menu
Logo
Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Official NCAA Tournament 3rd Round Thread: South Florida
Page: 1 of 2
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,948
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 1:40 AM
Use this thread to talk about anything game-related.

Date: March 18th, 2012 at 7:10 PM 

Opponent: South Florida   (22-13, 12-6 Big East)

Site: Bridgestone Arena in Nashville, TN

TV: TBS

Radio:  Ohio Radio

Webcast: March Madness On Demand

USF's media guideroster and statistics
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 2:09 AM
O-H-I-O
TheGreatLarryMoe
General User
TGLM
Member Since: 2/27/2005
Location: Malta, OH
Post Count: 68
person
mail
TheGreatLarryMoe
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 2:24 AM
I'm liking this matchup. USF isn't a high scoring team. Their lead scorer averages 9.6 points per game. With OUr size advantage and shooting capabilities, I see DJ and the gang picking their defense apart. They didn't look impressive at all in the first half  vs Temple, but they did shoot 65% in the second half. So that is something to be aware of. I don't think shooting nights like that are common, but we know what they are capable of. I see a similar game as the Michigan game, but I wouldn't be surprised to see the Bobcats run away with it.

Also worth noting: All of the announcers and analysts referred to us as Ohio tonight. I did not hear Ohio U once. 

Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 9:26 AM
It's weird to say that a 12 seed is a worse match-up than a four seed, but Ohio will be challenged by USF's size -- especially when it comes to rebounding. On the flip side, if Ohio can get those turnovers and get out and run, there's a potential to pull away from them.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 9:39 AM
TheGreatLarryMoe wrote:expand_more
With OUr size advantage and shooting capabilities, I see DJ and the gang picking their defense apart.


Ummmm, what size advantage?
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 9:51 AM
I think South Florida is a tougher draw for Ohio than Michigan was.  Hopefully Coach Groce and his staff watched USF's game with Temple as I can't imagine we have a lot of tape on USF.  USF looked just as athletic as Ohio is and I'm not sure we'll be able to "out-quick" them.  Keep in mind too that USF is coached by Stan Heath, who took Kent State to the Elite 8 in 2002 (ableit with Gary Waters' recruits), so this is definitely not a team that Ohio should be overlooking, and I'm sure they're not.

As always,  GO CATS!!!!
Last Edited: 3/17/2012 10:13:16 AM by Mark Lembright '85
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 10:29 AM
We are a 4 point dog
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,948
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 10:37 AM
Mark Lembright '85 wrote:expand_more
I think South Florida is a tougher draw for Ohio than Michigan was.  Hopefully Coach Groce and his staff watched USF's game with Temple as I can't imagine we have a lot of tape on USF.  USF looked just as athletic as Ohio is and I'm not sure we'll be able to "out-quick" them.  Keep in mind too that USF is coached by Stan Heath, who took Kent State to the Elite 8 in 2002 (ableit with Gary Waters' recruits), so this is definitely not a team that Ohio should be overlooking, and I'm sure they're not.

As always,  GO CATS!!!!


The Ohio coaches stayed to watch USF/Temple.
CeramicBobcat
General User
Member Since: 12/23/2005
Location: Brookpark, OH
Post Count: 32
mail
CeramicBobcat
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 11:15 AM
USF has a size advantage and will be a challenge on the glass at both ends. Our speed, transition, and ball control will be our advantage. Hopefully, we will push the game more up-tempo and make their big guys run. Make fatigue an issue. It does appear they are well balanced (no clear go-to scoring leader) and have depth in their line-up and will sub out. Their perimeter defense appears comparable to ours at least on a stat sheet, 29% opp 3pt fg %. Anyone can be streaky, good or bad come tourney time. I would rather prepare that they will be hot and then have us have to execute our game plan. This will be a close one I believe. Whichever team stays true to their plan and forces the other out of theirs will come out the victors.


