Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Official Game 30 Thread: UMass
Page: 2 of 3
FearLeon
General User
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 5,126
mail
FearLeon
mail
Posted: 3/3/2026 9:26 PM
bobcatsquared wrote:expand_more
I can't believe Sheldon's replacement next year won't be an improvement. The same can be said for whoever is our first big man off the bench compared to Breath this year. It's going to be a major challenge to replace Pav at the point. And all three of these replacements are probably not currently on our roster.
One of many poor decisions by Boals that will cost him his job. Still can’t believe that he and his staff went into the season with Sheldon as the starting shooting guard playing 30+ minutes a game.

Coaching malpractice.

Program is a shitcapade.
Bobcat1998
General User
B1998
Member Since: 11/7/2012
Post Count: 2,759
person
mail
Bobcat1998
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 5:25 AM
FearLeon wrote:expand_more
I can't believe Sheldon's replacement next year won't be an improvement. The same can be said for whoever is our first big man off the bench compared to Breath this year. It's going to be a major challenge to replace Pav at the point. And all three of these replacements are probably not currently on our roster.
One of many poor decisions by Boals that will cost him his job. Still can’t believe that he and his staff went into the season with Sheldon as the starting shooting guard playing 30+ minutes a game.

Coaching malpractice.

Program is a shitcapade.
Coaching malpractice additives:
1. Deciding Hadaway was a main offensive weapon and running offense through him aas a Point Forward
2. Swing and miss HORRIBLY on Conners and Breath
3. Not playing Kuany enough
4. In a s#&t show of a year not giving more extended looks at Burris, Fisher and Evans. This has been a staple of the Boals era: recruit 2 to 3 dudes a year he and his staff never develops and then gives up on and we all hope they transfer. Has he developed more than a few guys himself?
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,809
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 10:41 AM
Bobcat1998 wrote:expand_more
2. Swing and miss HORRIBLY on Conners and Breath
I'm not sure why we need to keep repeating this, the coaching malpractice isn't they chose Conners and Breath in the offseason. Those were great moves at the time for a team that desperately needed help. The malpractice is not having a system available for those guys to succeed.

Breath was a 7/7 guy for two seasons at Greensboro and played 20+ minutes a game. I don't think he got worse as a basketball player, just our staff has absolutely no idea how to use him effectively. Same goes for Conners, who averaged 8 ppg and shot 40% from three at App State. Did he just all of a sudden forget how to shoot the ball? More than likely no, he just doesn't have an offense that works for him.

If you wanna say those are swings and misses, blame the batters, not the pitches they chose.
Last Edited: 3/4/2026 10:42:45 AM by GoCats105
OUbobcat9092
General User
OU9092
Member Since: 12/28/2004
Location: Fairfax, VA
Post Count: 1,279
person
mail
OUbobcat9092
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 10:45 AM
I enjoyed watching Kuany fly around last night and cause havoc with his length to whomever he was guarding.

Hoping we can keep him aboard with Kelly and Simmons for next year.
Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,631
mail
Andrew Ruck
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 10:51 AM
Another terrible night shooting the 3. Clearly missed JJ's defense, got beat off the dribble way too much. Not pretty. I thought Kuany was solid except we have yet another chapter in the deep recent history of bigs that think they can shoot the 3 but can't. From Carter to Clayton to Hadaway and Simmons and now Kuany.

Given our inability to beat Toledo, maybe a downgrade to the 6 seed would be a blessing.
FJC31
General User
FJC31
Member Since: 3/31/2022
Post Count: 2,243
person
mail
FJC31
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 11:36 AM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
2. Swing and miss HORRIBLY on Conners and Breath
I'm not sure why we need to keep repeating this, the coaching malpractice isn't they chose Conners and Breath in the offseason. Those were great moves at the time for a team that desperately needed help. The malpractice is not having a system available for those guys to succeed.

Breath was a 7/7 guy for two seasons at Greensboro and played 20+ minutes a game. I don't think he got worse as a basketball player, just our staff has absolutely no idea how to use him effectively. Same goes for Conners, who averaged 8 ppg and shot 40% from three at App State. Did he just all of a sudden forget how to shoot the ball? More than likely no, he just doesn't have an offense that works for him.

If you wanna say those are swings and misses, blame the batters, not the pitches they chose.
This. +1. The Breath and Conners slander is misdirected. We never saw Breath play alongside Simmons. Both played way less than they did a year ago in questionable favor in others. Give these two half of the minutes (and actual set involvement) given to Sheldon and I think this is a different conversation.

