Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: NiT automatic. bids
Page: 1 of 2
Victory
General User
V
Member Since: 3/11/2012
Post Count: 2,519
person
mail
Victory
mail
Posted: 10/27/2023 6:33 PM
NIT has stopped guaranteeing spots for regular season conference champions.
GraffZ06
General User
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Dayton, OH
Post Count: 2,436
mail
GraffZ06
mail
Posted: 10/27/2023 8:10 PM
I have no problem with removing the regular season auto bid. It's reason #974 that the regular season only matters to the P6 (mostly) for at-large considerations.

What really stinks is the new auto bids to the top two NET teams from only the p6 who didn't make the dance.

Good luck mids. Nobody cares about you unless they're picking you as their NCAA Cinderella. Be prepared for half the NIT being 500 or below big boys.

Wonder what this will equate to in lost TV revenue for mids like the MAC who generally get 1 or even 2 teams in the NIT.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,574
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 10/27/2023 11:42 PM
This reads to me like the NIT is financial dire straits and they're trying whatever they can to keep it alive. Color me unsurprised if, in a few years, the final weekend is no longer in MSG as a last hail mary before they finally take it behind the barn.
GraffZ06
General User
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Dayton, OH
Post Count: 2,436
mail
GraffZ06
mail
Posted: 10/28/2023 9:52 AM
I agree JSF.

I honestly don't know. Does the NIT provide per game payouts to the teams or conferences like the NCAA or not?

Maybe you kill two birds with one stone. Expand the NCAA and let the NIT go the way of the DoDo.
M.D.W.S.T
General User
Member Since: 12/24/2021
Post Count: 3,658
mail
M.D.W.S.T
mail
Posted: 10/28/2023 12:56 PM
Victory wrote:expand_more
NIT has stopped guaranteeing spots for regular season conference champions.
It's unfortunate that G5 conference champions may soon not have a home - but it always felt like it was just a matter of time, before the NCAA found a way to really finish off regular season champions meaning absolutely nothing. Because it doesn't. Matters even less in one-bid conferences like the MAC.

Money matters more than anything. I dont feel like the NIT is going anywhere though. Americans LOVE football, but the NIT feels a lot like 6-6 vs 7-5 bowl games. People are gonna watch it, bc they love sports.

16-16 Florida is a bigger draw than Alcorn State every day of the week.

17-15 Michigan is getting more eyes than Morehead State.

17-16 Villanova... more people want to see them over Toledo.
FearLeon
General User
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 5,129
mail
FearLeon
mail
Posted: 10/28/2023 2:39 PM
M.D.W.S.T wrote:expand_more
NIT has stopped guaranteeing spots for regular season conference champions.
It's unfortunate that G5 conference champions may soon not have a home - but it always felt like it was just a matter of time, before the NCAA found a way to really finish off regular season champions meaning absolutely nothing. Because it doesn't. Matters even less in one-bid conferences like the MAC.

Money matters more than anything. I dont feel like the NIT is going anywhere though. Americans LOVE football, but the NIT feels a lot like 6-6 vs 7-5 bowl games. People are gonna watch it, bc they love sports.

16-16 Florida is a bigger draw than Alcorn State every day of the week.

17-15 Michigan is getting more eyes than Morehead State.

17-16 Villanova... more people want to see them over Toledo.
From Mid-Major Madness twitter:

A coach from the MAC says:

“Regular season means nothing now. Your season starts and ends in the conference tourney. For us, whoever gets to Cleveland, you have 3 days to figure it out.“
___________________

We knew it for years, but now even more true with the NIT news. I would put my money on Boals making this comment and he’s 150% correct.
cbarber357
General User
C357
Member Since: 9/10/2012
Location: Pickerington, OH
Post Count: 1,152
person
mail
cbarber357
mail
Posted: 10/28/2023 3:06 PM
Honestly I’d rather watch a tournament of all good mid-major teams than the NIT, not that I could even tell you the last time I watching the NIT.
Pete Chouteau
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: You Can't See Me
Post Count: 1,696
mail
Pete Chouteau
mail
Posted: 10/28/2023 9:44 PM
This stinks to high heaven, but the regular season auto bid was not a longstanding policy and it's not like we can point at Toledo and say how well they represented our conference.