***What do you mean "it doesn't burn?" Everything burns. Just ask the Sun.***
71 BOBCAT
General User
71B
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 1,954
person
mail
71 BOBCAT
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 11:20 AM
I must admit that I was looking forward to playing TU.
We beat them in football and would have the chance to beat them in basketball.
I actually thought that TU would be the easier game for us despite their #5 seeding.
I am currently more concerned about this game.
I am thinking that USF did have to "play in" to this tournament. That says something.
I do like how our guys are thinking about this tournament. Their mind set is great.



GO BOBCATS
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 11:37 AM
After the Georgetown win, I got the feeling Ohio was gassed. Scoring 97 took everything they had in the tank. 

I don't get that feeling about this year. There was little straining to get that win on Friday night. Ohio simply played a solid basketball game. Cooper is stronger. Johnson and Hall are the type of energy guys that I don't know if Ohio had in 2010. 
Good cat Good cat
General User
GCGC
Member Since: 12/24/2004
Post Count: 131
person
mail
Good cat Good cat
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 11:57 AM
You could tell that we were gassed with about 4 min or so left against Michigan. With that said, I like that USF had to play in that extra play-in game.....we need to run whenever possible - we got zero transition points against Michigan....USF was ice cold shooting in the first half, but seemed patient against Temple's match-up zone. USF will be more athletic than Michgian was, but not quite at the swarming level of when we played Tennessee in the tournament 2 years ago. USF a strong defensive team.....just need to play smart and at least break even on the boards...
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 1:10 PM
Good cat Good cat wrote:expand_more
You could tell that we were gassed with about 4 min or so left against Michigan. With that said, I like that USF had to play in that extra play-in game.....we need to run whenever possible - we got zero transition points against Michigan....USF was ice cold shooting in the first half, but seemed patient against Temple's match-up zone. USF will be more athletic than Michgian was, but not quite at the swarming level of when we played Tennessee in the tournament 2 years ago. USF a strong defensive team.....just need to play smart and at least break even on the boards...


Ohio didn't give up a point in the last 4:15. Gassed teams don't defend that well.
Donuts
General User
D
Member Since: 9/22/2010
Post Count: 734
person
mail
Donuts
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 2:56 PM
USF scares me because I see them capable of making a First Four to Final Four run like VCU last year.

They are hungry too, because they are trying to change the basketball culture there.

I agree with the thought of USF being tougher than Michigan. I think we are tougher than Temple too. To be completely honest, the two best teams out of the four are playing Sunday. I don't care what the seeds say.
DayvidGallagher
General User
Member Since: 7/29/2010
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 206
mail
DayvidGallagher
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 3:52 PM
I was a little disappointed to see we are 2.5 pt underdogs tomorrow.  Can anyone tell me the last time a MAC team was favored in the tournament?
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 3:58 PM
DayvidGallagher wrote:expand_more
I was a little disappointed to see we are 2.5 pt underdogs tomorrow.  Can anyone tell me the last time a MAC team was favored in the tournament?


I might be wrong but I think Central was a slight favorite against Creighton in 2003.
Panda
General User
P
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Post Count: 280
person
mail
Panda
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 4:17 PM
For those that care the coaches have all of the necessary USF videos, as there is a bank that they can draw from for each game.  They may only want the 5/6 games  that would be close to our style of play.

 I don't think that we were gassed as was previously expressed,  We played great defense and UM could not make shots because they lost their legs. 
Turney13
General User
T13
Member Since: 7/28/2010
Post Count: 364
person
mail
Turney13
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 8:57 PM
Brian Smith wrote:expand_more
After the Georgetown win, I got the feeling Ohio was gassed. Scoring 97 took everything they had in the tank. 

I don't get that feeling about this year. There was little straining to get that win on Friday night. Ohio simply played a solid basketball game. Cooper is stronger. Johnson and Hall are the type of energy guys that I don't know if Ohio had in 2010. 


