menu
Logo
99+
Bobcat Attack Menu
Logo
99+
Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: The State of the Program
Page: 1 of 1
71 BOBCAT
General User
71B
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 1,954
person
mail
71 BOBCAT
mail
Posted: 3/27/2021 9:15 AM
settings_applications edit_note
If all this years players return there is no telling what this team can accomplish. And let's not forget that this team could be together for 2 more years
based on NCAA rules.
We will most likely be preseason conference winners.
We will also be considered an NCAA Tournament team.
We could also be a top 10 team, like Jim Snyder's 1969-70 team was in December of 1969.
Next point to consider will be how well we can recruit with our recent success.

THE FUTURE IS BRIGHT



GO BOBCATS
Obc2
General User
O2
Member Since: 11/8/2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 597
person
mail
Obc2
mail
Posted: 3/27/2021 10:12 AM
settings_applications edit_note
This is not meant to temper tour enthusiam buti felt the exact same way in 2013.

I researched ncaa rd 1 venues before the season and made travel plans in my head.

Ahhhh, good times!
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 3/27/2021 10:17 AM
settings_applications edit_note
It would really help to schedule four or five mid-to-high level "P" teams for next season. It would really help our seeding for NCAA tourney purposes and help our chances for an at-large bid in case the MAC tourney doesn't work out. Winning a few of them would also be a boost.
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User
BLSS
Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,647
person
mail
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
Posted: 3/27/2021 10:22 AM
settings_applications edit_note
We got our asses kicked by Creighton.

Sure, we shot poorly. But aside from a 6 minute stretch in the second half, Creighton got exactly what they wanted offensively. Their ball movement had us two steps behind every action, they got tons of wide open looks and shots at the rim. They probably shot 90% at the rim, too.

We had a great season. We have good talent and a lot of promise. We're not a top 10 team. We're not Gonzaga of the midwest.

We're still a mid-major in a one bid league -- who finished third in that league, mind you. We can be very good next year, and not go to the tournament. It's a small minority, but the expectations are getting pretty crazy amongst that small minority.
Last Edited: 3/27/2021 10:33:46 AM by Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 3/27/2021 10:27 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
It would really help to schedule four or five mid-to-high level "P" teams for next season. It would really help our seeding for NCAA tourney purposes and help our chances for an at-large bid in case the MAC tourney doesn't work out. Winning a few of them would also be a boost.
I think the scheduling philosophy advanced to me over the years bears this out. "we need to schedule for all the new blood" translated to Norfolk St, NC A&T, Lamar and some of those teams that were going to be strong in a weaker league (Fuss was a master of finding those) to now....where we should be looking at filling those spots with P5 teams that are beatable to help.

This is one of those years where what I was told "once we have a senior laden team with experience we can schedule those..." applies. Walk it like you talk it and get it done.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 3/27/2021 12:27 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
We got our asses kicked by Creighton.

Sure, we shot poorly. But aside from a 6 minute stretch in the second half, Creighton got exactly what they wanted offensively. Their ball movement had us two steps behind every action, they got tons of wide open looks and shots at the rim. They probably shot 90% at the rim, too.

We had a great season. We have good talent and a lot of promise. We're not a top 10 team. We're not Gonzaga of the midwest.

We're still a mid-major in a one bid league -- who finished third in that league, mind you. We can be very good next year, and not go to the tournament. It's a small minority, but the expectations are getting pretty crazy amongst that small minority.
Agree.
TWT
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
mail
TWT
mail
Posted: 3/27/2021 12:47 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
We're still a mid-major in a one bid league -- who finished third in that league, mind you. We can be very good next year, and not go to the tournament. It's a small minority, but the expectations are getting pretty crazy amongst that small minority.
A one bid league with Ohio, Buffalo and Akron the only serious contenders. The probability of winning Cleveland is going to be up with all the returning players. Likely to at least make it to the MAC semifinals.

I don't see a reason not to be excited about higher expectations that come with more and better TV slots for next season. Didn't Toledo get an appearance on CBS as the top regular season team? Any big non-conference opponent is going to be interesting because of the real hope the bobcats can win.

