Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Off Topic: terrible bb
Page: 1 of 1
bobcat2nc
General User
B2
Member Since: 12/28/2004
Post Count: 584
person
mail
bobcat2nc
mail
Posted: 2/7/2013 9:41 PM
Watching UCLA v Washington. Some of us think the MAC is down...this is terrible basketball.
LuckySparrow
General User
Member Since: 10/16/2012
Location: IL
Post Count: 1,814
mail
LuckySparrow
mail
Posted: 2/7/2013 9:54 PM
PAC 10 is a really disappointing conference. 
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
mail
OU_Country
mail
Posted: 2/7/2013 10:15 PM
You might think they're terrible, but the PAC will probably get four teams in come March, if not five.
Jughead
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Location: Chillicothe, OH
Post Count: 478
mail
Jughead
mail
Posted: 2/7/2013 11:01 PM
And we all know that it will be a sham.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,823
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 2/7/2013 11:10 PM
You think this year is bad? Last year was something to forget about. What did they get? One or two teams in?

This year they are a little bit better, but hopefully the conference tournament knocks a couple of them out and opens up some more space for mid-majors.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 2/8/2013 11:46 AM
I think they'll only get two, maybe three in.  Az, Colo & UCLA are top 40 RPIs and that's usually the dropping point.  Oregon probably has to be the conference champ to get in. 

The MWC has supplanted the Pac-12 as the major conference west of the Great Plains.  They had three top 25 teams at one point, and a fourth -- unbeaten (at the time) Wyoming -- hovering just outside.  They have four teams with top 25 RPIs -- NM (3), Colo St. (14). UNLV (23) & SDSU (24). 
Columbus_Bobcat
General User
CB
Member Since: 11/23/2012
Post Count: 413
person
mail
Columbus_Bobcat
mail
Posted: 2/8/2013 12:06 PM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
I think they'll only get two, maybe three in.  Az, Colo & UCLA are top 40 RPIs and that's usually the dropping point.  Oregon probably has to be the conference champ to get in. 

The MWC has supplanted the Pac-12 as the major conference west of the Great Plains.  They had three top 25 teams at one point, and a fourth -- unbeaten (at the time) Wyoming -- hovering just outside.  They have four teams with top 25 RPIs -- NM (3), Colo St. (14). UNLV (23) & SDSU (24). 


Oregon will get in. Having beaten Zona, and being ranked at one point in the top 10. If anything, i'm disappointed in what are normal powerhouses: Kentucky, Vanderbilt, UNC, Texas, and West Virginia. Also, there has been a bunch of low basketball games recently where the scores are like 25-23 going into halftime. Poor shooting, not good defense. 

Right now, Final Four: Michigan, Duke, Indiana, and Miami. Yes, Miami. 
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
mail
OU_Country
mail
Posted: 2/8/2013 3:36 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
You think this year is bad? Last year was something to forget about. What did they get? One or two teams in?

This year they are a little bit better, but hopefully the conference tournament knocks a couple of them out and opens up some more space for mid-majors.



I hope this about most "major" conference tournaments.  I truly wish they'd make a rule in the selection process for at-large that won't allow anyone in with a sub .500 conference record.  After last night there were plenty of comments about the Illini being "in", which I think would be a disgrace, no matter how much I'm rooting for Groce to succeed.
Showing Messages: 1 - 8 of 8
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)