I dont think it was as much the 97 we dropped that night as it was the week before

Sun, Mar 7 18-14 (7-9)
Thu, Mar 11 19-14 (7-9)
Fri, Mar 12 20-14 (7-9)
Sat, Mar 13 21-14 (7-9)
MEN'S BASKETBALL CHAMPIONSHIP - MIDWEST REGION - 1st ROUND AT PROVIDENCE RI
Thu, Mar 18 22-14 (7-9)
MEN'S BASKETBALL CHAMPIONSHIP - MIDWEST REGION - 2nd ROUND AT PROVIDENCE RI
Sat, Mar 20 22-15 (7-9)
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 3/17/2012 9:05 PM
That's a great point, Turney.

The NCAA tournament looms so large that it's easy to forget that just seven days before it was the MAC tournament.

And it's another reason I love the bye system the MAC has implemented. The likely champion isn't run down heading into the tourney.
oubobcatjohn
General User
O
Member Since: 1/1/2005
Post Count: 838
person
mail
oubobcatjohn
mail
Posted: 3/18/2012 12:10 AM

South Florida was like 10-6 in Big East play and that conference record is impressive.  They play great defense and like Ohio have earned their way with tough defense with timely offense.  Two junkyard dogs going after the last bone. This one will be physical. This is the game we may need the bench to contribute more because of fouls. Who wins the battle on the boards and lose balls wins this game. South Florida and Ohio are two teams that got here with defense and tough play.   

OUBob
General User
OUB
Member Since: 9/9/2010
Location: Powell, OH
Post Count: 278
person
mail
OUBob
mail
Posted: 3/18/2012 9:36 AM
Jon Smith didn't see many minutes at Michigan right? He should be rested. I assume he will see many more minutes just to clean boards and get fouled.

Were gonna be disruptive of their offense and will have to earn every point.
ts1227
General User
T1227
Member Since: 2/28/2006
Location: Tallmadge, OH
Post Count: 880
person
mail
ts1227
mail
Posted: 3/18/2012 12:36 PM
DayvidGallagher wrote:expand_more
I was a little disappointed to see we are 2.5 pt underdogs tomorrow.  Can anyone tell me the last time a MAC team was favored in the tournament?


It opened at USF -4, so it's come down.  Most places have it at USF -2 now.
Last Edited: 3/18/2012 12:37:15 PM by ts1227
First Street Forever
General User
Member Since: 12/19/2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Count: 247
mail
First Street Forever
mail
Posted: 3/18/2012 1:47 PM
I don't like the fact that USF is a directional. Directionals have been muddying up Ohio's path to glory for way too long. Whether it's sucking the life out of the MAC, providing unnecessary agita about rumors of their ilk "augmenting" the MAC  or hurting us when least expected, directionals have proven to be a terrible scourge.

I knew that we would beat Michigan. At best I have very, very guarded optimism that we could win - only because of the compassal nature of our opponent.


Last Edited: 3/18/2012 1:47:38 PM by First Street Forever
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 3/18/2012 3:44 PM
First Street Forever wrote:expand_more
I don't like the fact that USF is a directional. Directionals have been muddying up Ohio's path to glory for way too long. Whether it's sucking the life out of the MAC, providing unnecessary agita about rumors of their ilk "augmenting" the MAC  or hurting us when least expected, directionals have proven to be a terrible scourge.

I knew that we would beat Michigan. At best I have very, very guarded optimism that we could win - only because of the compassal nature of our opponent.




I would just like to express my love for the turn of phrase "compassal nature" in that post. I feel like a British person would pronounce that in an awesome way I cannot fathom.
Steve
General User
S
Member Since: 12/1/2005
Post Count: 713
person
mail
Steve
mail
Posted: 3/18/2012 4:21 PM

We got a nice shout-out on the scoreboard at halftime of the Cavaliers game at the Q. Congratulated us on our win over Michigan and wished us luck tonight. 
 

Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 34
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)