Be excited but don't be disappointed if we don't make it back to the NCAAs.
bobcat 2000
General User
B2000
Member Since: 1/22/2006
Post Count: 281
person
mail
bobcat 2000
mail
Posted: 3/27/2021 6:15 PM
settings_applications edit_note
We should schedule specifically to get experience we normally wouldn't. That means plying in pre season tourneys with strong teams to get us battle tested. Add in some non conference games against teams lik duke,Kentucky,and Michigan state. Jeff could then sit with the coach and ask for help in how to utilize players and what to do differently.
bobcat 2000
General User
B2000
Member Since: 1/22/2006
Post Count: 281
person
mail
bobcat 2000
mail
Posted: 3/28/2021 12:24 AM
settings_applications edit_note
I agree,we aren't a top 10 team . We're not even a top 25 team. We do have potential but it's not fully utilized in the mac. Conference USA, American and big east are all multi bid conferences we could compete with the teams in these conferences well enough not to have to win the tourney to see the NCAA tournament.
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 3/28/2021 12:26 AM
settings_applications edit_note
bobcat 2000 wrote:expand_more
I agree,we aren't a top 10 team . We're not even a top 25 team. We do have potential but it's not fully utilized in the mac. Conference USA, American and big east are all multi bid conferences we could compete with the teams in these conferences well enough not to have to win the tourney to see the NCAA tournament.
true ....but I think giacomo will be here in a minute to remind you we can't afford to get to those places to play games.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 3/28/2021 1:04 AM
settings_applications edit_note
CUSA is NOT a multi bid league. That's been explained on here several times, but 2000 refuses to grasp it.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 3/28/2021 8:30 AM
settings_applications edit_note
bobcat 2000 wrote:expand_more
I agree,we aren't a top 10 team . We're not even a top 25 team. We do have potential but it's not fully utilized in the mac. Conference USA, American and big east are all multi bid conferences we could compete with the teams in these conferences well enough not to have to win the tourney to see the NCAA tournament.
16 Teams make the playoffs in the NBA. Let's do that!
Victory
General User
V
Member Since: 3/11/2012
Post Count: 2,519
person
mail
Victory
mail
Posted: 3/28/2021 12:15 PM
settings_applications edit_note
bobcat 2000 wrote:expand_more
I agree,we aren't a top 10 team . We're not even a top 25 team. We do have potential but it's not fully utilized in the mac. Conference USA, American and big east are all multi bid conferences we could compete with the teams in these conferences well enough not to have to win the tourney to see the NCAA tournament.
Your obsession with arguing to get the program to increase its costs and abandon longstanding rivalries and partnerships for a minor stepdown in recent average level of play in CUSA is just bizarre.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,574
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 3/28/2021 2:04 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
We got our asses kicked by Creighton.

Sure, we shot poorly. But aside from a 6 minute stretch in the second half, Creighton got exactly what they wanted offensively. Their ball movement had us two steps behind every action, they got tons of wide open looks and shots at the rim. They probably shot 90% at the rim, too.
No. This is an exaggeration. They made a lot contested shots in addition to open ones, and our defense didn't start to give until the second half when energy faded. Creighton didn't shoot a free throw for the first, what, 30 minutes? They made jump shots, but I will stand by us being the better team in the paint. We won the second half. It wasn't a tense game, but we made them perform to beat us.
Casper71
General User
C71
Member Since: 12/1/2006
Post Count: 3,237
person
mail
Casper71
mail
Posted: 3/28/2021 2:15 PM
settings_applications edit_note
JSF...we were the better team in the paint? What game were you watching? We couldn't guard them in the paint and we don't play above the rim like they did. Sorry, I really disagree with you on this one.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,574
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 3/28/2021 3:34 PM
settings_applications edit_note
We had more second chance points, we dominated on the boards, and we held them to 37% in the second half in 2-pointers to our 41%. As I said, I stand by it. Offensively, we did not have much trouble inside from their defense. We just missed shots we should not have. The game was lost on the perimeter and the turnover battle.
TWT
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
mail
TWT
mail
Posted: 3/28/2021 3:39 PM
settings_applications edit_note
bobcat 2000 wrote:expand_more
I agree,we aren't a top 10 team . We're not even a top 25 team. We do have potential but it's not fully utilized in the mac. Conference USA, American and big east are all multi bid conferences we could compete with the teams in these conferences well enough not to have to win the tourney to see the NCAA tournament.
Coattail bids have become rare. Its about who you can beat and you'll need at least 3 wins against teams in your conference that are locks for the tourney on their own resume to have a chance. Bids to the NCAAT aren't given out like candy.
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User
BLSS
Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,647
person
mail
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
Posted: 3/28/2021 7:35 PM
settings_applications edit_note
JSF wrote:expand_more
We got our asses kicked by Creighton.

Sure, we shot poorly. But aside from a 6 minute stretch in the second half, Creighton got exactly what they wanted offensively. Their ball movement had us two steps behind every action, they got tons of wide open looks and shots at the rim. They probably shot 90% at the rim, too.
No. This is an exaggeration. They made a lot contested shots in addition to open ones, and our defense didn't start to give until the second half when energy faded. Creighton didn't shoot a free throw for the first, what, 30 minutes? They made jump shots, but I will stand by us being the better team in the paint. We won the second half. It wasn't a tense game, but we made them perform to beat us.
I'd like it to be an exaggeration, and I'm proud of the way the team fought. But I'm not sure it's a huge exaggeration, unfortunately.

Despite not shooting a free throw for 30 minutes, they still averaged more FTA per FGA than we did. Their TS% was 52.5%. Ours was 37.1%. Going off the ESPN shot chart, we went 10-27 in the paint. They went 14 for 23. Their win probability never dipped below 90% in the second half.

Shooting percentage isn't everything, obviously. But Bishop alone had 4 or 5 easy buckets in the paint for them and as hard as Wilson worked, he had trouble with their length.
Showing Messages: 1 - 18 of 18
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)