Louisville sure doesn't know about this rule.
Really? Are you implying every team U of L has seen this year has done exactly what the scout said they would do? NO one came out and surprised them with a performance they were not prepared for? I dont expect they had ST on their radar nor did they probably expect IVO to spend an eternity on the bench...yet they found themselves having to step up and adjust the same way we did tonite.
Perhaps I am misunderstanding your point.
I read it as a comment about how U of L almost got smoked at home by WKU tonight.
Also, FYI to everyone responding, this thread started before the game tipped off, which makes it read more predictiony (not a word, oh well) and a little less negative to me.
Louisville was going to be my example too. Winning ugly, close games night in and night out.
What would a top 25 team do?
They'd find a way to win. Somebody would step up, and it won't be the same person every game.
Some fun facts:
Times lead team in scoring
Cooper 7
Offutt 2
Keely 2
Kellogg 1
Baltic 1
Taylor 1
(Due to ties, these numbers won't total 12)
Times lead team in rebounds
Baltic 5
Offutt 3
Keely 3
Cooper 2
Goard 1
Smith 1
Johnson 1
(Due to ties, these numbers won't total 12)
Double figure scoring games
Cooper 10
Offutt 8
Baltic 7
Keely 7
Kellogg 5
Taylor 5
Hall 2
Smith 1
Johnson 1
A little math reveals that, on average, we have close to four guys in double-digits on any given night. Nine players have done it, and six more than five times.
Six players have led the team in scoring, and seven in rebounding. This is a team that, on any given night, ANYONE up to about ten deep can have a huge night. With that many pieces, the chances of everybody being down at once are low, and it makes things hell for an opposing coach. Who, pray tell, do you focus your efforts on?
This is a really, really fun team to watch, and the talent runs deep.