menu
Logo
Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Stevens turns down Illinois
Page: 2 of 2
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
mail
OU_Country
mail
Posted: 3/26/2012 3:28 PM
CATman wrote:expand_more
If he stays and finishes out what he has started he will be inthe same boat Shaka is.....even if this team underperforms the lustre will not come off as I am sure his feiry ways will not change much.... he is gonna keep his system in place and his players.....and now his reptuation. He needs to ride it out and get the pay day and the dream job....in a place like OHIO  that he can sell recruits and their families..and enjoy raising his own family.


The biggest difference between Groce and guys like Stevens / Smart is that they reside at schools who seem to have much larger basketball budgets. Not only much larger budgets but a much higher level of overall athletics support from the university as a whole. 

Money could probably keep Groce here but Ohio lacks the funds (today) and the overall support to generate them (tomorrow). At least in the capacity that's needed. That just seems to be the unfortunate reality.

You can argue that this sweet 16 run should help but we're not talking about $5,000-$10,000 here. To retain a coach that is as hot as Groce, if Illinois wants him, it would take doubling his salary to even enter the discussion (and in the end, that might not even be enough).

It's not just the additional 300K this year to get him to come back, it's 300-400K a year for 4-5 years as well.  The AD is looking at 2 million plus incentives, over the course of 4-5 years, just to keep him around. Not sure how it is economically feasible without a private party providing a rather large sum of money via a donation.  

I know Ohio stands to receive a nice financial return from NCAA win shares but I don't know how realistic it is to expect the school to funnel ALL of that money in to only the Men's Basketball program. I personally would be all for it but the athletic department has other bills to pay. They may not be able to justify spending all the NCAA win shares on a single athletic team. The BBall team certainly earned it but at a smaller school, the overall economics play a much larger role in allocating money. 

With all that said, hopefully someone on the board can win Mega Millions tonight. That would solve the problem. 


I look at this statement, and I honestly think there's really no reason that ALL of that increased NCAA TV Money shouldn't go to the basketball program.  This Sweet 16 run does more for the University that football has in essentially it's entire existence.  Same for all other sports.  Why shouldn't that money be allocated to the program that earned it?

I've said it one hundred times, I'll say it again:  The best chance for the MAC to gain national recognition for all of it's member institutions remains with basketball.  The bigger these power conferences get in football, the more difficult it becomes to get a slice of that pie.  More people see wins in the NCAA Tournament than will ever see a win in a non-BCS bowl game.  Plus, football is far more expensive for the university to fund.  The added budget from this success should go towards the basketball budget primarily.

Showing Messages: 26 - 26 of 26
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)