Steinbrecher has released a statement that he will push conference presidents to endorse an expanded NCAA field. It's coming.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,793
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 10/29/2023 9:24 AM
Now is the time we invest to move to the ACC, or SEC. Build a new arena, and football stadium and go get that money!
FJC31
General User
FJC31
Member Since: 3/31/2022
Post Count: 2,275
person
mail
FJC31
mail
Posted: 10/29/2023 10:37 AM
M.D.W.S.T wrote:expand_more
NIT has stopped guaranteeing spots for regular season conference champions.
It's unfortunate that G5 conference champions may soon not have a home - but it always felt like it was just a matter of time, before the NCAA found a way to really finish off regular season champions meaning absolutely nothing. Because it doesn't. Matters even less in one-bid conferences like the MAC.

Money matters more than anything. I dont feel like the NIT is going anywhere though. Americans LOVE football, but the NIT feels a lot like 6-6 vs 7-5 bowl games. People are gonna watch it, bc they love sports.

16-16 Florida is a bigger draw than Alcorn State every day of the week.

17-15 Michigan is getting more eyes than Morehead State.

17-16 Villanova... more people want to see them over Toledo.
Good comparison. I think the bigger brand names draw in casual viewerships. However, what would still be considered a success for us (regular season conf. Champ/NIT), is likely deemed a failure by fans of P6 schools. Would they care as much about an NIT appearance after a barely .500 season?
FearLeon
General User
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 5,129
mail
FearLeon
mail
Posted: 10/29/2023 10:59 AM
Pete Chouteau wrote:expand_more
Steinbrecher has released a statement that he will push conference presidents to endorse an expanded NCAA field. It's coming.
I don't see how NCAA Tournament expansion helps the MAC unless it's guaranteed the regular season champion gets an automatic NCAA Tourney bid and I don't see this happening.
Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,637
mail
Andrew Ruck
mail
Posted: 10/30/2023 8:23 AM
Are we even sure it is smart financially to include crappy P6 teams over solid mid-majors? Taking our state as an example, I am not entirely sure a 10th place in B10 Ohio State gets more ratings and sells more tickets than a regular season champ Ohio team. It just seems like power conference fan bases are disgusted and done with their team if they don't make the big tourney.
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User
BLSS
Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,646
person
mail
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
Posted: 10/30/2023 9:53 AM
Andrew Ruck wrote:expand_more
Are we even sure it is smart financially to include crappy P6 teams over solid mid-majors? Taking our state as an example, I am not entirely sure a 10th place in B10 Ohio State gets more ratings and sells more tickets than a regular season champ Ohio team. It just seems like power conference fan bases are disgusted and done with their team if they don't make the big tourney.
I'd be shocked if this isn't the exact analysis the NIT ran to make this decision.

The only thing that matters is TV ratings, and the NIT wouldn't make this choice if the 10th ACC team didn't draw more eyeballs than Toledo.
shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,310
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 10/30/2023 2:18 PM
The NIT has been even more exclusive from mid-majors than the NCAA Tournament for quite some time.

I don't know what recourse there is. If more people watch the NIT because more teams with bigger fanbases are included, the NCAA will chalk it up to the market deciding.

I'd hate to see the conference tournaments go away, but this decision points the sport in that direction. They're a huge fabric of what makes college basketball so great. Look for conferences to handsomely reward the top 1-2 seeds in their bracket formats soon.
shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,310
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 10/30/2023 2:21 PM
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
Are we even sure it is smart financially to include crappy P6 teams over solid mid-majors? Taking our state as an example, I am not entirely sure a 10th place in B10 Ohio State gets more ratings and sells more tickets than a regular season champ Ohio team. It just seems like power conference fan bases are disgusted and done with their team if they don't make the big tourney.
I'd be shocked if this isn't the exact analysis the NIT ran to make this decision.