Imagine if we ran a set offense to get guys like Conners and Burris looks from three? We'd likely have better spacing and shooting results overall.
SBH
General User
SBH
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,670
person
mail
SBH
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 11:42 AM
I don't get the Burris love. He's not killing it offensively and is a step or two slow on D. Never going to be a stud.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,809
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 12:25 PM
SBH wrote:expand_more
I don't get the Burris love. He's not killing it offensively and is a step or two slow on D. Never going to be a stud.
Yeah I don't get this either. As a spot up shooter or a one dribble pull up midrange, he's solid. He "could" be a 3-and-D type guy if given the right defensive assignment, but other teams will take advantage of his slow feet and make sure he ends up guarding someone he shouldn't as the result of screens and switches.

And apparently he was recruited as a PG (at least he was in HS), but he doesn't have the handle for that at this level either.
spongeBOB CATpants
General User
Member Since: 8/16/2016
Post Count: 1,348
mail
spongeBOB CATpants
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 12:26 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
2. Swing and miss HORRIBLY on Conners and Breath
I'm not sure why we need to keep repeating this, the coaching malpractice isn't they chose Conners and Breath in the offseason. Those were great moves at the time for a team that desperately needed help. The malpractice is not having a system available for those guys to succeed.

Breath was a 7/7 guy for two seasons at Greensboro and played 20+ minutes a game. I don't think he got worse as a basketball player, just our staff has absolutely no idea how to use him effectively. Same goes for Conners, who averaged 8 ppg and shot 40% from three at App State. Did he just all of a sudden forget how to shoot the ball? More than likely no, he just doesn't have an offense that works for him.

If you wanna say those are swings and misses, blame the batters, not the pitches they chose.
I just simply disagree. We have 3 dudes that put up numbers, they are starters for a reason, they are talented. While Boals record is bad, nobody has any clue what the actual "system" is from the inside and practice nor would we have any idea what an ideal system for those guys off the bench would be. You could argue that its Boals job to find out but I'm firmly on the side that good players can adjust after an entire year. They just simply are not as good as we thought they were even though they checked boxes at the time of signing.
FearLeon
General User
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 5,126
mail
FearLeon
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 12:30 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
I don't get the Burris love. He's not killing it offensively and is a step or two slow on D. Never going to be a stud.
Yeah I don't get this either. As a spot up shooter or a one dribble pull up midrange, he's solid. He "could" be a 3-and-D type guy if given the right defensive assignment, but other teams will take advantage of his slow feet and make sure he ends up guarding someone he shouldn't as the result of screens and switches.

And apparently he was recruited as a PG (at least he was in HS), but he doesn't have the handle for that at this level either.
Thank you. I know Walking Bucket has his supporters here, but we've seen enough of a sample size to know he's never going to be a 15-20 minute guy at Ohio.

Too slow.

I've got Walking Bucket hitting the portal after the season. He can start and excel at Ohio Northern and play 32+ minutes per game. Does anyone think Walking Bucket is going to turn into Dave Jamerson or Tommy Freeman?
Last Edited: 3/4/2026 12:39:46 PM by FearLeon
BobcatSports
General User
BS
Member Since: 2/2/2006
Post Count: 1,116
person
mail
BobcatSports
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 12:41 PM
Leon I likewise don’t know IF Burris will become Tommy Freeman 2.0 BUT a guy who knows Tommy and his game quite well (Tommie’s Dad) has stated he likes some of what he has seen of Burris.
FearLeon
General User
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 5,126
mail
FearLeon
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 12:48 PM
BobcatSports wrote:expand_more
Leon I likewise don’t know IF Burris will become Tommy Freeman 2.0 BUT a guy who knows Tommy and his game quite well (Tommie’s Dad) has stated he likes some of what he has seen of Burris.
Curious what Born says. My take is Tommy had a much quicker release with his shot and played much better defense and handled the ball better...and he took the charge every chance he got. He was a fantastic Bobcat. Just my 2 cents.
Diamond Cat
General User
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 972
mail
Diamond Cat
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 1:10 PM
There are not many Tommy Freeman's for us to get. I don't wish anything bad on Burris. I just think some of the points made are valid in terms of talent gaps.

I do think we would have a solid group on the floor if Simmons, Kelly and Kuany return but who knows if that will happen.

