Do people honestly think the venue is the problem, or do they just want the tournament in a more convenient location for themselves? Double or triple the attendance in Bucknut land? That's got to be a joke. Cleveland is basically an hour from two of the best programs in the MAC. Eliminating a bunch of Kent and Akron fans isn't a really good recipe for success. Any problems with attendance have a lot more to do with the teams playing and their respective fan bases than the location of the tournament. You really think the drive from DeKalb, Mount Pleasant, or Kalamazoo would be more appealing if it was in Columbus? Those teams were awful, and if you're honest with yourself, you know you wouldn't drive up from Athens to watch a sub-500 Bobcat team whether it was in Columbus or not. No matter where it is, weekday nights and short notice will always conspire to put a crimp on attendance. Cleveland has been a good host and it's far more neutral and central for the league. I wish attendance was better, but we're talking about league where the #1 and #2 attendance programs averaged around 6,000 and 4,000, and every other team was well below that. Changing where we're playing won't change the persistent apathy of the average MAC fan, nor will it change the poor perception of the league from the casual hoops fan.
Short answer - All I really care about is OHIO (OU, Ohio U, whatever). OHIO 1st - PERIOD. These days w/what's going on w/the apathy in the MAC, OHIO 1st, MAC 2nd...........(and I Really hate to come to this conclusion).
If the rest of the MAC thinks they can bring their "game" attendance wise to further the interests of the conference - well then friggin' do it all year long. If not - then........Let's Play FOR OHIO! MAC, or No MAC. (Times - They Are A Changin")
Last Edited: 3/10/2012 12:46:39 AM by RSBobcat