menu
Logo
Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: This could work.
Page: 2 of 3
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 7/19/2010 4:10 PM
OUVan wrote:expand_more
So?

I'm just saying Groce prefers Coleman over Freeman. It was pretty evident. He comes back, more of "his" recruits come in who are talented...Tommy doesn't come out draining shots, he struggles to find minutes.


Sorry but Tommy's value isn't just in his shot.  He is easily the best player on the team at passing the ball quickly.   The six games that Tommy played 20 or fewer minutes came between 12/6 and 1/20.  We went 5-8 in the stretch where Tommy's minutes were cut.  From that point on Tommy saw the court 27 minutes or more in all but one game and our scoring went from 68.3 ppg in the 13 games stretch where Tommy's role was dimished to 77.4 ppg in the final 19 games (we went 13-6 over that stretch).

I understand that Groce is going to try to find time for his recruits but the results show that he would not be wise to do it as the expense of Tommy's minutes.


The concern though is that despite the clear impact Tommy has on the offense, JG only gave Tommy increased minutes once the bench got so depleted that he had no other choice.  There were several posters commenting during that stretch of six games last year that it was highly questionable strategy to not be using Tommy more, as the offense seemed to grind to a halt without his ability to rotate the ball.  Yet, JG stuck with his guys, struggles and all, until he was forced to change the rotation due to suspensions (first Washington's, then Kinney's).

In short, although JG certainly pulled all the right strings during the MAC Tournament and NCAA Tournament runs, the entirety of last season still leaves some doubt about whether he'll settle on the best and most efficient distribution of minutes across of his roster this year, no matter how clear Tommy's importance to the offense seems to us here.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 7/19/2010 4:13 PM
There's a diff between a pretty good shooter and what TFreeman has done.

The point about Freeman moving the ball quickly should not be overlooked.  Most players on the perimeter hold the ball too long too often, giving the defense the chance to overcome the physics of ball moves faster than man.
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 7/19/2010 4:15 PM
BobcatGman wrote:expand_more
This is gonna be a super season, anything but a MAC Championship to me, is gonna be a failure.  I will be very disappointed if we're not the MAC Regular Season Champs and the MAC Tournament Champs in 2010-2011.


While I certainly hope this turns out to be the case, I think your expectations might be a little too high.  We lost two starters from a 7-9 team last year in the MAC (including the leading scorer), albeit one that happened to catch fire in March.  I agree that the sky is the limit for this team's potential, but considering that 8 of our 11 eligible scholarship players will be freshmen or sophomores, as well as the fact that our coach has yet to post even a .500 record in MAC play during his tenure here, and I think that declaring anything but a championship to be a failure is a little unfair.  
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 7/19/2010 5:16 PM
Hoops Malone wrote:expand_more
5-7 from 12/6 to 1/20


Not that it is all that big of a difference but it was 5-8

Tulsa - L
Austin Peay - L
Delaware - W
Illinois St - W
Eastern Kentucky - W
Pitt - L
Elon - W
Robert Morris - L
IUPUI - W
Kent State - L
Akron - L
Fiami - L
Bowling Green - L

Hoops Malone wrote:expand_more
Let's see. It must all have been about Tommy's lack of minutes. Not:

Armon Bassett making his first field goal on 12/6 (in his 2nd game ever with the team)
Steve Coleman not playing after 12/22
Kinney leaving the team
The team just as a whole being at a crossroads

I mean, you are making it sound like Freeman was the cure for a team battling to stay out of last place in the MAC to 2nd round NCAA tournament. It's just one of the many things to help it all eventually fall into place, but I don't think that'll give him much more than an opening day pass to get significant minutes. Even back-to-back poor performances by him I think would mean Groce throwing in more athletically gifted players to run his system. I think one of the new guards will emerge as a pretty good shooter anyways and will be better matchups defensively.


I never said it that Tommy was the cure but he definitely makes this team better. Too many people overvalue the athlete over the basketball player.  Sure there are guys that are quicker and can jump higher than Tommy but he brings a lot to the table that some very good athletes don't.  Is Tommy going to shut down the other teams best offensive threat by himself? No, but his vision and ability to take charges on help defense just might get that guy an extended stretch on the bench. Is he going to take over a game offensively by himself? No, but his quick passing and ball reversal might allow another player like Washington or Coleman to.  If one of our new recruits can do those things and do them as well as Tommy and bring some things that he doesn't then I have no problem with him receiving diminished minutes but right now he serves a very big and real need on this team.  Not everything is about being the man.  My guess is that a year or two from now people will be saying "What this team really needs is a Tommy Freeman type."
Bobcat110alum
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 470
mail
Bobcat110alum
mail
Posted: 7/19/2010 5:32 PM
How about this. 