Serious question: Has Breath been playing hurt most of the season? Something in the way he walks doesn't look right. He also doesn't seem to have much of an explosive jump on the boards. Just curious.
ohiocatfan1
General User
O1
Member Since: 9/6/2016
Post Count: 396
person
mail
ohiocatfan1
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 1:25 PM
Folks we do not have talent end of story.
FJC31
General User
FJC31
Member Since: 3/31/2022
Post Count: 2,243
person
mail
FJC31
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 1:25 PM
spongeBOB CATpants wrote:expand_more
2. Swing and miss HORRIBLY on Conners and Breath
I'm not sure why we need to keep repeating this, the coaching malpractice isn't they chose Conners and Breath in the offseason. Those were great moves at the time for a team that desperately needed help. The malpractice is not having a system available for those guys to succeed.

Breath was a 7/7 guy for two seasons at Greensboro and played 20+ minutes a game. I don't think he got worse as a basketball player, just our staff has absolutely no idea how to use him effectively. Same goes for Conners, who averaged 8 ppg and shot 40% from three at App State. Did he just all of a sudden forget how to shoot the ball? More than likely no, he just doesn't have an offense that works for him.

If you wanna say those are swings and misses, blame the batters, not the pitches they chose.
I just simply disagree. We have 3 dudes that put up numbers, they are starters for a reason, they are talented. While Boals record is bad, nobody has any clue what the actual "system" is from the inside and practice nor would we have any idea what an ideal system for those guys off the bench would be. You could argue that its Boals job to find out but I'm firmly on the side that good players can adjust after an entire year. They just simply are not as good as we thought they were even though they checked boxes at the time of signing.
This is a wild take. It is Boals' (or any coach for that matter) job to find out how players fit their systems and maximize them.

In 60 starts at UNCG in the SoCon (superior to the MAC), Breath averaged 7/7 while leading the entire conference in defensive rating and defensive rebounding % last year; and led the SoCon in offensive rebounding % in 23/24.

And you're just concluding that he's just not that good now for no reason other than himself? Got it.
Last Edited: 3/4/2026 1:26:22 PM by FJC31
FJC31
General User
FJC31
Member Since: 3/31/2022
Post Count: 2,243
person
mail
FJC31
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 1:31 PM
SBH wrote:expand_more
I don't get the Burris love. He's not killing it offensively and is a step or two slow on D. Never going to be a stud.
I wouldn't call it "love" for Burris, but I've always wondered if our overall 3PT shooting would improve with set plays Conners, Burris, and Sheldon as specialists.
spongeBOB CATpants
General User
Member Since: 8/16/2016
Post Count: 1,348
mail
spongeBOB CATpants
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 1:46 PM
FJC31 wrote:expand_more
2. Swing and miss HORRIBLY on Conners and Breath
I'm not sure why we need to keep repeating this, the coaching malpractice isn't they chose Conners and Breath in the offseason. Those were great moves at the time for a team that desperately needed help. The malpractice is not having a system available for those guys to succeed.

Breath was a 7/7 guy for two seasons at Greensboro and played 20+ minutes a game. I don't think he got worse as a basketball player, just our staff has absolutely no idea how to use him effectively. Same goes for Conners, who averaged 8 ppg and shot 40% from three at App State. Did he just all of a sudden forget how to shoot the ball? More than likely no, he just doesn't have an offense that works for him.

If you wanna say those are swings and misses, blame the batters, not the pitches they chose.
I just simply disagree. We have 3 dudes that put up numbers, they are starters for a reason, they are talented. While Boals record is bad, nobody has any clue what the actual "system" is from the inside and practice nor would we have any idea what an ideal system for those guys off the bench would be. You could argue that its Boals job to find out but I'm firmly on the side that good players can adjust after an entire year. They just simply are not as good as we thought they were even though they checked boxes at the time of signing.
This is a wild take. It is Boals' (or any coach for that matter) job to find out how players fit their systems and maximize them.

In 60 starts at UNCG in the SoCon (superior to the MAC), Breath averaged 7/7 while leading the entire conference in defensive rating and defensive rebounding % last year; and led the SoCon in offensive rebounding % in 23/24.

And you're just concluding that he's just not that good now for no reason other than himself? Got it.
Pretty much yeah. Regression happens all the time in every program and every sport. Ask me how I know.

