Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Proposed 90 team NCAA Tourney
Page: 1 of 1
FJC31
General User
FJC31
Member Since: 3/31/2022
Post Count: 2,279
person
mail
FJC31
mail
Posted: 1/3/2023 4:41 PM
Our very own Julie Cromer co-leading the charge.

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/35372595/n...
longtiimelurker
General User
L
Member Since: 2/3/2017
Post Count: 600
person
mail
longtiimelurker
mail
Posted: 1/3/2023 9:50 PM
FJC31 wrote:expand_more
Our very own Julie Cromer co-leading the charge.

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/35372595/n...
Great

"-- the committee's report made clear the solution is beyond the NCAA's reach: "Congress is the only entity that can grant that stability.''

More things for government to argue about.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,677
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 1/3/2023 11:38 PM
longtiimelurker wrote:expand_more
Our very own Julie Cromer co-leading the charge.

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/35372595/n...
Great

"-- the committee's report made clear the solution is beyond the NCAA's reach: "Congress is the only entity that can grant that stability.''

More things for government to argue about.
Just to be clear this government involvement was not related to the 90-team tournament recommendation but to issues related to NIL. The full quote: "As for rules related to athletes cashing in with celebrity endorsement deals -- a profound change over the past 18 months in college sports -- the committee's report made clear the solution is beyond the NCAA's reach: 'Congress is the only entity that can grant that stability.'''
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,793
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 1/4/2023 10:07 AM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
Our very own Julie Cromer co-leading the charge.

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/35372595/n...
Great

"-- the committee's report made clear the solution is beyond the NCAA's reach: "Congress is the only entity that can grant that stability.''

More things for government to argue about.
Just to be clear this government involvement was not related to the 90-team tournament recommendation but to issues related to NIL. The full quote: "As for rules related to athletes cashing in with celebrity endorsement deals -- a profound change over the past 18 months in college sports -- the committee's report made clear the solution is beyond the NCAA's reach: 'Congress is the only entity that can grant that stability.'''
Your use of the quote is totally out of context as to what problem the "solution" is refering too. Nice job for an astute and former journalist. And her actual quote and what the quote references is 110% accurate, and something I have had to say 1000 times because some just do not get it. The NCAA is powerless to deal with the NIL situation.

per our AD: "As for rules related to athletes cashing in with celebrity endorsement deals -- a profound change over the past 18 months in college sports -- the committee's report made clear the solution is beyond the NCAA's reach: "Congress is the only entity that can grant that stability.''
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,677
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 1/4/2023 3:58 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Our very own Julie Cromer co-leading the charge.

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/35372595/n...
Great

"-- the committee's report made clear the solution is beyond the NCAA's reach: "Congress is the only entity that can grant that stability.''

More things for government to argue about.
Just to be clear this government involvement was not related to the 90-team tournament recommendation but to issues related to NIL. The full quote: "As for rules related to athletes cashing in with celebrity endorsement deals -- a profound change over the past 18 months in college sports -- the committee's report made clear the solution is beyond the NCAA's reach: 'Congress is the only entity that can grant that stability.'''
Your use of the quote is totally out of context as to what problem the "solution" is refering too. Nice job for an astute and former journalist. And her actual quote and what the quote references is 110% accurate, and something I have had to say 1000 times because some just do not get it. The NCAA is powerless to deal with the NIL situation.

per our AD: "As for rules related to athletes cashing in with celebrity endorsement deals -- a profound change over the past 18 months in college sports -- the committee's report made clear the solution is beyond the NCAA's reach: "Congress is the only entity that can grant that stability.''
Not sure what you are trying to say here. You seem to be agreeing with me and at the same time taking potshots at me. Color me confused.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,793
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 1/5/2023 10:35 AM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
Our very own Julie Cromer co-leading the charge.

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/35372595/n...
Great

"-- the committee's report made clear the solution is beyond the NCAA's reach: "Congress is the only entity that can grant that stability.''

More things for government to argue about.
Just to be clear this government involvement was not related to the 90-team tournament recommendation but to issues related to NIL. The full quote: "As for rules related to athletes cashing in with celebrity endorsement deals -- a profound change over the past 18 months in college sports -- the committee's report made clear the solution is beyond the NCAA's reach: 'Congress is the only entity that can grant that stability.'''
Your use of the quote is totally out of context as to what problem the "solution" is refering too. Nice job for an astute and former journalist. And her actual quote and what the quote references is 110% accurate, and something I have had to say 1000 times because some just do not get it. The NCAA is powerless to deal with the NIL situation.

per our AD: "As for rules related to athletes cashing in with celebrity endorsement deals -- a profound change over the past 18 months in college sports -- the committee's report made clear the solution is beyond the NCAA's reach: "Congress is the only entity that can grant that stability.''
Not sure what you are trying to say here. You seem to be agreeing with me and at the same time taking potshots at me. Color me confused.
No, I was not agreeing with you. I pointed out that you butchered the quote to make your own point, that was poor journalism.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,677
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 1/5/2023 11:42 AM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Our very own Julie Cromer co-leading the charge.

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/35372595/n...
Great

"-- the committee's report made clear the solution is beyond the NCAA's reach: "Congress is the only entity that can grant that stability.''

More things for government to argue about.
Just to be clear this government involvement was not related to the 90-team tournament recommendation but to issues related to NIL. The full quote: "As for rules related to athletes cashing in with celebrity endorsement deals -- a profound change over the past 18 months in college sports -- the committee's report made clear the solution is beyond the NCAA's reach: 'Congress is the only entity that can grant that stability.'''
Your use of the quote is totally out of context as to what problem the "solution" is refering too. Nice job for an astute and former journalist. And her actual quote and what the quote references is 110% accurate, and something I have had to say 1000 times because some just do not get it. The NCAA is powerless to deal with the NIL situation.

per our AD: "As for rules related to athletes cashing in with celebrity endorsement deals -- a profound change over the past 18 months in college sports -- the committee's report made clear the solution is beyond the NCAA's reach: "Congress is the only entity that can grant that stability.''
Not sure what you are trying to say here. You seem to be agreeing with me and at the same time taking potshots at me. Color me confused.
No, I was not agreeing with you. I pointed out that you butchered the quote to make your own point, that was poor journalism.
But, you and I were making the same point. I think you missed the point that I was responding to someone who didn't use the full quote as you and I did.
Showing Messages: 1 - 7 of 7
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)