When there's 8 seconds left in the game, and we're down by a basket, who do you want taking the last shot?  Who do you trust the most. 
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 7/19/2010 5:35 PM
Slower pace
Cooper
Freeman
Coleman
Washington
Keely/Kellogg

Faster pace
Cooper
Johnson
Coleman
Washington
Baltic

Freeman is going to play, period.  I do think he will play more or less against given teams based on match-ups, but I don't see how that is controversial or any different then last year.
Hoops Malone
General User
Member Since: 1/16/2005
Post Count: 21
mail
Hoops Malone
mail
Posted: 7/19/2010 5:37 PM
Tyler Charles wrote:expand_more
How about this. 

When there's 8 seconds left in the game, and we're down by a basket, who do you want taking the last shot?  Who do you trust the most. 


Cooper
Bobcat110alum
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 470
mail
Bobcat110alum
mail
Posted: 7/19/2010 5:50 PM
Fair enough.  What's your reasoning for Cooper?
Hoops Malone
General User
Member Since: 1/16/2005
Post Count: 21
mail
Hoops Malone
mail
Posted: 7/19/2010 6:02 PM
He can create his own shot and blow by the defender if they overplay him.

I mean, I'd tuck Freeman in the corner or have him come off a screen, but I don't think I'd ever set up a play for him as the first option.
tdcz756
General User
T756
Member Since: 1/28/2007
Location: Up North, OH
Post Count: 64
person
mail
tdcz756
mail
Posted: 7/19/2010 8:01 PM
Monroe Slavin, CPA wrote:expand_more
There's a diff between a pretty good shooter and what TFreeman has done.

The point about Freeman moving the ball quickly should not be overlooked.  Most players on the perimeter hold the ball too long too often, giving the defense the chance to overcome the physics of ball moves faster than man.


Excellent point Monroe.

Since our staff has not felt compelled to say anything I am going to steal a bit from Mr Freeman's (the senior) Facebook page and let the Cat out of the Proverbial Bag. After all, when was the last time one of our Bobcats led the nation or was Top Ten in any statistical category? I have oft wondered why the PR crew has not at least made notice of the rankings now that the furor  and damage control regarding last year's off court antics has died down somewhat.

In any case Mr Freeman (the junior) has garnered little praise  or public notice for some impressive statistical contributions.

Basketball State ranks him 2nd in True Shooting % whilst Ken Pomeroy brings him in at Numero Uno
www.bbstate.com/stats.php
kenpom.com/leaders.php
Pomeroy also lists him 3rd in Effective FG % and 24th in All Players in Offensive Rating
kenpom.com/leaders.php

In the grand scheme of things one would shake their head in bewilderment as to why anyone would discuss moving him off a starting role or diminishing minutes given the proven stats but from what I have gleaned through contacts in Athens this summer the undersized 3 is finally cracking the 200 lb mark and making absurd amounts of shots in individual and open gym situations ensuring no one is moving him off the role of starter. I would highly suspect that he and DJ Cooper are in the Mega Minutes category when the Ken Pom analysis comes out next March.  Perhaps the discussion should be regarding moving back to his more natural 2/SG spot and which new player will step up to claim the 3/SF spot. In any case it gives the staff several options with which to play. His leadership on the floor will surely benefit the youth on this team as he directs traffic and talks on both ends.

In the NCAA pure statiscal world young Mr Freeman was number 2 in straight 3 pt FG %. Most of us would think that he might get a lot more looks and touches this year than last if the offense flows as it is supposed to.  
www.ncaa.com/sports/m-baskbl/stats/ncaa-m-baskbl-div1-ind-three-point-field-goal-percentage.html

Ken Pom shows our Team as Top 100 statistically (93rd) and DJ cracking Top 100 in one category and Top 40 in 2 others. kenpom.com/team.php

Finally, my scenario for the last shot is  virtually the same as IUPUI last year. Ball in Mr. Cooper's hands and shooters in the corners, those being Kellogg the younger and Tommy Freeman with  DVW in the middle to crash boards and clean up any possible misses. But that is just based on what I have heard coming out of the Roundhouse this last 4 weeks.  Open up the floor and look for the ice water.
Last Edited: 7/19/2010 8:07:02 PM by tdcz756
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 7/19/2010 8:40 PM
Great posts Van and 756.  Espec about valuing the player and being less enamored of the pure athlete as Van said.

