menu
Logo
Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Sun Belt Conference Scheduling Mandate
Page: 1 of 1
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 10/27/2010 12:31 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=5724780

Interesting article about the Sun Belt instituting scheduling and attendance requirements. Not sure what happens if teams don't meet either standard.  The Missouri Valley did something like this a few years ago as well.
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 10/27/2010 1:32 PM
Based on today's reports, they may want to focus on scheduling tutors rather than games.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 10/27/2010 1:43 PM
I wonder why they are mandating no games against non-D1 teams since they have no effect on RPI.
UpSan Bobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,817
mail
UpSan Bobcat
mail
Posted: 10/27/2010 1:58 PM
I wouldn't mind if the MAC did the same thing. I think MAC schools generally put together pretty decent non-conference basketball schedules, but there are exceptions. You're not going to get much respect playing teams with RPIs in the 200s that most people don't even know exist.
ts1227
General User
T1227
Member Since: 2/28/2006
Location: Tallmadge, OH
Post Count: 880
person
mail
ts1227
mail
Posted: 10/27/2010 3:03 PM
UpSan Bobcat wrote:expand_more
I wouldn't mind if the MAC did the same thing. I think MAC schools generally put together pretty decent non-conference basketball schedules, but there are exceptions. You're not going to get much respect playing teams with RPIs in the 200s that most people don't even know exist.


Akron would probably have to blow their entire non-conference schedule to pieces and start from scratch if such a directive were issued (at least with what they have scheduled in the recent past).
anorris
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Bristol, CT
Post Count: 2,262
mail
anorris
mail
Posted: 10/27/2010 4:55 PM
OUVan wrote:expand_more
I wonder why they are mandating no games against non-D1 teams since they have no effect on RPI.
I think their thinking was that those games eat dates that could be used against better competition.  While the lower games have no negative effect, the games they're replaced with could have a positive effect (or a negative one, if they schedule poor DI programs).
oubobcatjohn
General User
O
Member Since: 1/1/2005
Post Count: 838
person
mail
oubobcatjohn
mail
Posted: 10/28/2010 1:11 AM
MAC and Sunbelt should work together in scheduling. Both confrences are pretty even in both football and basketball. Competive games that team have a chance to win.  I'd rather play at South Alabama than have a meaningless home game vs Shippensburg or Ohio Valley.  You find out where you team is at playing a division I game.  Beating an overmatched team by 70 doesn't make your players play defense that is needed to win the grind out games that you see in the MAC.  Playing a lot of close games non-conference makes a team better they learn how to value possessions and play hard defense with the game on the line.  Unless your Bryant and you need to get that first win out of the way so that 1-28 record looks better than 0-29.   
Showing Messages: 1 - 7 of 7



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)