I don't know how to overcome our apparent indifference. But I'll say again: This team appears ripe for a tournament loss to an average team. Too many holes at times--shooting, lack of movement, rebounding, defense for less than 40 minutes per contest.
On the other hand, playing well enough to make a big mark in Cleveland is well within our capability.
I don't have the time..sorry...but I'd like to see some analysis of our last dozen or so games of the year for recent seasons.. Season's almost over and I'd hope we wouldn't play a game with so much stink minutes as we did last night.
Last 10 regular season games, post season games:
06/07: 5-5, 1-1
07/08: 5-5, 1-2
08/09: 4-6, 1-1
09/10: 6-4, 5-1
10/11: 7-3, 2-2
Analyse away.
Thanks for your effort, RS. We're barely over .500 at the key stretch. Is anyone very satisfied with that?
Be mindful of the fact that two of the years your referring to above are Tim O'Shea years. Take away 06/07, 07/08 and your numbers are a little different.
I thought this was the year we could go 8/9 deep and put a lot of pressure on teams. Seems like since MAC play the number of possessions and points per game has gone down a lot. We hadn't scored 70 for quite a few games because we pass around the perimeter for 30 seconds and don't attack the rim. If we really have 7/8 superior athletes why not go after people full court more and up the tempo?
I think there are two things here: First, on the full court pressure, we do force a lot of turnovers per game. I don't know the numbers to compare to the rest of the MAC, or prior years. Second, consider that recently a lot of teams in the MAC have gone to 2-3 zone against us. That slows down your points per possession (and game) pretty quick, no matter how good your offensive unit may be.
Last Edited: 2/10/2012 3:21:05 PM by OU_Country