Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: What do we need to do to lock up an NIT at large bid?
Page: 1 of 1
Bball Jones
General User
BJ
Member Since: 10/23/2010
Post Count: 128
person
mail
Bball Jones
mail
Posted: 1/29/2013 1:25 PM
I'm a worst case scenario kind of guy, so I'm just wondering, if we don't win the MAC tourney or the regular season championship, what do we have to do to get at least an at large NIT bid. I think our recent NCCA success, current record and the fact we are no less than the #2 team in the league helps. Do we have to avoid losses against everybody but Akron and get to the championship game.  What final record do we need to make the cut?  Just curious what the experts think?
Buster
General User
Member Since: 12/21/2007
Post Count: 405
mail
Buster
mail
Posted: 1/29/2013 1:40 PM
MAC Championship or bust.
bobcat695
General User
B695
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Parkersburg, WV
Post Count: 1,345
person
mail
bobcat695
mail
Posted: 1/29/2013 1:58 PM
Aren't all NIT bids at-large bids? 
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,948
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 1/29/2013 2:11 PM
bobcat695 wrote:expand_more
Aren't all NIT bids at-large bids? 


No. If you're the regular season conference champs but don't win your conference tourney, you get an automatic bid. Akron was assured of an NIT bid regardless of what happened in the MAC Tourney.


Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,948
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 1/29/2013 3:08 PM
Bball Jones wrote:expand_more
I'm a worst case scenario kind of guy, so I'm just wondering, if we don't win the MAC tourney or the regular season championship, what do we have to do to get at least an at large NIT bid. I think our recent NCCA success, current record and the fact we are no less than the #2 team in the league helps. Do we have to avoid losses against everybody but Akron and get to the championship game.  What final record do we need to make the cut?  Just curious what the experts think?


Now that the NCAA owns the NIT the bids are a lot more merit-based then prior. But that doesn't mean it's fair. Here were the RPIs for the at-large teams last year:

Marshall - 44
UCF - 54
Miami (FL) - 60
Ole Miss - 61
Oregon - 63
Northwestern - 65
Seton Hall - 68
St. Joe's - 69
N Iowa - 72
Miss. St. - 75
Arizona - 76
UMass - 77
Dayton - 81
LSU - 84
Cleveland St. 85
Tennessee - 86
LaSalle - 87
Minnesota - 90
Stanford - 98
Illinois St. - 99
Iowa - 131

Biggest snub: Weber St. at 71
Jim Bob
General User
JB
Member Since: 2/2/2006
Post Count: 53
person
mail
Jim Bob
mail
Posted: 1/29/2013 6:08 PM
i hate when we start talking NIT bids.  Kind of embarassing and rarely is based on merit.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 1/29/2013 6:58 PM
Jim Bob wrote:expand_more
i hate when we start talking NIT bids.  Kind of embarassing and rarely is based on merit.


Why is talking about the NIT embarrassing?  It's not like we are in one of the money conferences. If we don't win the MAC tournament I hope we get an NIT bid and I sure as hell won't be embarrassed by it.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 1/29/2013 7:50 PM
There really isn't any way for a team (MAC or otherwise) to lock up an at-large NIT bid.  Beyond the auto bids Ted mentioned, the selection committee goes by a set of "principles" for naming and seeding the field.  I think there are three that are probably overarching:

"The committee shall select the best available teams to fill the NIT field."

"There is no limit on the number of teams the committee may select from one conference."

"On the ballot, each committee member shall identify not more than 32 teams that should be invited to the tournament based upon their successful play to date."

In other words, the committee members select the teams that they think should be in the tournament, no matter what their record, no matter what their RPI, no matter their strength of schedule.  It's the "best" teams available, however they define "best."  They can rely on whatever biases they may have and may be influenced by whatever factors (including TV ratings and potential attendance) they choose.  So, the best thing is to forget about the NIT and concentrate on winning the MAC Championship.
Last Edited: 1/29/2013 7:51:59 PM by Pataskala
Showing Messages: 1 - 8 of 8
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)