Ohio wins the three-way tie with Buffalo, Kent, and Ohio -- I like this bracket -- let's hope it holds.
So even tho UB will play one less game, the four losses is what gets them into a current tie with Ohio and Kent?
Interesting.
Would be wild to see UB win Tuesday ... then UB win Friday
And Ohio sweep the week.
Toledo 16-4
Ohio 16-4
UB 15-4
Kent 15-5
So Toledo would be 3-1 vs Top 3
Ohio 1-2
UB 1-2
But Ohio the #2 because they 1-0 vs UB? [/QUOTE]I saw this explanation on the MAC Board, so take it with a grain of salt. However I believe the person who posted it runs a mac blog. (could be wrong on that though)
[quote]Due to the unbalanced schedule, the MAC will consider Buffalo tied with anyone they are either tied in the loss column with and within one in the win column or anyone they are tied within the win column, and within one loss.
For example, right now Ohio and Kent State (14-4) and Buffalo (13-4) are all tied in the eyes of the MAC. That is why in the latest bracket the league put out it went
#2 Ohio - 2-1 amongst tied teams
#3 Buffalo - 1-1 amongst tied teams
#4 Kent State - 1-2 amongst tied teams
What is interesting is these unbalanced schedule rules only apply to teams tied in one column and within one in the other column. So CMU is only going to play 18 games, which means all those 5-13 teams below them really have their work cutout because they can't get into a tie with CMU.
Hope that kind of makes sense.. Or at least my explaining makes sense even if the rule doesn't.