I agree Boals deserve a lot of blame, he's the head of the ship after all and his job is to figure it out. He didn't have these guys for longer than a summer and fall camp so I'm cutting him some slack on these 2 newbies.

Also wanted to add, Breath only earned 1 start this year at Ohio. Due to Simmons being hurt. He does have decent defensive stats but has been extremely weak with the ball.
Last Edited: 3/4/2026 1:52:38 PM by spongeBOB CATpants
FJC31
General User
FJC31
Member Since: 3/31/2022
Post Count: 2,243
person
mail
FJC31
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 2:42 PM
spongeBOB CATpants wrote:expand_more
2. Swing and miss HORRIBLY on Conners and Breath
I'm not sure why we need to keep repeating this, the coaching malpractice isn't they chose Conners and Breath in the offseason. Those were great moves at the time for a team that desperately needed help. The malpractice is not having a system available for those guys to succeed.

Breath was a 7/7 guy for two seasons at Greensboro and played 20+ minutes a game. I don't think he got worse as a basketball player, just our staff has absolutely no idea how to use him effectively. Same goes for Conners, who averaged 8 ppg and shot 40% from three at App State. Did he just all of a sudden forget how to shoot the ball? More than likely no, he just doesn't have an offense that works for him.

If you wanna say those are swings and misses, blame the batters, not the pitches they chose.
I just simply disagree. We have 3 dudes that put up numbers, they are starters for a reason, they are talented. While Boals record is bad, nobody has any clue what the actual "system" is from the inside and practice nor would we have any idea what an ideal system for those guys off the bench would be. You could argue that its Boals job to find out but I'm firmly on the side that good players can adjust after an entire year. They just simply are not as good as we thought they were even though they checked boxes at the time of signing.
This is a wild take. It is Boals' (or any coach for that matter) job to find out how players fit their systems and maximize them.

In 60 starts at UNCG in the SoCon (superior to the MAC), Breath averaged 7/7 while leading the entire conference in defensive rating and defensive rebounding % last year; and led the SoCon in offensive rebounding % in 23/24.

And you're just concluding that he's just not that good now for no reason other than himself? Got it.
Pretty much yeah. Regression happens all the time in every program and every sport. Ask me how I know.

I agree Boals deserve a lot of blame, he's the head of the ship after all and his job is to figure it out. He didn't have these guys for longer than a summer and fall camp so I'm cutting him some slack on these 2 newbies.

Also wanted to add, Breath only earned 1 start this year at Ohio. Due to Simmons being hurt. He does have decent defensive stats but has been extremely weak with the ball.
With that logic, what's your conclusion on every holdover player who doesn't improve? You know, players who Boals and co. have had for longer than one summer and fall camp. Meanwhile, his teams continue to regress.

As for Breath, I shared this small sample size in another thread --

"Simmons is the superior player of the three.

FWIW and this is a super small and cherry picking sample size -- when Breath has attempted at least 7 shots (3x), he's averaging 13ppg while shooting 63%.

When he's attempted at least 4 shots (5x), he's averaging 10.4ppg while still shooting 63%.

He's averaging 4rpg in those spans. Conners was always supposed to be a 3PT specialist. From what I recall, he had more set plays ran for him at App State. His 3PT attempts are down from last year per game from 5.2 to 2.8. Overall FG from 6.5 to 3.9.

The outcome has been disappointing for both, but Connors is playing 17mpg less and Breath playing 8mpg less than a year ago. I think they're lack of impact has had more to do with inconsistent playing time and touches for a team that doesn't have a set offense more than actual ability. Are we really surprised neither has been able to catch a groove with such little involvement?"

Is he actually weak with the ball? Or is his lack of production tied to the above?
GraffZ06
General User
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Dayton, OH
Post Count: 2,433
mail
GraffZ06
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 3:09 PM
Burris (and to a lesser extent Conners) both have great shooting strokes from 3. They are both better shooters than their stats this year say. Mostly because neither are quick enough or athletic enough to create spacing for their own shot. They need a screen. A set play. Ball swinging side to side. Something to create space FOR THEM. Everybody shoots worse when rushed, or with a hand in their face.

Don't get me started on Breath. His per minute and per possession stats are tremendous. Hes our best defensive big by a mile. His lack of PT (assumption to appease Hadaway and Simmons) is cruel. He should have been starting day one. At this point hes checked out. I dont blame him one second. Watch the two buffoons whine and cry and flex their way to a first round exit.
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User
BLSS
Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,640
person
mail
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 3:10 PM
FJC31 wrote:expand_more
Is he actually weak with the ball? Or is his lack of production tied to the above?
Breath has finished better this year than he has at any point in his career.