I think that the very high expectations which many of us have are justified and realistic.  The end of last season needs to be the starting point for this season.  KVK will be missed (!) but this team has talent.  This is OUr time.

DJ Cooper.   Don't think that I've ever seen a more relaxed player.  He's quick and he'll dagger ya.  But he's so calm about it.  He hit some big hoops last year.  He needs to be a little surer in final seconds but that's a minor complaint given his book of work last year.
Hoops Malone
General User
Member Since: 1/16/2005
Post Count: 21
mail
Hoops Malone
mail
Posted: 7/19/2010 8:43 PM
The thing is, what game did Freeman take over? He knocked down shots last year, but he also got a ton of open looks. Considering during our run of being good we had Bassett and Cooper who were both bigger threats, that usually left him wide open.

Is he a good shooter? Yes, but NCAA statistics don't really tell everything. Different levels of plays, roles on the team, etc. If he starts doing Redick-level stuff and taking over games with his shooting that'd be one thing. Right now he's just doing a good job of being a role player. Role players get minutes, but they also don't get the same luxuries to play through rough times. I'm not saying Freeman won't play a lot, because he will. All I'm saying is Groce will get his younger guys in there pretty quickly since he recruited them for his system, and they are no slouches either.
Jughead
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Location: Chillicothe, OH
Post Count: 478
mail
Jughead
mail
Posted: 7/20/2010 1:49 AM
He seemed to look good moving the ball in the Buffalo game, or at least what I could see on the tv. He drove to the bucket several times and took the open 3 just as many times.
Bobcatbasketball32
General User
B32
Member Since: 7/18/2010
Post Count: 22
person
mail
Bobcatbasketball32
mail
Posted: 7/20/2010 2:12 AM
I think we go....

PG- Cooper- MAC player of the year this year in my opinion. Improving on his 3 point shot, adding muscle and man does his court vision look outstanding.
SG- Coleman- Arguably the most purely talented player on the team. If he works hard, could be one of the most explosive scorers in the conference
SF- Freeman- Great shooter, we know that. Senior leadership. And when I saw him recently he was doing a good job of driving to the basket as well.
PF- Reggie- Most improved player I think at this point. He is doing better and better using footwork to get space in the post, and is adding a nice jumper to his game.
C- D- Dude is just plain athletic. He is our best rebounder, and most explosive player. Love him.

Bench in order:
1. Ricardo- Looked great. Moves well off the ball to get open. Good knock down shooter, and very athletic.
2. AK- Getting better and better. Probably a better defender than keely, but doesnt have the same scoring ability.
3. Nick- See my posts on the recruiting page. Love this dude
4. Ivo- Freak of an athlete as well. Will provide rebounding and can get out and run the floor on opponents with tired legs.
5. TJ- Good scoring ability off the bench. Liability on defense, but he wont see a ton of minutes so it shouldnt be awful.

Overall I cant wait for this season. MAC title needs to happen. I even think this is a team that could advance to the second round of NCAA tourney play again. I think I like this team more than lasts.
BobcatGman
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Albany, OH
Post Count: 252
mail
BobcatGman
mail
Posted: 7/20/2010 9:31 AM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
This is gonna be a super season, anything but a MAC Championship to me, is gonna be a failure.  I will be very disappointed if we're not the MAC Regular Season Champs and the MAC Tournament Champs in 2010-2011.


While I certainly hope this turns out to be the case, I think your expectations might be a little too high.  We lost two starters from a 7-9 team last year in the MAC (including the leading scorer), albeit one that happened to catch fire in March.  I agree that the sky is the limit for this team's potential, but considering that 8 of our 11 eligible scholarship players will be freshmen or sophomores, as well as the fact that our coach has yet to post even a .500 record in MAC play during his tenure here, and I think that declaring anything but a championship to be a failure is a little unfair.  


      I'll give Armon credit for carrying us through the MAC Tournament and the Georgetown game,  but  Mr. Armon 'No Passet' Bassett was poison when it came to team chemistry.  There's no reason why Steven Coleman can't cover the scoring that we lost in Bassett. Ohio will be a better TEAM without Bassett and Sure we're gonna miss KVK, But DW and Reggie which is greatly improving over this summer and throw in Alex Kellogg in the mix to cover KVK and then some,  DW, Tommy, and Steven have 2 years under Groce's system, DJ, Reggie, Ivo, and Alex  even tho he didn't play, he practiced all last year and has learned the system and they now know what Groce expects of them.  Ohio is a deeper team this year and have brought in a top notch recruiting class,  that's why I will stand by my statement for Ohio to win it all this season and yes I will be disappointed if we don't.  "DON'T  FLINCH"  Ohio fans,  cuz this is gonna be a season to remember. BOOK IT !!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Dennis  "Gman"      DON'T   FLINCH   !!!
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 7/20/2010 9:43 AM
Hoops Malone wrote:expand_more
He can create his own shot and blow by the defender if they overplay him.

