I know I'm not necessarily following directions, but I'm indifferent as to who gets minutes and how they're divvied up. I'm more interested in seeing a group that has a legit 9-10 guys that push to be part of the rotation. I think to play any kind of intense defense, a team needs to be at least 9 deep on a regular basis. How that's broken down, for me, isn't really significant.
In a rebuilding year when a coach has been fired (non renewed) and top 2-3 players transfer or graduate and you have 9-10 guys competing for time you will be either really good or really bad. Not sure your angle here. But even Nationional Championship teams struggle to have 9-10 guys competing in real games.
I don't think he's saying that he wants to see a 9-man rotation. I think he's saying he wants to have 9-10 guys who are good enough to be part of it. In recent years we haven't had guys who could step up and contribute when parts of the rotation went down with injury.
That is correct sir. I know that as the year goes on, the rotation often gets whittled down to about 8. For now, I'm just hoping there are legitimately 9-10 guys that are really capable of being there. There weren't last year, that's for sure.
Also, assuming the statements about playing more pressure defense and high tempo are true, the need to have 9-10 on occasion may be the case with foul trouble, fatigue, injury as Van mentioned, etc.
I would also think it would be pretty tough to push the ball up and down the floor regularly with just 7 guys, but maybe I'm wrong. Since I also follow UC regularly, we have seen them have 9-10 man rotations in some years, including the last 3 years. Now, the 9th and 10th guys aren't getting more than 5-8 minutes, but they're playing in most games in that example.