But he's reverted back to sub 50% free throw shooting after shooting 68% last year. Simmons FT shooting percentage has also fallen. Given how much Simmons gets to the line, which he does at an elite rate, he would be one of the most efficient players in the country if he made free throws at the same rate he did at Toledo.

We're a bad shooting team. We have been for years now. Shooting can be coached, and it seems like we struggle with it.
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User
BLSS
Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,640
person
mail
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 3:14 PM
GraffZ06 wrote:expand_more
Burris (and to a lesser extent Conners) both have great shooting strokes from 3. They are both better shooters than their stats this year say. Mostly because neither are quick enough or athletic enough to create spacing for their own shot. They need a screen. A set play. Ball swinging side to side. Something to create space FOR THEM. Everybody shoots worse when rushed, or with a hand in their face.
I don't think this is true of Connors. He seems plenty athletic. The bigger issue is that he likes the ball in his hands, and Boals never gives him the ball. He is exclusively a catch and shoot guy now. Not playing to his strengths at all.

GraffZ06 wrote:expand_more
Don't get me started on Breath. His per minute and per possession stats are tremendous. Hes our best defensive big by a mile. His lack of PT (assumption to appease Hadaway and Simmons) is cruel. He should have been starting day one. At this point hes checked out. I dont blame him one second. Watch the two buffoons whine and cry and flex their way to a first round exit.
You can't play a big who shoots 40% from the free throw line big minutes. You decided early on he should get more of Simmons minutes and despite all evidence to the contrary, you're still beating this drum.
bobcatsquared
General User
B
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 5,844
person
mail
bobcatsquared
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 4:20 PM
GraffZ06 wrote:expand_more
Burris (and to a lesser extent Conners) both have great shooting strokes from 3. They are both better shooters than their stats this year say. Mostly because neither are quick enough or athletic enough to create spacing for their own shot.
I would add for Conners that he has a low release point, meaning he needs even more space than others to get his shot off.

Burris, on the other hand, has nice form and I'm still optismistic that he can become a consistent scorer in this league. He's shown flashes of what he can do with some minutes this year, most notably the first UMass game and to a lesser degree the first UT game and also versus Miami.
Last Edited: 3/4/2026 4:25:19 PM by bobcatsquared
BobcatsFan2026
General User
BF2026
Member Since: 3/4/2026
Post Count: 1
person
mail
BobcatsFan2026
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 4:26 PM
I’ve been reading this board for several years now. There have been some good points here and there, but honestly a lot of what I read leaves me shaking my head. Sometimes it feels like a lot of the posts are based on surface level basketball knowledge rather than actually watching what’s happening on the floor.

Just a few thoughts on this season from someone who has watched a lot of these games.

First, I do think this team could benefit from a little more discipline and accountability at times. I have no doubt the coaching staff cares deeply about the school, the program, and these players. You can see the passion on the sideline. At times though it feels like a lot of energy goes toward arguing calls. Working officials is part of the game, but usually the most effective conversations with refs are brief, specific, and at the right moment. Players often reflect the emotional tone of the bench, so finding that balance can go a long way.

Hadaway is a good example. He’s clearly a very emotional competitor, which is not a bad thing. But learning how to channel that emotion the right way is important. When he’s focused and locked in he brings a lot to the team.

Sheldon - The hate he gets on this board is ridiculous. I’ve read that he’s not a good shooter, not athletic, and shouldn’t even be playing. None of that really lines up with what I see. He’s actually a very good shooter when he’s under control. Putting him in spots where he can get those higher percentage looks would help both him and the team. He’s also more athletic than people give him credit for and brings a lot of energy. Sometimes that energy helps the team and sometimes it gets a little out of control, especially when he’s tired. Film study and experience usually help players figure that out.

Pav - He doesn’t pass the look test, but he fools people. He’s a phenomenal offensive player and has carried this team on more than one occasion. I would like to see him trust his teammates a little more at times and keep the ball moving. He also looks worn down from playing a lot of minutes. Defensively there is still room for growth, but offensively he has been a big piece for this team.

Javon - He’s had some really high highs and a few lows this season. When he’s just playing and not focused on refs or the other team, he can be really hard to stop. Like a lot of competitive players, learning when and how to use that emotion to your advantage is part of the growth process.