I mean, I'd tuck Freeman in the corner or have him come off a screen, but I don't think I'd ever set up a play for him as the first option.


I'd agree with that.  The ball goes first to Cooper.  What I love about Cooper is he has shown that he can score the big bucket and he has shown that he will pass up a shot for a better shot by someone else if that is the better option.  I really hate the trend towards doing a clearout for the best offensive player to either hit a shot or miss it even if he gets double teamed.  In fact, I'd probably have Coleman as the second option. No team is going to leave Tommy open unless they are forced to by dribble penetration and Tommy isn't going to create his own shot consistently.  Everything starts with Cooper. 
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,825
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 7/20/2010 10:02 AM
Hoops Malone wrote:expand_more
So?

I'm just saying Groce prefers Coleman over Freeman. It was pretty evident. He comes back, more of "his" recruits come in who are talented...Tommy doesn't come out draining shots, he struggles to find minutes.


Ever thought that maybe Tommy's game performance had nothing to do with his playing or sitting? Ever thought that the kid who did the right thing got frustrated with the kid(s) doing the wrong? What if the kid doing the right spoke up?
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 7/20/2010 10:09 AM
Hoops Malone wrote:expand_more
The thing is, what game did Freeman take over?


Why does every player have to take over a game?   The things that he does helps other players take over games.  I liken Tommy to Jeff Boals even though they were very different players.  Boals wasn't the guy that made the flashy play but his quick ball reversal that led to the dump passes to Gary Trent were instrumental in our success.  Once Chad Estis graduated Boals was the only player on the team that did a good job at this. So much about college basketball is timing. A quarter of a second is all it takes for a defender to recover in time to be in good position. If the ball arrives a quarter second earlier the defender is out of position and either fouls or gives up a bucket.  When you all your perimeter guys look to score first you lose that quick passing and passing lanes are less available because by the time a scorer determines that he doesn't have a shot the defense has been able to get into position on the other players.   

In the end, there are a lot of different roles that need to be filled for teams to be successful and not all of them have to be the guy that puts the ball in the hoop.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 7/20/2010 11:46 AM
BobcatGman wrote:expand_more
Ohio is a deeper team this year and have brought in a top notch recruiting class,  that's why I will stand by my statement for Ohio to win it all this season and yes I will be disappointed if we don't.  "DON'T  FLINCH"  Ohio fans,  cuz this is gonna be a season to remember. BOOK IT !!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Dennis  "Gman"      DON'T   FLINCH   !!!


The only teams that I recall as being more of a sure thing than this year's team were the 2006 and 1995 squads.
Hoops Malone
General User
Member Since: 1/16/2005
Post Count: 21
mail
Hoops Malone
mail
Posted: 7/20/2010 12:11 PM
OUVan wrote:expand_more
Why does every player have to take over a game?   The things that he does helps other players take over games.  I liken Tommy to Jeff Boals even though they were very different players.  Boals wasn't the guy that made the flashy play but his quick ball reversal that led to the dump passes to Gary Trent were instrumental in our success.  Once Chad Estis graduated Boals was the only player on the team that did a good job at this. So much about college basketball is timing. A quarter of a second is all it takes for a defender to recover in time to be in good position. If the ball arrives a quarter second earlier the defender is out of position and either fouls or gives up a bucket.  When you all your perimeter guys look to score first you lose that quick passing and passing lanes are less available because by the time a scorer determines that he doesn't have a shot the defense has been able to get into position on the other players.   

In the end, there are a lot of different roles that need to be filled for teams to be successful and not all of them have to be the guy that puts the ball in the hoop.


My point is, he's never going to be the first option. He's rarely if ever going to be the second option. He's not a lock down defender. He's a role player. Role players can be replaced. If Cooper starts the season terrible, he'll be allowed to play on. If Freeman doesn't do much if anything through a few games, he's going to be replaced because we have people who are at his level ready to play.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 7/20/2010 3:43 PM

I think who you give the ball to in the last couple seconds is dependent largely on the situation for this team...

