it weren't for how fun the games were when I was a student. The first game I ever went to I didn't sit in the O Zone, but the energy there made me think "oh yeah I want to be part of that." And once I got in there the games mattered more. Ohio Athletics turned me into a fan and they didn't even have to try hard. Just gave me a t-shirt and some free pizza every once in a while. The atmosphere made it fun. It hasn't been that way for a while, and I don't think it's 100% on the Saul regime. It's a combination of factors.
+1

I've only been to two games this season, but from what I've read on BA, attendance from OU students this year has been less than stellar.

I was at the Akron game, and there was a pretty good student-section turnout on sibs weekend for that game. But then the Bobcats get their doors blown and they leave with that taste in their mouths.

Football-game student attendance wasn't all that hot either.

So is there any reason to think that 5-10 years from now, this OU student base will be fired up to contribute to the OBC or come back to Athens for games? If they aren't excited now, why will they be excited later?

Sad and scary to think about.
mail
OU_Country
2/22/2019 3:08 PM
oldkatz wrote:expand_more
OU Country, here's a, perhaps, constructive suggestion. You are not the first person on here to express frustration with the change to all GA seating in the upper bowl. I wonder if it might have some effect in bringing back that reserve seating area in the the upper bowl if you and others on here who were impacted by this decision drew up a petition to the AD requesting bringing that section back. I know the AD is notorious for not listening, but maybe, just maybe, a petition with several signatures from long-time fans would get his attention. Might be worth a try. What da ya think?
"I KNOW THE AD IS NOTORIOUS FOR NOT LISTENING". That is a very telling statement.
It is a telling statement. That said, I like the idea a lot. Never hurts to draft something like that up to at least attempt to make a point.
mail
person
ohiocatfan1
2/22/2019 3:19 PM
Bobcat Love wrote:expand_more
The tax law change on OBC giving did not help the situation....just saying.
Tax law change? Not sure what you mean.
mail
person
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
2/22/2019 4:08 PM
ohiocatfan1 wrote:expand_more
The tax law change on OBC giving did not help the situation....just saying.
Tax law change? Not sure what you mean.
Because deductions went from $6,500 to $12,000 for individuals and from $13,000 to $24,000 for couples, the number of people who itemize is going to go down by more than half. That's a lot of people who are financially incentivized to take t he standard deduction and who aren't giving what they used to give to charitable organizations.

Of course, the other side of that argument is that people do have more money in their pockets and can choose to give that money wherever they want.

It's an incentive vs. freedom of choice argument.

https://www.jct.gov/publications.html?id=5091&func=startdown
Last Edited: 2/22/2019 4:19:22 PM by Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
person
GoCats105
2/22/2019 4:26 PM
OU_Country wrote:expand_more
I think another thing that people don't even take into account is the lost potential revenue from future fans. If we've alienated this much of the fan base, with some of them bringing younger potential targets to games (or current student targets for that matter), then you're missing out on opportunities to attract those same kids when they're older. First impressions mean everything, and currently our basketball program and the surrounding atmosphere isn't making a great one.

I know for one thing I wouldn't be a fan of Ohio basketball if it weren't for how fun the games were when I was a student. The first game I ever went to I didn't sit in the O Zone, but the energy there made me think "oh yeah I want to be part of that." And once I got in there the games mattered more. Ohio Athletics turned me into a fan and they didn't even have to try hard. Just gave me a t-shirt and some free pizza every once in a while. The atmosphere made it fun. It hasn't been that way for a while, and I don't think it's 100% on the Saul regime. It's a combination of factors.
Great thoughts. I can't speak for others on this, but the winning comment at the end (and as mentioned by a couple others above) is something I agree with. If this team finished the year 18-14 and 9-9 in the MAC, for example, that would change a little bit, but it doesn't change the customer experience in ticketing or the game-day experience itself. Sometimes it seems as if they think that adding a shiny new scoreboard and selling beer would mask other issues and buy them tons of goodwill.

And another thing to mention that my wife, the non-OU grad, alluded to: "Don't they have a really good sports program? You'd think they'd be better at some of this stuff." (Paraphrasing referring to the Sports Admin) She makes a fair point. We're known for this top-rated sports admin grad program, yet that top rating doesn't always seem to translate to some things within the confines of Peden or The Convo. Seems kind of strange that it wouldn't. Please note - to those who are grads of that program, I'm very much not directing this at you. It was just another observation to share from a far less invested party that myself.
I'm a graduate of the undergrad Sports Ad program, but that was back in 2006 when the issues weren't as glaring. Back then we as undergrads were encouraged and invited to volunteer within the department to gain experience. You will notice that some of the folks in the Grad Program are GAs in the athletic department. But that doesn't really mean much if your boss (the AD and others) are not affiliated with the Sports Ad program. Plus I'm not sure how much input or pull those GAs or the Sports Ad program have.
mail
person
mf279801
2/22/2019 10:29 PM
Brian Smith wrote:expand_more
The tax law change on OBC giving did not help the situation....just saying.
Tax law change? Not sure what you mean.
Because deductions went from $6,500 to $12,000 for individuals and from $13,000 to $24,000 for couples, the number of people who itemize is going to go down by more than half. That's a lot of people who are financially incentivized to take t he standard deduction and who aren't giving what they used to give to charitable organizations.