JJ - People get so focused on his speed and athleticism that they sometimes overlook the basketball IQ side of things. He’s clearly the fastest and most athletic player on the team, and that allows him to recover from some mistakes. But he does get beat on straight line drives and back cuts more than you’d like to see. Also notice why he sometimes gets open looks for dunks or threes. Teams often sag off him and use that defender to help on Pav and Javon.

Kiir - Off the charts athleticism but still very raw. He gets lost on both ends of the floor at times, which is pretty normal for young players with his skill set. It will be interesting to see how much he improves over the summer.

Jalen - Kind of a head scratcher this year. It has not been his best season. Sometimes players who come in with high expectations have a harder time adjusting when things do not go exactly how they thought they would. He also seems like someone who has trouble moving on after a missed shot.

Connors - A really good shooter when he’s in the flow of the offense. The challenge for this team has been ball movement. When the ball sticks and possessions get stagnant, shooters often end up feeling like they have to take the shot when it finally comes their way.

Burris - Similar to Pav in that he does not necessarily pass the look test, but if you watch him closely he’s quicker and more athletic than people think. He can shoot the three and has a really nice pull up game. Like Connors, it sometimes looks like he knows his touches will be limited so when he gets the ball he feels like he needs to make something happen.

Another thing I would like to see this team improve at is recognizing and attacking advantages during the game. When we get a mismatch or a favorable matchup, we do not always seem to go back to it consistently. Good teams recognize those moments and keep exploiting them until the defense adjusts.

Along those same lines, making adjustments during the game is always important. Whether that is at halftime or during timeouts, finding ways to respond to what the other team is doing can make a big difference.

One last thing that gets lost in some of these discussions on this board is that every player on this roster belongs at this level. Every one of these guys was recruited by other Division I programs and chose Ohio University for their own reasons. They did not just end up here by accident. Fans will always debate playing time and roles, but these are all Division I players.

At the end of the day, I would just like to see the offense run more sets for the shooters Sheldon, Burris, and Connors. When those guys are involved it stretches the floor and opens things up inside for Pav, Hadaway, and Javon.

Right now the ball sticks a little too much and the offense ends up being harder than it needs to be.
spongeBOB CATpants
General User
Member Since: 8/16/2016
Post Count: 1,348
mail
spongeBOB CATpants
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 4:44 PM
FJC31 wrote:expand_more
2. Swing and miss HORRIBLY on Conners and Breath
I'm not sure why we need to keep repeating this, the coaching malpractice isn't they chose Conners and Breath in the offseason. Those were great moves at the time for a team that desperately needed help. The malpractice is not having a system available for those guys to succeed.

Breath was a 7/7 guy for two seasons at Greensboro and played 20+ minutes a game. I don't think he got worse as a basketball player, just our staff has absolutely no idea how to use him effectively. Same goes for Conners, who averaged 8 ppg and shot 40% from three at App State. Did he just all of a sudden forget how to shoot the ball? More than likely no, he just doesn't have an offense that works for him.

If you wanna say those are swings and misses, blame the batters, not the pitches they chose.
I just simply disagree. We have 3 dudes that put up numbers, they are starters for a reason, they are talented. While Boals record is bad, nobody has any clue what the actual "system" is from the inside and practice nor would we have any idea what an ideal system for those guys off the bench would be. You could argue that its Boals job to find out but I'm firmly on the side that good players can adjust after an entire year. They just simply are not as good as we thought they were even though they checked boxes at the time of signing.
This is a wild take. It is Boals' (or any coach for that matter) job to find out how players fit their systems and maximize them.

In 60 starts at UNCG in the SoCon (superior to the MAC), Breath averaged 7/7 while leading the entire conference in defensive rating and defensive rebounding % last year; and led the SoCon in offensive rebounding % in 23/24.

And you're just concluding that he's just not that good now for no reason other than himself? Got it.
Pretty much yeah. Regression happens all the time in every program and every sport. Ask me how I know.

I agree Boals deserve a lot of blame, he's the head of the ship after all and his job is to figure it out. He didn't have these guys for longer than a summer and fall camp so I'm cutting him some slack on these 2 newbies.

Also wanted to add, Breath only earned 1 start this year at Ohio. Due to Simmons being hurt. He does have decent defensive stats but has been extremely weak with the ball.
With that logic, what's your conclusion on every holdover player who doesn't improve? You know, players who Boals and co. have had for longer than one summer and fall camp. Meanwhile, his teams continue to regress.

