menu
Logo
Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: SI.com participates in Mock NCAA Selection event
Page: 1 of 1
sargentfan
General User
S
Member Since: 3/17/2005
Post Count: 917
person
mail
sargentfan
mail
Posted: 2/21/2011 4:37 PM
The NCAA set up a mock up of how the 2-day NCAA Selection Process works with varying sports columnists participating as selection committee members.  Quite an interesting read if your interested, article

To make things easy they only took only game results from up till last Wednesday and then the NCAA did mock conference tournament results to give them the automatic qualifiers.  It was funny to see Buffalo as being the team to come out of the MAC, but even crazier was that in the pure seeding process Buffalo was seeded 67th out of the 68 teams.  Never thought I would see a MAC team predicted to play in a Dayton play-in game.  Which makes me wonder if OHIO is able to put together a good run here to end the season and win the tourney how does everyone else think they might seed us?  I would hope that last year's tourney success might give us an extra edge that Buffalo didn't have, but you never know.
bobcat28
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 817
mail
bobcat28
mail
Posted: 2/21/2011 6:37 PM
I posted this a few days ago. Unless something drastic happens, I would say the MAC is 3-5 years away from consistently being slotted as a 16 seed.
Jim Bob
General User
JB
Member Since: 2/2/2006
Post Count: 53
person
mail
Jim Bob
mail
Posted: 2/21/2011 7:31 PM
the dispatch today has miami as the 15 seed. we are definitely going the wrong direction.
Bobcat Swag
General User
Member Since: 1/9/2011
Post Count: 153
mail
Bobcat Swag
mail
Posted: 2/21/2011 8:15 PM
ESPN Bracketology has them as a 16th seed. Not good.
Shawn Sellers
General User
SS
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 228
person
mail
Shawn Sellers
mail
Posted: 2/21/2011 8:38 PM
Adding 4 teams pushed the MAC down 1 seed in most years, which would have placed the bobcats at 15 last year coming out of the 9 seed from the MAC tournament. I'll be surprised if we would have a 16 seed as long as the bottom of the west doesn't win the conference tournament.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 2/21/2011 9:57 PM
I think it's going to be tough for a MAC team to get above a 15 seed, barring a slew of upsets in other conferences' tourneys.  The break for 16 seeds will probably be around 100 RPI, and only Fiami and Kent (both around 100) have a real shot at getting much below that.  The Cats probably can maybe get a 15 by winning out in the regular season and beating both Fiami and Kent in the tourney. 
UpSan Bobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,817
mail
UpSan Bobcat
mail
Posted: 2/22/2011 7:43 AM
That's the key with predicting the bottom seeds now. Right now, the best team from each conference is being put in the bracket. But once the tournaments play out, typically there are several tournaments were a team in the bottom 100s or even 200s wins and replaces a team that made have been 100 or higher. I can't imagine a MAC team getting less than a 15, but if things broke just right, it could happen.
sargentfan
General User
S
Member Since: 3/17/2005
Post Count: 917
person
mail
sargentfan
mail
Posted: 2/22/2011 12:55 PM
It is just crazy to think that this conference used to be on the cusp of being a top 10 conference in the nation and now we are rated as only the 18th best.  Even ESPN is noticing now with Pat Forde's column today dedicating an entire section to the fall of the MAC.
bobcatsquared
General User
B
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 5,850
person
mail
bobcatsquared
mail
Posted: 2/22/2011 1:06 PM
       I have been as critical of this league as anyone on here this winter. And I usually shrug off Joe Mac' assertion that these conference rankings are cyclical (although I'm not sure Joe has brought this up recently). But I truly believe that there is a light at the end of the tunnel and that a look at most MAC teams' rosters will show that the future does look brighter. I can only think of Akron as a team that might take a step backward next year due to graduation losses.
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,950
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 2/22/2011 1:48 PM
bobcatsquared wrote:expand_more
       I have been as critical of this league as anyone on here this winter. And I usually shrug off Joe Mac' assertion that these conference rankings are cyclical (although I'm not sure Joe has brought this up recently). But I truly believe that there is a light at the end of the tunnel and that a look at most MAC teams' rosters will show that the future does look brighter. I can only think of Akron as a team that might take a step backward next year due to graduation losses.


Also, the coaches at CMU, EMU and NIU need to be replaced. I think CMU just gave Ziegler an extension to coach more bad basketball. EMU doesn't care, how else does Ramsey get to a 6th year? I am confident that NIU will pull the plug on Patton. Kowalczyk will turn Toledo around. Hawkins and Witherspoon are middling coaches who can usually keep their teams around Top 150. Ford, Dambrot and Coles typically field Top 100 teams. And my hope is that Taylor and Groce are trending up. Orr hasn't put much effort into recruiting but maybe the new arena will revive BG hoops.
Showing Messages: 1 - 10 of 10



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)