Of course, the other side of that argument is that people do have more money in their pockets and can choose to give that money wherever they want.

It's an incentive vs. freedom of choice argument.

https://www.jct.gov/publications.html?id=5091&func=startdown
Also, IIRC, the rules on charitable giving were changed to prevent/limit organizations that structured things such that you paid X-dollars for something of value (say, i don’t know, football or basketball season tickets), but you were only allowed to purchase that thing if you had also “donated” Y-dollars. What this effectively meant was that the actually price for that item (for the sake of argument, let’s call them season tickets to the Bobcats, Buckeyes, or Tide) was X+Y, but you only paid sales tax on X and you were able to deduct Y from your income (or business) taxes.

Basically this particular change in the law limited the dodge by which people bought season tickets and claimed a (significant) portion of the purchase as a charitable donation

(Full disclosure: i 100% support eliminating this type of tax shelter/faux-charitable deduction)
(Second full disclosure: I’ve only ever claimed the standard deduction, so I’m tickled pink it was greatly increased)
mail
OU_Country
2/23/2019 8:09 AM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
I think another thing that people don't even take into account is the lost potential revenue from future fans. If we've alienated this much of the fan base, with some of them bringing younger potential targets to games (or current student targets for that matter), then you're missing out on opportunities to attract those same kids when they're older. First impressions mean everything, and currently our basketball program and the surrounding atmosphere isn't making a great one.

I know for one thing I wouldn't be a fan of Ohio basketball if it weren't for how fun the games were when I was a student. The first game I ever went to I didn't sit in the O Zone, but the energy there made me think "oh yeah I want to be part of that." And once I got in there the games mattered more. Ohio Athletics turned me into a fan and they didn't even have to try hard. Just gave me a t-shirt and some free pizza every once in a while. The atmosphere made it fun. It hasn't been that way for a while, and I don't think it's 100% on the Saul regime. It's a combination of factors.
Great thoughts. I can't speak for others on this, but the winning comment at the end (and as mentioned by a couple others above) is something I agree with. If this team finished the year 18-14 and 9-9 in the MAC, for example, that would change a little bit, but it doesn't change the customer experience in ticketing or the game-day experience itself. Sometimes it seems as if they think that adding a shiny new scoreboard and selling beer would mask other issues and buy them tons of goodwill.

And another thing to mention that my wife, the non-OU grad, alluded to: "Don't they have a really good sports program? You'd think they'd be better at some of this stuff." (Paraphrasing referring to the Sports Admin) She makes a fair point. We're known for this top-rated sports admin grad program, yet that top rating doesn't always seem to translate to some things within the confines of Peden or The Convo. Seems kind of strange that it wouldn't. Please note - to those who are grads of that program, I'm very much not directing this at you. It was just another observation to share from a far less invested party that myself.
I'm a graduate of the undergrad Sports Ad program, but that was back in 2006 when the issues weren't as glaring. Back then we as undergrads were encouraged and invited to volunteer within the department to gain experience. You will notice that some of the folks in the Grad Program are GAs in the athletic department. But that doesn't really mean much if your boss (the AD and others) are not affiliated with the Sports Ad program. Plus I'm not sure how much input or pull those GAs or the Sports Ad program have.
Seems to me that both the academic program and the Athletic department should WANT to have vested interests in each other doing well and helping each other. The AD gets cheap labor of people who want to gain experience in the field, and the sports administration program gets what could be a proving ground for their future graduates. The AD gets an opportunity to get great candidates for their department who are ready to go from the start when they come in full time. Seems like opportunities missed to me.
mail
GraffZ06
2/23/2019 10:09 AM
OU_Country wrote:expand_more
Seems to me that both the academic program and the Athletic department should WANT to have vested interests in each other doing well and helping each other. The AD gets cheap labor of people who want to gain experience in the field, and the sports administration program gets what could be a proving ground for their future graduates. The AD gets an opportunity to get great candidates for their department who are ready to go from the start when they come in full time. Seems like opportunities missed to me.
You assume the AD actually wants to hear input from someone other than himself.
mail
person
BuddyLee
2/23/2019 11:40 AM
If you did a polll of the ages of people who care and post on this board, my guess is the 40+ age is the vast majority. The 18-25 market is probably almost non existent around here. So if they’re beginning to lose the support of us more die hard fans that is pretty scary for the future of the program.
mail
person
SBH
2/23/2019 1:03 PM
So true.
mail
person
Buck.Cat
2/23/2019 2:59 PM
OU_Country wrote:expand_more
Seems to me that both the academic program and the Athletic department should WANT to have vested interests in each other doing well and helping each other. The AD gets cheap labor of people who want to gain experience in the field, and the sports administration program gets what could be a proving ground for their future graduates. The AD gets an opportunity to get great candidates for their department who are ready to go from the start when they come in full time. Seems like opportunities missed to me.
I'm pretty certain that these ventures are not as cut and dry and easy to put together as people think. Otherwise, they would have already been occurring from the creation of the Sports Admin program.
mail
person
longtiimelurker
2/23/2019 3:21 PM
Reading this you would think that sports creates some sort of financial or public profile benefit that's attracting students or benefactors and alumni contributions to the university or something. It's as if some of these folks are implying that sports gives some sort of name recognition or something.
Showing Messages: 51 - 75 of 76
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)