The Convo is a different beast once you get 8,000 in the building.
I disagree that it is a "different beast" simply by having 8,000 in there as it would still mean about 40% of the arena has empty seats. Meaning, you're still playing in front of a nearly half-empty arena even with an exceptional crowd for a MAC school.
A good example that stands out to me about the Convo was the Virginia game. Some UVa friends of mine made the road trip from Charlottesville to Athens for the UVa-OU game. At tip-off, they kept commenting on how dead and empty the Convo was. Keep in mind, the attendance was about 7,500 that night in a game Ohio ended up actually winning. Both teams were having so-so season, which took some of the luster off having an ACC school visiting Athens, and it was a different UVa program than the one they've developed into in recent years. But what was interesting about their comments to me was, UVa's home arena at the time was University Hall, which seated about 8,500. So the 7,500 in the Convo that day would have nearly had UVa's arena filled. But I agreed with them, the Convo still had an empty-ish feel to it. That said, I have been in the filled Convo for a select few games where it did feel big time. But that's not the norm whatsoever.
Ball State falls into the same type of category as Ohio does as MAC schools with the two biggest arenas, yet, both suffer from the cavernous feel even with good crowds in them. Ball State's arena at least feels and looks a little more like an athletic venue to me compared to the Convo. The Convo looks and feels a little more like what it's actually named, a convocation center, than say Worthen Arena. I've never liked that there are three Convocations Centers in the MAC (OU, NIU and EMU) as each has the look and feel of exactly that over a basketball arena in some ways (mainly the capacity).
The two venues that suffer the worst, by far, are NIU and EMU. They have the 3rd and 4th largest venues in the MAC, respectively, and they are often horribly empty and are the two worst examples of empty arenas in the MAC. Miami's is odd because it has the feel of basketball being played in a non-arena all together. Even by not counting the empty seats behind curtains, the empty space is still obvious that it's there. I've never minded it that much, probably because of the success Ohio has had in it. I do like they way they turn off the lights above the seating and that they replaced those awful greenish, vomit colored seats.
IMO, Toledo and Buffalo have some of the best combinations of capacity/attendance/fits in the MAC. Their venues top out at capacity figures that aren't too big but also aren't too small and they usually have crowds that feed into that. To me, Toledo's capacity pretty much is spot on as the mean for a MAC arena. While I don't like UB's arena layout or look, it actually appears and feels bigger to me than what it seats, and the capacity works for UB. Obviously these are both urban schools.
When looking at the bottom half of the MAC for capacity, schools like Kent State, Akron, WMU, CMU and BG all play in the smaller arenas in the MAC. But they better fit their needs. While they aren't venues that you walk into and gasp at their size, they also aren't venues that are cavernous and empty when you put an average MAC crowd in from week to week or year to year in any of them either.
Personally, I love how college basketball arenas differ from one to another. Not just in the MAC, but nationally as well. When looking at the MAC, the 12 MAC football stadiums are more similar as a whole than the 12 MAC basketball arenas are to one another. Still, to me, each of the 12 MAC basketball arenas have their pluses and minuses. They different so much based on what exactly you are ranking them based on. Case in point, EMU has what one could argue is the nicest or best arena in the MAC, but it also features the worst atmosphere, and that's parts not even really up for debate.
Last Edited: 2/23/2020 3:32:14 PM by OhioBobcat