Just to be clear, I don't want to change the entire offense, I just want to get back to the point when it actually works well. At its peak, Groce's offense can be a thing of beauty (see the March run last year), but when it breaks down things get ugly in a hurry. The problem is that we've seen much more of the latter than the former the last 2.5 years.
Any offense works! Some of you need to understand it's the Bob's and the Joe's not the X's and O's!!! Our March run is a perfect example of this!
Even if you think that the lack of success over the last 2 and a half regular seasons under Groce is strictly a talent issue (which I think is pretty clearly false), then I fail to understand why you think it is that the blame for that does not fall on Groce at this point. Again, if you really believe that this is the best that can be done with the current group of talent, and that Kellogg, Hall, and Johnson are all only capable of being spot-up three point shooters (conveniently ignoring the fact that all three were much more than that throughout HS and AAU ball), then why did Groce just recruit three players featuring the exact same, limited skillset in the same class?
Also, just for the record, how many years are you going to trot out the same talent excuse, before admitting that it is the coach's responsibility to identify and develop sufficient talent? Because barring a spring signing miracle, we are going to be just as thin in low-post talent next year as we are this year.