The only thing that matters is TV ratings, and the NIT wouldn't make this choice if the 10th ACC team didn't draw more eyeballs than Toledo.
Right. If 10th place Georgia Tech goes to the NIT, they might get 3500 people in the door for a home game, but how many more are watching on TV than if that spot went to Toledo?
FearLeon
General User
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 5,129
mail
FearLeon
mail
Posted: 10/30/2023 2:32 PM
shabamon wrote:expand_more
They're a huge fabric of what makes college basketball so great. Look for conferences to handsomely reward the top 1-2 seeds in their bracket formats soon.
I have no problem rewarding the top 2 finishers in the MAC regular season with byes to the semifinals.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 10/30/2023 4:43 PM
I didn't like it before when the MAC sent the #1 and #2 seeds to the semis. It just didn't seem like a legit tournament. And that's why they quit doing it.

Another option would be: all teams get in the NCAA and the conference tournaments are eliminated.

Honestly, I don't know what the best format is now.
Cellis033
General User
Member Since: 11/11/2021
Location: Powell, OH
Post Count: 1,583
mail
Cellis033
mail
Posted: 10/30/2023 9:37 PM
NIT seems like a tournament that has been reeling for a while and has pretty much been the NCAA's hamster on life support. Smells like a Hail Mary type move to save it but I ultimately think it won't live to the end of the decade, and good riddance. (Being dubbed the Not Important Tournament and Not Invited Tournament doesn't help either)

It's about time we get a reputable mid major tournament at the end of the year, even if we don't make the big dance at least we could have the opportunity to be in a competitive tourney with other mid majors with higher seeded teams getting home court advantage.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,574
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 10/31/2023 3:51 PM
Andrew Ruck wrote:expand_more
Are we even sure it is smart financially to include crappy P6 teams over solid mid-majors? Taking our state as an example, I am not entirely sure a 10th place in B10 Ohio State gets more ratings and sells more tickets than a regular season champ Ohio team. It just seems like power conference fan bases are disgusted and done with their team if they don't make the big tourney.
Early rounds, I doubt many teams are pulling in big crowds. Get to NYC? Yeah, there's gonna be a difference between us and an Ohio State.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,677
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 10/31/2023 7:40 PM
With the current mindset, with apologies to the late Coach Hunter, isn't this one-and-done year a type of indentured servitude? How can it be allowed to stand?
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,793
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 11/1/2023 1:29 PM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
With the current mindset, with apologies to the late Coach Hunter, isn't this one-and-done year a type of indentured servitude? How can it be allowed to stand?
You can't restrict a students ability to leave college. The professional sports can though restrict entry.
Pete Chouteau
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: You Can't See Me
Post Count: 1,696
mail
Pete Chouteau
mail
Posted: 11/1/2023 2:32 PM
JSF wrote:expand_more
Are we even sure it is smart financially to include crappy P6 teams over solid mid-majors? Taking our state as an example, I am not entirely sure a 10th place in B10 Ohio State gets more ratings and sells more tickets than a regular season champ Ohio team. It just seems like power conference fan bases are disgusted and done with their team if they don't make the big tourney.
Early rounds, I doubt many teams are pulling in big crowds. Get to NYC? Yeah, there's gonna be a difference between us and an Ohio State.
It's not even in NYC. It's in Indianapolis now.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,677
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 11/1/2023 2:59 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
With the current mindset, with apologies to the late Coach Hunter, isn't this one-and-done year a type of indentured servitude? How can it be allowed to stand?
You can't restrict a students ability to leave college. The professional sports can though restrict entry.
Isn't that age discriminations on the part of NBA? I suspect a law suit against the NBA on this matter would have a favorable outcome if such a case were to reach SCOTUS.
giacomo
General User
G
Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,760
person
mail
giacomo
mail
Posted: 11/1/2023 9:53 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Now is the time we invest to move to the ACC, or SEC. Build a new arena, and football stadium and go get that money!
Pretty funny! It’s all about the money and nobody likes to watch the mid majors.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,677
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 11/2/2023 11:38 AM
giacomo wrote:expand_more
Now is the time we invest to move to the ACC, or SEC. Build a new arena, and football stadium and go get that money!
Pretty funny! It’s all about the money and nobody likes to watch the mid majors.
This is may not be exactly true. In the NCAA tournament nearly everyone roots for the underdog all time, except the fans of the favorite or those who have big bets on the favorite. Any reason that this would not hold true in the NIT -- G5 vs. P6? You'd think that most casual fans who tuned in would be rooting for the G5 school in such a match up.
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 28
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)