Oldham is improving but Filzen has not been as good during MAC play.
The fact the continue to win while getting virtually nothing from Filzen is significant.
They are beasically run by McCrea and Watt and if you control them, they're nothing.
I like that you state this as thought this is easy.
I'm just gonna say, the numbers are in Ohio's favor and the eye test goes in Ohio's favor.
Which numbers?
The only thing that goes UB's way is in game statistics, but even that can be factored out when you consider that Ohio plays some of the best defense in the MAC.
This makes absolutely no sense. Are there out-of-game statistics? UB's stats don't matter because Ohio plays better defense? Does the fact Buffalo rebounds
much better than Ohio not mean anything?
U just can't throw out a head to head matchup when doing PR like this, especially when it was a mostly one-sided game.
I never threw it out.
Dude, I'm not even going to argue this anymore. I can tell you that it is amazing that they are winning with the way Filzen is prodcing. But you know what, he hasn't been showing up so what makes you think he'll turn it around. Secondly, you want to know what numbers in OU's favor? How about W/L totals, rpi, good wins, defense points allowed per game, overall points differential (crazy to include ooc), steals. You're looking at mainly offensive number in which UB is better at. And I know I didn't word my third point well but I meant, OU's defense neutralizes whatever good UB offense can do. As we saw when UB took on OU, there much heralded offense did nothing against our defense (I don't care about opponents O. Our D can shut down the majority of teams). And of course its not easy to shut down McCrea and Watt, but if you watched the amount of UB basketball that I did, you would know that it is possible and that McCrea is vastly overrated. McCrea is very good but doesn't dominate much. I would even go as far to say that Watt is better. The fact is, if either of them have an off night, they are toast. I know you said that's hard to stop but it happens a lot when they play good teams. I've seen them too many times play very poorly against average to decent talent (aka Princeton, St. Bonaventure). And my last point was that you didn't put enough emphasis on their head to head matchup.
And last i'll say is this, I know mid-major polls and things like this get criticized, but there is multiple reasons why we are 16th and they aren't even ranked (9 total votes). Its not hard to see why. They may end up better than us but right now they aren't. And please stop with the H/A, conference strength of schedule stuff. You play the game on the schedule and you WIN or LOSE. Simple as that. We are 7-2, they are 7-2. OUr rpi 80 (19-4). UB rpi 88 (14-6).
The only way I can see you putting UB ahead of OU is if you actually think UB is a better team than OU. Which I would be fine if you said that and would stop arguing with you. The problem is you're trying to justify it with other reasoning which doesn't favor UB.
And I'm sorry if this comes across as rude or has bad grammar. I just typed this up fast because I had to respond. Believe me, I'm still a UB die-hard (i was pissed when UB lost to OU in 2004), and I think you're wrong.
Also, one last point, if you do think UB is truly the better team, throw out the rosters and show me how UB is better because I'm just not buying it.
Last Edited: 2/7/2012 11:52:45 PM by Mike Bundt WHIZ