I am really happy they are choosing this as a point of emphasis. The game has been progressing more toward strength and less toward skill for quite some time. If you watcned Dayton in the NIT last year it was a show of pure strength winning out. Not very skilled players at any position.
Where is the reward for practicing dribbling skills if you put a 6'2 225 athletic guard on a kid like DJ Cooper and eat him up physically all night long? Where is the reward for practicing Jump Shots when you run a kid at Freeman while he is up in the air and body him up or push him into the bench?
Coaches since the late 80's have moved toward Ray Meyer's DePaul and Denny Crum's Louisville models where you recruit athletes and teach them to play basketball. The reward for being a skilled player who may not be as athletic is much too little to bridge the gap the way the game has been called in recent times. I am not even going to broach the subject of baskeball knowledge in this conversation as there is
NO reward at this point for being a smart player. Where a player knew enough to kick the ball out when he was surrounded in the lane he simply now tries to throw down on 3 guys. Not very satisfying to me as a fan. I applaud the effort to get back to basketball basics and bridge that gap that rewards smart, skilled team play over ugly basketball. Call what is there and the players and cuaches will adjust while the fans learn to relax while this thing sorts itself out and we can get closer to what what Naismith called the team sport of basketball and less of what the Freaks that call themselves the NBA leaves us with their isolations and one on one play while 4 guys stand waiting for their turn.
Last Edited: 11/18/2010 9:07:55 AM by tiptondevilcat