Maybe a go-to guy develops who is expected to take game-winners...  But as of right now, I'd rather do it by committee.

Obviously, if we can get Tommy an open look (ala Miami), I wouldn't pick anyone else if we need a 3.
If we need to get down the court, the ball is going to Cooper (setup Freeman vs. Miami, and Bassett vs. IUPUI...  Not to mention the coast to coast finish he had going into the half against Akron in the final that went right around Zeke.   )

If we are in a situation where we are inbounding with a couple seconds left and only need a 2, I might very well give the ball to Coleman...  Agree with the above thoughts that he is possibly the most purely-talented player on this team.  Both him and Cooper (using contrasting styles) are certainly capable of driving to the basket and finishing or driving and kicking.  Again, the kick is most certainly to Tommy.

...

Options aren't a bad thing.
 
...

Edit:

I'd agree that Freeman hasn't taken over a game here.

When I hear "take over," I think of Bassett's performances last year, or Bubba in a couple games in his career here (NMSU?), along with a couple of the big name NCAA 3-point shooters from the last few years (Jodie Meeks).  Freeman has had some big games through the 3 ball, but they have all come from open looks through running the system....  Don't get me wrong, that is a great thing, if every guy ran the system that well we'd be a great team...  However, I'm positive others will agree we've all seen Freeman think about a 3 only to pass off with us wishing he had gone ahead and taken it.  
At some point this year, I'd love to see Freeman jack up that ridiculous 3 when he is feeling it...  It may not be smart basketball, but when guys get that hot they can really "take over" the game...  And Tommy is a good enough 3 point shooter to get that hot...
Maybe his increased ability to create a shot will allow more of this?  Maybe it is simply not his mindset to take these kind of shots?

All this talk is getting me pumped up for next year!

Last Edited: 7/20/2010 4:01:08 PM by The Optimist
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 7/20/2010 7:12 PM
Was the 2006 squad the one after the year that we won the MAC title?  This year's team seems worlds better than that team.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,825
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 7/20/2010 10:35 PM
Monroe Slavin, CPA wrote:expand_more
Was the 2006 squad the one after the year that we won the MAC title?  This year's team seems worlds better than that team.


Yes it is the "It" squad of 05-06 and I kinda disagree. We were significantly better in the front court that season with Leon and Jerome, and the two back courts are probably even. The only thing the current team has better in my mind is coaching philosophy and defense.
Last Edited: 7/20/2010 10:37:15 PM by GoCats105
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 7/21/2010 1:10 AM
105--I have the unfair advantage of hindsight on this one.  But that 2006 team fell apart.  Maybe that taints my memory.  But I'll take this year's team any day of the week over that one.  This year's backcourt is hands down better/deeper and the team is deeper.

How did we get off the orig topic here?:  Ivo Baltic and Keely could work out sweet this year.
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 7/21/2010 11:10 AM
Monroe Slavin, CPA wrote:expand_more
105--I have the unfair advantage of hindsight on this one.  But that 2006 team fell apart.  Maybe that taints my memory.  But I'll take this year's team any day of the week over that one.  This year's backcourt is hands down better/deeper and the team is deeper.


I'm not sure I would agree.  This year's backcourt may ultimately prove to be better, but it certainly isn't clear-cut, hands down better.  I also don't think this year's backcourt is deeper than the 2005-06 backcourt (prior to the Fears transfer).  That year we started Fears-Green-Troutman and the 1-2-3, with Chatman-Davis-Halbert as the backups.  This year we've got Cooper-Coleman-Freeman, with only promising but untested freshmen Johnson and Kellogg in reserve.  Now I'd certainly agree that this year's crop has the better potential and a higher ceiling, but in terms of experience, prior production, and depth, the 2006 backcourt was better. 

The bigger advantage for this year's squad is front court depth.  Whereas this year we can go 4-5 deep (Washington, Keely, Baltic, Kellogg, and Jacobs), in 2006 we really only had Leon, a true freshman battling mono in Tillman, and then two 3s (Johnny Jackson and Halbert) that slid over to the 4. 

So overall, heading into 2005-06 we had a deeper and more experienced backcourt, but a really thin front court.  Heading into 2010-11, our backcourt has lots of potential, but is a little short on experience, while the front court is deep, albeit without a dominant low post scorer like Leon. 

If we get good coaching, and avoid defections/injury, I think that this team should be better on the whole.  However, this time 5 years ago not many people would have predicted that Fears would bolt, Tillman would get sick, Jackson would be inept at the 4, etc. 
Showing Messages: 26 - 50 of 68



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)