As for Breath, I shared this small sample size in another thread --

"Simmons is the superior player of the three.

FWIW and this is a super small and cherry picking sample size -- when Breath has attempted at least 7 shots (3x), he's averaging 13ppg while shooting 63%.

When he's attempted at least 4 shots (5x), he's averaging 10.4ppg while still shooting 63%.

He's averaging 4rpg in those spans. Conners was always supposed to be a 3PT specialist. From what I recall, he had more set plays ran for him at App State. His 3PT attempts are down from last year per game from 5.2 to 2.8. Overall FG from 6.5 to 3.9.

The outcome has been disappointing for both, but Connors is playing 17mpg less and Breath playing 8mpg less than a year ago. I think they're lack of impact has had more to do with inconsistent playing time and touches for a team that doesn't have a set offense more than actual ability. Are we really surprised neither has been able to catch a groove with such little involvement?"

Is he actually weak with the ball? Or is his lack of production tied to the above?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not going to sit here and hype up a Boals extension. Like I said he deserves plenty of blame I guess the path for more minutes for these two specifically had roadblocks.

Breath was never going to start nor get a ton of minutes (Kuany also factors) so playing him much more than what he was getting is a tough ask when you have two other all-mac bigs. IMO this wasn't a super great fit for a guy in his grad year looking for one last run, especially with 60 starts under his belt in a superior conference. Maybe his options were limited, who knows.

The Conners situation is much different and I don't disagree that its hard for a 3pt guy to get in a groove when not playing as much. At the end of the day, I think you have to play the guys that are actually proving themselves in games. As much as we want less minutes from Sheldon, he's shooting 38% from deep. Conners is 27%. I can already hear the whataboutism with Hadaway shooting 27% on 131 attempts, that's coaching malpractice and a different conversation. Tough situation for everybody and I wish it would've worked out differently because you hate to see guys' last year strapping up end in a disappointing season.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,809
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 3/4/2026 5:27 PM
BobcatsFan2026 wrote:expand_more
Sheldon - The hate he gets on this board is ridiculous. I’ve read that he’s not a good shooter, not athletic, and shouldn’t even be playing. None of that really lines up with what I see. He’s actually a very good shooter when he’s under control. Putting him in spots where he can get those higher percentage looks would help both him and the team. He’s also more athletic than people give him credit for and brings a lot of energy. Sometimes that energy helps the team and sometimes it gets a little out of control, especially when he’s tired. Film study and experience usually help players figure that out.

At the end of the day, I would just like to see the offense run more sets for the shooters Sheldon, Burris, and Connors. When those guys are involved it stretches the floor and opens things up inside for Pav, Hadaway, and Javon.

Right now the ball sticks a little too much and the offense ends up being harder than it needs to be.
Welcome to the board and thanks for the very detailed post. You obviously know ball to a degree.

You make a lot of good points and my only rebuttal is that of Sheldon. I don't think a lot of posters on this board throw hate toward him, moreso that we point out his obvious limitations in his basketball ability and his rewarded minutes is totally off base. You point out his attributes: he is a great shooter under control, yet too often he is taking off-balanced, fading away, off the dribble threes. So to steal a line from "Moneyball": if he's a good shooter then why doesn't he shoot good? Is it a coaching thing? Does the offense not flow well enough for him? Are they running sets to get him open?

You also mentioned film study in his critique. He's a Senior and I gotta say, if he hasn't figured it out by now through film study, he probably isn't going to. He's played in over 100 games. He hasn't figured out through film that he shouldn't throw up an out of control layup against a bigger defender? Or turn the ball over because you got caught jumping in the air without a planned shot?

For all I know he's a great kid, plays hard and hustles his ass off. But his energy can't be everything. At some point, he needs to put the ball in the hole, which he hasn't done efficiently enough for the minutes he plays. He's a role player, and the coaching staff has him playing minutes of someone who counted on for more than that. For that, he needs to make a lot more shots (and take better ones).

Again, none of this is hate. Multiple times throughout the season someone has posted his advanced stats here, and while they are not everything, they tell you a lot about how a player is performing. For a while, he was Grade A butt. Even he would probably tell you that. He has improved slightly throughout the year, but not at the level that this team needs.
Showing Messages: 26 - 50 of 61



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)