He isn't the leading returning scorer -- Pavs is. And I think people underestimate how good Pavs was offensively in the second half of the season. It's going to piss off some folks here, but Pavs is gonna be our number one option next year.
He was much better on the offensive end the second half of the season. But as good as he is at making contested mid-range jumpers in the lane (because he can't shoot 3s or get to the hoop and finish) - you're relying on your "go to guy" to score at the absolute worst statistical option in basketball. And he's still literally terrible at defense.
If he's our #1 option next year, we will fail, and it probably should cost Boals his job.
Next year is play on Saturday in Cleveland or bust.
Here we go again. So, none of the other recruiting mishaps should have costed Boals his job, but Pavs being the returning leading scorer should? Got it.
No no, focus on my last sentence. I've stated that I think we should judge coaches based on their performance in March, and that we should be making it to the conference finals on average once every 5 years.
In his last 4 years in Cleveland, Boals is 3-4 with 0 finals appearances.
Next year is put up or shut up time IMO. Oh sure, because we're financially strapped and he did win an NCAA game he might get extra leeway for a season or two, but at that point it's not just make it to Saturday - it's NCAA or bust.
In relataion to Pavs, my only point was if he's our #1 option next year, I think our chances of making it to Saturday are small. Thus possibly costing Boals his job.
If we make it to Saturday and Pavs is our #1 or the 13th guy on the bench, Boals will be fine.
Well, I mean, yea because your last sentence has been the focal point of your previous three posts -- Pavs is the main issue with the current roster construction and if the number 1 scoring option, we're screwed next year and Boals should be fired.
Meanwhile and leading up to the end of the season, you defended the current roster construction in the likes of Evans specifically, as if the continuity of the lack of performing bigs wasn't enough for Boals to get fired. In fact, you really dug your heels in that Boals could essentially do no wrong and his current strategy was a byproduct of current CBB environment. We just added two portal bigs ICYMI.
But because now your favorite whipping boy (despite BLSS debunking your false statistical claims of his offensive game) might lead us in scoring scoring, THIS is the straw that breaks the camels back for you to think Boals should be canned.
As for Pavs himself, I'd ask how short your memory was as it relates to the final game of the season. But I'm guessing Pavs nearly single-handedly willing us to a win over Toledo had you punching the air somewhere.
There was no AJB, a broken down AJC, and a less than 100% Hadaway in that game. Yet, Pavs put up 28 points and had us in the lead going into the final seconds of regulation.
Is Pavs being the number 1 option actually a problem? Or does it become a problem when he's the only option scoring? I think you can figure that out.